The impact of acute bouts of interval and continuous walking on energy-intake and appetite regulation in subjects with type 2 diabetes.

Ida A Müller, Anne-Sophie Wedell-Neergaard, Thomas P J Solomon, Kristian Karstoft
Author Information
  1. Ida A Müller: The Centre of Inflammation and Metabolism and the Centre for Physical Activity Research, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
  2. Anne-Sophie Wedell-Neergaard: The Centre of Inflammation and Metabolism and the Centre for Physical Activity Research, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
  3. Thomas P J Solomon: School of Sport, Exercise, and Rehabilitation Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom.
  4. Kristian Karstoft: The Centre of Inflammation and Metabolism and the Centre for Physical Activity Research, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark. ORCID

Abstract

In healthy subjects, it has been suggested that exercise may acutely suppress energy-intake and appetite, with peak intensity being an important determinant for this effect. In subjects with type 2 diabetes (T2D), the effect of exercise on appetite-related variables is, however, virtually unknown. We aimed to assess the effects of two exercise interventions, differing with regards to peak intensity, on energy-intake, satiety and appetite-related hormones in subjects with T2D. Thirteen subjects with T2D completed three 60-min interventions with continuous measurement of oxygen consumption in a randomized and counterbalanced order: (1) Control, (2) Continuous walking (CW; intended 73% of VOpeak), (3) Interval-walking (IW; repeated cycles of 3 min slow [54% of VOpeak] and 3 min fast walking [89% of VOpeak]). Forty-five minutes after completion of the intervention, a 3-h liquid mixed meal tolerance test (MMTT, 450 kcal) with regular satiety assessments and blood samples for appetite-related hormones commenced. An ad libitum meal was served after the MMTT, with subsequent calculation of energy-intake. Moreover, free-living diet records were completed for the following ~32 h. Exercise interventions were well-matched for mean oxygen consumption (CW = 77 ± 2% of VOpeak; IW = 76 ± 1% of VOpeak,  > 0.05). No differences in appetite-related hormones or energy-intake were found ( > 0.05 for all comparisons). IW increased fullness compared to Control shortly after the intervention ( < 0.05) and tended to reduce hunger 2 h into the MMTT compared to CW and Control ( < 0.10). In conclusion, a single exercise session does not affect energy-intake during the following ~4-36 h in subjects with T2D. However, satiety may be affected up to ~3 h after the exercise session, dependent on peak intensity.

Keywords

References

  1. Appetite. 2013 Feb;61(1):45-51 [PMID: 23137828]
  2. Nutrients. 2017 Apr 05;9(4): [PMID: 28379172]
  3. Eur J Clin Nutr. 1994 Oct;48(10):715-24 [PMID: 7835326]
  4. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1982;14(5):377-81 [PMID: 7154893]
  5. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 1999 May;13(5):609-20 [PMID: 10233184]
  6. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2011 Apr;33(8):880-94 [PMID: 21342212]
  7. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2009 Nov;94(11):4258-66 [PMID: 19808853]
  8. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2016 Nov;4(11):913-921 [PMID: 27595918]
  9. Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2015 Dec;25 Suppl 3:1-72 [PMID: 26606383]
  10. J Appl Physiol (1985). 2013 Sep 1;115(5):618-25 [PMID: 23788577]
  11. Diabetes Care. 2016 Jan;39 Suppl 1:S13-22 [PMID: 26696675]
  12. Ann Agric Environ Med. 2013;20(4):787-93 [PMID: 24364454]
  13. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2014 Sep;99(9):3334-42 [PMID: 24905068]
  14. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab. 2014 Jan 15;306(2):E225-31 [PMID: 24302008]
  15. Methods Enzymol. 2012;514:113-26 [PMID: 22975050]
  16. Sports Med. 2014 Mar;44(3):387-403 [PMID: 24174308]
  17. Appl Physiol Nutr Metab. 2013 Dec;38(12):1236-44 [PMID: 24195624]
  18. Metabolism. 2016 Sep;65(9):1316-25 [PMID: 27506739]
  19. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord. 1999 Dec;23(12):1282-7 [PMID: 10643685]
  20. Int J Obes (Lond). 2014 Mar;38(3):417-22 [PMID: 23835594]
  21. Sports Med. 2015 May;45(5):659-78 [PMID: 25398225]
  22. J Endocrinol. 2009 Apr;201(1):151-9 [PMID: 19158129]
  23. Physiol Rep. 2017 Dec;5(23): [PMID: 29208688]
  24. Br J Nutr. 2001 Apr;85(4):415-30 [PMID: 11348556]
  25. Appetite. 2016 Mar 1;98:80-8 [PMID: 26721721]
  26. Diabetes Care. 2004 Mar;27(3):663-9 [PMID: 14988282]
  27. Diabetes Care. 2013 Feb;36(2):228-36 [PMID: 23002086]
  28. Int J Obes (Lond). 2014 May;38(5):750 [PMID: 24002323]
  29. Br J Sports Med. 2012 Apr;46(5):315-22 [PMID: 21596715]
  30. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord. 2000 Jan;24(1):38-48 [PMID: 10702749]
  31. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2006 Oct 18;(4):CD003817 [PMID: 17054187]
  32. J Endocrinol. 2009 Dec;203(3):357-64 [PMID: 19737911]
  33. Diabetes. 2005 May;54(5):1371-8 [PMID: 15855322]
  34. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2016 Feb;48(2):182-9 [PMID: 26285022]
  35. Diabetes Care. 2014 Jan;37 Suppl 1:S14-80 [PMID: 24357209]
  36. J Chronic Dis. 1978;31(12):741-55 [PMID: 748370]
  37. Am J Clin Nutr. 2004 Nov;80(5):1230-6 [PMID: 15531670]
  38. Int J Obes (Lond). 2008 Sep;32(9):1337-47 [PMID: 18607378]
  39. Ann Intern Med. 2000 Jul 18;133(2):92-103 [PMID: 10896648]

MeSH Term

Aged
Appetite
Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2
Energy Intake
Exercise Therapy
Female
Gastric Emptying
Gastrointestinal Hormones
Humans
Male
Middle Aged
Oxygen Consumption
Walking

Chemicals

Gastrointestinal Hormones

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0subjectsexerciseenergy-intake2T2Dappetite-relatedhormonespeakintensitytypediabetesinterventionssatietyControlwalkingVOpeakMMTT05mayappetiteeffectcompletedcontinuousoxygenconsumptionCWIW3 minVOpeak]interventionmealfollowing > 0compared< 0sessionhealthysuggestedacutelysuppressimportantdeterminantvariableshowevervirtuallyunknownaimedassesseffectstwodifferingregardsThirteenthree60-minmeasurementrandomizedcounterbalancedorder:1Continuousintended73%3Interval-walkingrepeatedcyclesslow[54%fast[89%Forty-fiveminutescompletion3-hliquidmixedtolerancetest450 kcalregularassessmentsbloodsamplescommencedad libitumservedsubsequentcalculationMoreoverfree-livingdietrecords~32 hExercisewell-matchedmeanCW = 77 ± 2%IW = 76 ± 1%differencesfoundcomparisonsincreasedfullnessshortlytendedreducehunger2 h10conclusionsingleaffect~4-36 hHoweveraffected~3 hdependentimpactacuteboutsintervalregulationAppetitegastricemptyinggut

Similar Articles

Cited By (3)