Cognitive Flexibility Training: A Large-Scale Multimodal Adaptive Active-Control Intervention Study in Healthy Older Adults.

Jessika I V Buitenweg, Renate M van de Ven, Sam Prinssen, Jaap M J Murre, K Richard Ridderinkhof
Author Information
  1. Jessika I V Buitenweg: Department of Psychology, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
  2. Renate M van de Ven: Department of Psychology, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
  3. Sam Prinssen: Department of Psychology, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
  4. Jaap M J Murre: Department of Psychology, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
  5. K Richard Ridderinkhof: Department of Psychology, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands.

Abstract

As aging is associated with cognitive decline, particularly in the executive functions, it is essential to effectively improve cognition in older adults. Online cognitive training is currently a popular, though controversial method. Although some changes seem possible in older adults through training, far transfer, and longitudinal maintenance are rarely seen. Based on previous literature we created a unique, state-of-the-art intervention study by incorporating frequent sessions and flexible, novel, adaptive training tasks, along with an active control group. We created a program called TAPASS (Training Project Amsterdam Seniors and Stroke), a randomized controlled trial. Healthy older adults (60-80 y.o.) were assigned to a frequent- (FS) or infrequent switching (IS) experimental condition or to the active control group and performed 58 half-hour sessions over the course of 12 weeks. Effects on executive functioning, processing- and psychomotor speed, planning, verbal long term memory, verbal fluency, and reasoning were measured on four time points before, during and after the training. Additionally, we examined the explorative question which individual aspects added to training benefit. Besides improvements on the training, we found significant time effects on multiple transfer tasks in all three groups that likely reflected retest effects. No training-specific improvements were detected, and we did not find evidence of additional benefits of individual characteristics. Judging from these results, the therapeutic value of using commercially available training games to train the aging brain is modest, though any apparent effects should be ascribed more to expectancy and motivation than to the elements in our training protocol. Our results emphasize the importance of using parallel tests as outcome measures for transfer and including both active and passive control conditions. Further investigation into different training methods is advised, including stimulating social interaction and the use of more variable, novel, group-based yet individual-adjusted exercises.

Keywords

References

  1. J Exp Psychol. 1958 Apr;55(4):352-8 [PMID: 13539317]
  2. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2016 Jul 5;113(27):7470-4 [PMID: 27325761]
  3. Cogn Psychol. 2000 Aug;41(1):49-100 [PMID: 10945922]
  4. Percept Mot Skills. 1977 Apr;44(2):367-73 [PMID: 866038]
  5. PLoS One. 2012;7(1):e29676 [PMID: 22253758]
  6. Front Aging Neurosci. 2014 Oct 14;6:277 [PMID: 25352805]
  7. J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2009 Jan;64(1):14-23 [PMID: 19196693]
  8. Psychol Aging. 2010 Dec;25(4):753-66 [PMID: 20822257]
  9. Psychol Aging. 2008 Dec;23(4):743-53 [PMID: 19140646]
  10. Trends Cogn Sci. 2012 Dec;16(12):582-3 [PMID: 23089361]
  11. Front Psychol. 2011 Sep 15;2:228 [PMID: 21954388]
  12. Mol Psychiatry. 2014 Feb;19(2):265-71 [PMID: 24166407]
  13. Psychol Aging. 2011 Dec;26(4):813-22 [PMID: 21707176]
  14. Perspect Psychol Sci. 2013 Jul;8(4):445-54 [PMID: 26173122]
  15. Psychiatry Investig. 2013 Dec;10(4):346-51 [PMID: 24474982]
  16. Clin Geriatr Med. 2013 Nov;29(4):737-52 [PMID: 24094294]
  17. Annu Rev Psychol. 2010;61:383-409 [PMID: 19575618]
  18. BMC Neurol. 2015 Aug 20;15:144 [PMID: 26286548]
  19. Neuropsychol Rehabil. 2007 Jan;17(1):1-33 [PMID: 17178603]
  20. Neuropsychol Dev Cogn B Aging Neuropsychol Cogn. 2009;16(1):56-79 [PMID: 18686051]
  21. Int J Aging Hum Dev. 2006;62(2):175-84 [PMID: 16541929]
  22. Psychon Bull Rev. 2015 Apr;22(2):366-77 [PMID: 25102926]
  23. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2006 Aug 15;103(33):12523-8 [PMID: 16888038]
  24. Appl Neuropsychol. 2009;16(1):62-75 [PMID: 19205950]
  25. Ageing Res Rev. 2014 May;15:28-43 [PMID: 24607830]
  26. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 1984 Apr;10(2):276-91 [PMID: 6232345]
  27. Cyberpsychol Behav Soc Netw. 2013 Dec;16(12):892-7 [PMID: 23971430]
  28. Acta Psychiatr Scand. 1983 Jun;67(6):361-70 [PMID: 6880820]
  29. Gerontechnology. 2010 Jan 1;9(1):5-17 [PMID: 22973185]
  30. Psychon Bull Rev. 2016 Feb;23(1):306-16 [PMID: 26082280]
  31. PLoS Med. 2014 Nov 18;11(11):e1001756 [PMID: 25405755]
  32. Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2008 Feb;34(2):248-59 [PMID: 18212333]
  33. Front Hum Neurosci. 2012 Aug 17;6:221 [PMID: 22912609]
  34. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2010 Apr;34(5):660-9 [PMID: 19715723]
  35. Front Hum Neurosci. 2016 Apr 20;10:150 [PMID: 27148007]
  36. Dev Psychol. 2014 Jan;50(1):304-15 [PMID: 23688173]
  37. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 2004 Oct;26(7):874-90 [PMID: 15742539]
  38. J Neural Transm (Vienna). 2014 Sep;121(9):1183-98 [PMID: 24796318]
  39. Dialogues Clin Neurosci. 2013 Mar;15(1):109-19 [PMID: 23576894]
  40. J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2007 Jun;62 Spec No 1:19-31 [PMID: 17565162]
  41. PLoS One. 2017 Mar 3;12 (3):e0172993 [PMID: 28257436]
  42. Mem Cognit. 2008 Jun;36(4):735-48 [PMID: 18604957]
  43. Front Hum Neurosci. 2016 May 06;10:206 [PMID: 27199723]
  44. Br Med Bull. 1971 Sep;27(3):272-7 [PMID: 4937273]
  45. Clin Neuropsychol. 2007 Mar;21(2):274-85 [PMID: 17455018]
  46. Cortex. 2003 Sep-Dec;39(4-5):1063-91 [PMID: 14584567]
  47. Psychol Sci. 2007 Aug;18(8):720-6 [PMID: 17680944]
  48. Psychol Aging. 1992 Jun;7(2):242-51 [PMID: 1535198]
  49. Behav Res Methods. 2005 Aug;37(3):498-505 [PMID: 16405146]
  50. Dev Sci. 2009 Nov;12(6):978-90 [PMID: 19840052]
  51. Acta Psychol (Amst). 2012 Jan;139(1):146-58 [PMID: 22133724]
  52. Neuropsychology. 1997 Jan;11(1):138-46 [PMID: 9055277]
  53. Biol Psychol. 2000 Oct;54(1-3):35-54 [PMID: 11035219]
  54. Front Hum Neurosci. 2012 Jun 21;6:183 [PMID: 22737115]
  55. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2016 Apr;31(4):340-8 [PMID: 26205305]
  56. Psychol Aging. 2008 Dec;23(4):692-701 [PMID: 19140641]
  57. J Psychiatr Res. 1997 Nov-Dec;31(6):661-73 [PMID: 9447571]
  58. Nature. 2013 Sep 5;501(7465):97-101 [PMID: 24005416]
  59. Neurobiol Aging. 2012 Mar;33(3):620.e9-620.e22 [PMID: 21497950]
  60. J Psychosom Res. 2017 Jul;98 :40-46 [PMID: 28554371]
  61. Acta Psychol (Amst). 2013 Jan;142(1):74-86 [PMID: 23246789]
  62. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2010 May;24(4):348-57 [PMID: 19934445]
  63. Front Hum Neurosci. 2015 Oct 28;9:592 [PMID: 26578936]
  64. Psychol Aging. 2008 Dec;23(4):765-77 [PMID: 19140648]
  65. Front Psychol. 2013 Feb 01;4:31 [PMID: 23378841]
  66. Perspect Psychol Sci. 2016 Jul;11(4):512-34 [PMID: 27474138]

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0trainingcognitiveagingexecutiveolderadultstransferactivecontroleffectsfunctionsthoughcreatedsessionsnoveltasksgroupHealthyverbaltimeindividualimprovementsresultsusingincludingassociateddeclineparticularlyessentialeffectivelyimprovecognitionOnlinecurrentlypopularcontroversialmethodAlthoughchangesseempossiblefarlongitudinalmaintenancerarelyseenBasedpreviousliteratureuniquestate-of-the-artinterventionstudyincorporatingfrequentflexibleadaptivealongprogramcalledTAPASSTrainingProjectAmsterdamSeniorsStrokerandomizedcontrolledtrial60-80yoassignedfrequent-FSinfrequentswitchingISexperimentalconditionperformed58half-hourcourse12weeksEffectsfunctioningprocessing-psychomotorspeedplanninglongtermmemoryfluencyreasoningmeasuredfourpointsAdditionallyexaminedexplorativequestionaspectsaddedbenefitBesidesfoundsignificantmultiplethreegroupslikelyreflectedretesttraining-specificdetectedfindevidenceadditionalbenefitscharacteristicsJudgingtherapeuticvaluecommerciallyavailablegamestrainbrainmodestapparentascribedexpectancymotivationelementsprotocolemphasizeimportanceparalleltestsoutcomemeasurespassiveconditionsinvestigationdifferentmethodsadvisedstimulatingsocialinteractionusevariablegroup-basedyetindividual-adjustedexercisesCognitiveFlexibilityTraining:Large-ScaleMultimodalAdaptiveActive-ControlInterventionStudyOlderAdultsflexibilityvideogames

Similar Articles

Cited By