Vocational rehabilitation for enhancing return-to-work in workers with traumatic upper limb injuries.

Wen-Hsuan Hou, Ching-Chi Chi, Heng-Lien Lo, Yun-Yun Chou, Ken N Kuo, Hung-Yi Chuang
Author Information
  1. Wen-Hsuan Hou: School of Gerontology Health Management and Master Program in Long-Term Care, College of Nursing, Taipei Medical University, No. 250 Wuxing Street, Taipei, Taiwan, 11031.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Traumatic upper limb injury is a leading cause of work-related disability. After return-to-work (RTW), many survivors of injuries are able to regain a quality of life (QoL) comparable with the normal population. Since RTW plays an important role in economic productivity and regaining health-related QoL, enhancing RTW in workers with traumatic limb injuries is the primary goal of rehabilitation. Vocational rehabilitation has been commonly employed in the field of occupational safety and health to increase the number of injured people returning to the labour market, prevent illness, increase well-being, and reduce disability.
OBJECTIVES: To assess the effects of vocational rehabilitation programmes for enhancing RTW in workers with traumatic upper limb injuries.
SEARCH METHODS: This is an update of a Cochrane review previously published in 2013. We updated our searches of the following databases: the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL; 2017, Issue 9), MEDLINE (to 30 August 2017), EMBASE (to 3 September 2017), CINAHL (to 6 September 2017), and PsycINFO (to 6 September 2017), and we handsearched the references lists of relevant review articles.
SELECTION CRITERIA: We aimed to include all randomised controlled trials (RCTs) comparing vocational rehabilitation with an alternative (control) intervention such as standard rehabilitation, a limited form of the vocational rehabilitation intervention (such as advice on RTW, referral information, or liaison with employer), or waiting-list controls.
DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two authors independently inspected abstracts, and we obtained full papers when necessary. When the two authors disagreed about the inclusion of a study, we resolved disagreements by discussion. A third author arbitrated when necessary.
MAIN RESULTS: Our updated search identified 466 citations. Based on assessments of their titles and abstracts, we decided to evaluate the full texts of five records; however, none met our inclusion criteria.
AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: There is currently no high-quality evidence to support or refute the efficacy of vocational rehabilitation for enhancing RTW in workers with traumatic upper limb injuries. Since injured people in occupational settings frequently receive vocational rehabilitation with the aim of decreasing work disability, enhancing RTW, increasing productivity, and containing the welfare cost, further high-quality RCTs assessing the efficacy of vocational rehabilitation for workers with traumatic upper limb injury are needed to fill this gap in knowledge.

References

  1. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011 Apr 13;(4):CD008160 [PMID: 21491405]
  2. J Occup Rehabil. 2005 Dec;15(4):525-42 [PMID: 16254753]
  3. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2013 Apr;94(4):703-10 [PMID: 23206657]
  4. J Trauma. 2006 Sep;61(3):688-94 [PMID: 16967009]
  5. Occup Environ Med. 2010 Nov;67(11):730-6 [PMID: 20817941]
  6. J Hand Ther. 2014 Jan-Mar;27(1):55-62; quiz 62 [PMID: 24268193]
  7. Pain. 2002 Jan;95(1-2):49-63 [PMID: 11790467]
  8. Disabil Rehabil. 2006 Mar 15;28(5):289-97 [PMID: 16492623]
  9. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1996 Dec 15;21(24):2918-29 [PMID: 9112717]
  10. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Oct 05;(10):CD006955 [PMID: 26436959]
  11. Stat Med. 2001 Feb 15;20(3):391-9 [PMID: 11180309]
  12. Stat Med. 2000 Nov 30;19(22):3127-31 [PMID: 11113947]
  13. Injury. 2008 Dec;39(12):1444-52 [PMID: 18656872]
  14. J Occup Rehabil. 2006 Dec;16(4):529-41 [PMID: 16933146]
  15. Injury. 1994 Apr;25(3):165-7 [PMID: 8168887]
  16. Clin Rehabil. 2015 Jul;29(7):639-52 [PMID: 25413170]
  17. J Hand Ther. 2004 Apr-Jun;17(2):300-8 [PMID: 15162112]
  18. Clin J Pain. 2003 Mar-Apr;19(2):105-13 [PMID: 12616180]
  19. Disabil Rehabil. 2006 Nov 30;28(22):1399-404 [PMID: 17071571]
  20. J Trauma. 2011 Aug;71(2):425-34 [PMID: 21045746]
  21. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2009 Jan 21;(1):CD007256 [PMID: 19160331]
  22. Qual Life Res. 2007 Sep;16(7):1167-78 [PMID: 17616838]
  23. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Mar 30;3:CD011618 [PMID: 28358173]
  24. J Rehabil Med. 2008 Nov;40(10):796-804 [PMID: 19242615]
  25. BMJ. 2001 Jul 21;323(7305):121-3 [PMID: 11463664]
  26. Ann Thorac Surg. 2000 Feb;69(2):663 [PMID: 10735731]
  27. Ann Rheum Dis. 2005 May;64(5):760-4 [PMID: 15834056]
  28. Am J Ind Med. 2005 Feb;47(2):104-12 [PMID: 15662646]
  29. J Rehabil Med. 2008 Jun;40(6):440-5 [PMID: 18509558]
  30. Am J Public Health. 1998 Nov;88(11):1630-7 [PMID: 9807528]
  31. Inj Prev. 2004 Oct;10(5):314-9 [PMID: 15470014]
  32. Tech Hand Up Extrem Surg. 2013 Sep;17(3):124-7 [PMID: 23970193]
  33. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Oct 13;(10):CD010002 [PMID: 24122624]
  34. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 Dec 12;12:CD006389 [PMID: 23235630]
  35. J Occup Rehabil. 2007 Sep;17(3):487-503 [PMID: 17520356]
  36. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1994 Sep 1;19(17):1880-5; discussion 1886 [PMID: 7997919]
  37. J Occup Environ Med. 2003 May;45(5):499-506 [PMID: 12762074]
  38. Am J Ind Med. 2006 Mar;49(3):197-203 [PMID: 16421918]
  39. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2003 Jun 15;28(12):1290-9 [PMID: 12811274]
  40. Occup Environ Med. 2004 Apr;61(4):287-8 [PMID: 15031384]
  41. Arthritis Rheum. 2003 Nov;48(11):3212-8 [PMID: 14613285]
  42. J Rehabil Med. 2009 Nov;41(11):856-69 [PMID: 19841836]
  43. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010 Jan 20;(1):CD001822 [PMID: 20091523]
  44. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2006 Jul 19;(3):CD003324 [PMID: 16856004]
  45. Occup Ther Health Care. 2013 Jul;27(3):238-55 [PMID: 23855610]
  46. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011 Feb 16;(2):CD007569 [PMID: 21328297]
  47. BMJ. 2003 Sep 6;327(7414):557-60 [PMID: 12958120]

MeSH Term

Arm Injuries
Humans
Occupational Health
Rehabilitation, Vocational
Return to Work