Cancer Energy Metabolism: Shutting Power off Cancer Factory.

Soo-Youl Kim
Author Information
  1. Soo-Youl Kim: Cancer Microenvironment Branch, Division of Cancer Biology, Research Institute, National Cancer Center, Goyang 10408, Republic of Korea.

Abstract

In 1923, Dr. Warburg had observed that tumors acidified the Ringer solution when 13 mM glucose was added, which was identified as being due to lactate. When glucose is the only source of nutrient, it can serve for both biosynthesis and energy production. However, a series of studies revealed that the cancer cell consumes glucose for biosynthesis through fermentation, not for energy supply, under physiological conditions. Recently, a new observation was made that there is a metabolic symbiosis in which glycolytic and oxidative tumor cells mutually regulate their energy metabolism. Hypoxic cancer cells use glucose for glycolytic metabolism and release lactate which is used by oxygenated cancer cells. This study challenged the Warburg effect, because Warburg claimed that fermentation by irreversible damaging of mitochondria is a fundamental cause of cancer. However, recent studies revealed that mitochondria in cancer cell show active function of oxidative phosphorylation although TCA cycle is stalled. It was also shown that blocking cytosolic NADH production by aldehyde dehydrogenase inhibition, combined with oxidative phosphorylation inhibition, resulted in up to 80% decrease of ATP production, which resulted in a significant regression of tumor growth in the NSCLC model. This suggests a new theory that NADH production in the cytosol plays a key role of ATP production through the mitochondrial electron transport chain in cancer cells, while NADH production is mostly occupied inside mitochondria in normal cells.

Keywords

References

  1. Science. 1956 Feb 24;123(3191):309-14 [PMID: 13298683]
  2. Science. 1956 Aug 10;124(3215):269-70 [PMID: 13351639]
  3. Mol Cancer Ther. 2011 Dec;10(12):2350-62 [PMID: 21992792]
  4. J Biol Chem. 1979 Apr 25;254(8):2669-76 [PMID: 429309]
  5. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2016 Aug 26;477(3):374-82 [PMID: 27338638]
  6. Exp Mol Med. 2016 Nov 25;48(11):e272 [PMID: 27885254]
  7. Nat Rev Cancer. 2016 Oct;16(10 ):650-62 [PMID: 27634448]
  8. Cell Metab. 2008 Jan;7(1):11-20 [PMID: 18177721]
  9. Cell Metab. 2006 Mar;3(3):177-85 [PMID: 16517405]
  10. Cell. 2017 Oct 5;171(2):358-371.e9 [PMID: 28985563]
  11. Cell Death Dis. 2016 Dec 8;7(12 ):e2511 [PMID: 27929535]
  12. Nat Rev Cancer. 2013 Apr;13(4):227-32 [PMID: 23446547]
  13. Trends Biochem Sci. 2014 Aug;39(8):347-54 [PMID: 25037503]
  14. Cell Biol Int Rep. 1982 Jul;6(7):635-50 [PMID: 6751566]
  15. PLoS One. 2013 May 08;8(5):e63799 [PMID: 23667674]
  16. Oncotarget. 2016 Aug 2;7(31):49397-49410 [PMID: 27384481]
  17. J Biol Chem. 1997 Jul 25;272(30):18808-16 [PMID: 9228055]
  18. Nature. 2017 Jan 5;541(7635):41-45 [PMID: 27974793]
  19. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007 Dec 4;104(49):19345-50 [PMID: 18032601]
  20. J Clin Invest. 2008 Dec;118(12):3930-42 [PMID: 19033663]
  21. Cancer Res. 1977 Nov;37(11):4173-81 [PMID: 198130]
  22. Cancer Res. 2012 Aug 1;72(15):3709-14 [PMID: 22787121]

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0productioncancercellsWarburgglucoseenergyoxidativemetabolismmitochondriaphosphorylationNADHCancerlactatebiosynthesisHoweverstudiesrevealedcellfermentationnewglycolytictumoreffectTCAcycleinhibitionresultedATPtransportchain1923DrobservedtumorsacidifiedRingersolution13mMaddedidentifiedduesourcenutrientcanserveseriesconsumessupplyphysiologicalconditionsRecentlyobservationmademetabolicsymbiosismutuallyregulateHypoxicusereleaseusedoxygenatedstudychallengedclaimedirreversibledamagingfundamentalcauserecentshowactivefunctionalthoughstalledalsoshownblockingcytosolicaldehydedehydrogenasecombined80%decreasesignificantregressiongrowthNSCLCmodelsuggeststheorycytosolplayskeyrolemitochondrialelectronmostlyoccupiedinsidenormalEnergyMetabolism:ShuttingPowerFactoryElectronMalate-aspartateshuttleOxidative

Similar Articles

Cited By (70)