The interpretation of proverbs by elderly with high, medium and low educational level: Abstract reasoning as an aspect of executive functions.

Thalita Bianchi de Oliveira Wachholz, Mônica Sanches Yassuda
Author Information
  1. Thalita Bianchi de Oliveira Wachholz: Graduate in Gerontology from the Escola de Artes, Ciências e Humanidades da Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo SP, Brazil.
  2. Mônica Sanches Yassuda: Associate Professor, PhD, of the Gerontology Course of the Escola de Artes, Ciências e Humanidades da Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo SP, Brazil.

Abstract

It is now known that cognitive functions tend to decline with age. Executive functions (EF) are among the first abilities to decline with aging. A subcomponent of the EF is abstract reasoning. The Test of Proverbs is an instrument that can be used to evaluate the capacity of abstract reasoning.
OBJECTIVE: To examine the association of performance in interpretation of proverbs, with education and with episodic memory and EF tasks.
METHODS: A total of 67 individuals aged between 60 and 75 years were evaluated, and divided into three categories of education: 1-4 years, 5-8 years, and 9 or more years of schooling. The instruments used were a sociodemographic questionnaire (gender, age, marital status, education, income, previous occupation, current occupation and health perception), the Mini Mental State Examination, Brief Cognitive Screening Battery; Geriatric Depression Scale; Forward and Backward Digit Span (WAIS-III), and the Test of Proverbs.
RESULTS: A high impact of education was seen on the interpretation of proverbs, with lower performance among the elderly with less education. A significant association between performance on the Test of Proverbs and scores on the MMSE, GDS, and verbal fluency tests was found. There was a modest association with incidental memory.
CONCLUSIONS: The capacity to interpret proverbs is strongly associated with education and with performance on other EF tasks.

Keywords

References

  1. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 1997 Apr;40(2):245-53 [PMID: 9130197]
  2. Brain Cogn. 2002 Aug;49(3):259-67 [PMID: 12139953]
  3. Psychol Bull. 1996 Sep;120(2):272-92 [PMID: 8831298]
  4. Arq Neuropsiquiatr. 2003 Sep;61(3B):777-81 [PMID: 14595482]
  5. Brain Cogn. 2009 Dec;71(3):240-5 [PMID: 19796862]
  6. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2009 May;24(5):459-68 [PMID: 18819162]
  7. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2006;30(8):1182-205 [PMID: 17079014]
  8. Arq Neuropsiquiatr. 1997 Mar;55(1):56-61 [PMID: 9332561]
  9. Cad Saude Publica. 2005 Jan-Feb;21(1):64-72 [PMID: 15692639]
  10. Arq Neuropsiquiatr. 1999 Jun;57(2B):421-6 [PMID: 10450349]
  11. Arq Neuropsiquiatr. 2007 Jun;65(2A):299-303 [PMID: 17607432]
  12. Arch Clin Neuropsychol. 2009 Feb;24(1):71-9 [PMID: 19041220]
  13. Brain Cogn. 2008 Jun;67(1):51-7 [PMID: 18164527]

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0proverbseducationfunctionsEFreasoningperformanceyearsabstractTestProverbsassociationinterpretationdeclineageamongagingusedcapacitymemorytasksoccupationhighelderlyexecutivenowknowncognitivetendExecutivefirstabilitiessubcomponentinstrumentcanevaluateOBJECTIVE:examineepisodicMETHODS:total67individualsaged6075evaluateddividedthreecategorieseducation:1-45-89schoolinginstrumentssociodemographicquestionnairegendermaritalstatusincomepreviouscurrenthealthperceptionMiniMentalStateExaminationBriefCognitiveScreeningBatteryGeriatricDepressionScaleForwardBackwardDigitSpanWAIS-IIIRESULTS:impactseenlowerlesssignificantscoresMMSEGDSverbalfluencytestsfoundmodestincidentalCONCLUSIONS:interpretstronglyassociatedmediumloweducationallevel:Abstractaspecttest

Similar Articles

Cited By