Measurements of Radiofrequency Radiation with a Body-Borne Exposimeter in Swedish Schools with Wi-Fi.

Lena K Hedendahl, Michael Carlberg, Tarmo Koppel, Lennart Hardell
Author Information
  1. Lena K Hedendahl: Independent Environment and Health Research Luleå, Sweden.
  2. Michael Carlberg: Department of Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University Hospital, Örebro, Sweden.
  3. Tarmo Koppel: Department of Work Environment and Safety, Tallinn University of Technology, Tallinn, Estonia.
  4. Lennart Hardell: Department of Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University Hospital, Örebro, Sweden.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Wireless access to the Internet is now commonly used in schools. Many schools give each student their own laptop and utilize the laptops and wireless fidelity (Wi-Fi) connection for educational purposes. Most children also bring their own mobile phones to school. Since children are obliged by law to attend school, a safe environment is important. Lately, it has been discussed if radiofrequency (RF) radiation can have long-term adverse effects on children's health.
METHOD: This study conducted exposimetric measurements in schools to assess RF emissions in the classroom by measuring the teachers' RF exposure in order to approximate the children's exposure. Teachers in grades 7-12 carried a body-borne exposimeter, EME-Spy 200, in school during 1-4 days of work. The exposimeter can measure 20 different frequency bands from 87 to 5,850 MHz.
RESULTS: Eighteen teachers from seven schools participated. The mean exposure to RF radiation ranged from 1.1 to 66.1 µW/m. The highest mean level, 396.6 µW/m, occurred during 5 min of a lesson when the teacher let the students stream and watch YouTube videos. Maximum peaks went up to 82,857 µW/m from mobile phone uplink.
DISCUSSION: Our measurements are in line with recent exposure studies in schools in other countries. The exposure levels varied between the different Wi-Fi systems, and if the students were allowed to use their own smartphones on the school's Wi-Fi network or if they were connected to GSM/3G/4G base stations outside the school. An access point over the teacher's head gave higher exposure compared with a school with a wired Internet connection for the teacher in the classroom. All values were far below International Commission on Non-Ionizing Radiation Protection's reference values, but most mean levels measured were above the precautionary target level of 3-6 µW/m as proposed by the Bioinitiative Report. The length of time wireless devices are used is an essential determinant in overall exposure. Measures to minimize children's exposure to RF radiation in school would include preferring wired connections, allowing laptops, tablets and mobile phones only in flight mode and deactivating Wi-Fi access points, when not used for learning purposes.

Keywords

References

  1. Bioelectromagnetics. 2014 Apr;35(3):227-30 [PMID: 24375568]
  2. Lakartidningen. 2013 Jan 9-15;110(1-2):16-7 [PMID: 23373178]
  3. Health Phys. 2013 Dec;105(6):561-75 [PMID: 24162060]
  4. Pathophysiology. 2009 Aug;16(2-3):103-12 [PMID: 19345073]
  5. Int J Radiat Biol. 2012 May;88(5):420-4 [PMID: 22348707]
  6. Electromagn Biol Med. 2015 Mar;34(1):37-42 [PMID: 24460421]
  7. Int J Epidemiol. 2010 Jun;39(3):675-94 [PMID: 20483835]
  8. JAMA Pediatr. 2016 Dec 1;170(12 ):1202-1208 [PMID: 27802500]
  9. Electromagn Biol Med. 2012 Dec;31(4):250-74 [PMID: 22263702]
  10. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009 Sep 15;106(37):15583-7 [PMID: 19706386]
  11. Int J Radiat Biol. 2015 Jul;91(7):555-61 [PMID: 25775055]
  12. J Clin Diagn Res. 2016 Mar;10(3):ZC82-5 [PMID: 27135009]
  13. Electromagn Biol Med. 2016;35(2):186-202 [PMID: 26151230]
  14. Indian J Ophthalmol. 2014 Jan;62(1):12-5 [PMID: 24492496]
  15. Child Dev. 2017 May 3;: [PMID: 28466466]
  16. Rev Environ Health. 2015;30(4):209-15 [PMID: 26372109]
  17. J Chem Neuroanat. 2016 Sep;75(Pt B):123-7 [PMID: 26723545]
  18. J Pediatr Urol. 2013 Apr;9(2):223-9 [PMID: 22465825]
  19. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2013 Jun 21;10:79 [PMID: 23800133]
  20. Prog Biophys Mol Biol. 2011 Dec;107(3):412-20 [PMID: 21856328]
  21. Acta Paediatr. 2012 Nov;101(11):1170-4 [PMID: 22849438]
  22. Environ Health Prev Med. 2014 May;19(3):187-93 [PMID: 24347468]
  23. Brain Res. 2015 Mar 19;1601:92-101 [PMID: 25598203]
  24. Health Phys. 2014 Dec;107(6):503-13 [PMID: 25353235]
  25. Int J Toxicol. 2015 May-Jun;34(3):284-90 [PMID: 25749756]
  26. Electromagn Biol Med. 2012 Dec;31(4):416-24 [PMID: 22989106]
  27. BMC Public Health. 2010 Feb 12;10:66 [PMID: 20152023]
  28. Occup Environ Med. 2014 Jul;71(7):514-22 [PMID: 24816517]
  29. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2012 Jun;66(6):524-9 [PMID: 21138897]
  30. JAMA. 2011 Feb 23;305(8):808-13 [PMID: 21343580]
  31. Int J Oncol. 2011 May;38(5):1465-74 [PMID: 21331446]
  32. Rev Environ Health. 2013;28(4):159-72 [PMID: 24280284]
  33. Biomed Res Int. 2017;2017:9218486 [PMID: 28401165]
  34. Radiat Prot Dosimetry. 2017 Aug 1;175(4):432-439 [PMID: 28074013]
  35. Pathophysiology. 2015 Mar;22(1):1-13 [PMID: 25466607]
  36. Environ Health Perspect. 2003 Jun;111(7):881-3; discussion A408 [PMID: 12782486]
  37. J Pediatr Psychol. 2012 Oct;37(9):1023-30 [PMID: 22728900]
  38. J Chem Neuroanat. 2016 Sep;75(Pt B):116-22 [PMID: 26775760]
  39. Eur J Prev Cardiol. 2016 Jun;23(9):967-74 [PMID: 26635358]
  40. Neurotoxicology. 2015 Dec;51:158-65 [PMID: 26511840]
  41. Environ Int. 2016 Jan;86:75-83 [PMID: 26540087]
  42. Pers Soc Psychol Rev. 2011 May;15(2):180-98 [PMID: 20688954]
  43. Cell Biochem Biophys. 2015 Sep;73(1):93-100 [PMID: 25672490]
  44. Lancet Oncol. 2011 Jul;12(7):624-6 [PMID: 21845765]
  45. Health Phys. 1998 Apr;74(4):494-522 [PMID: 9525427]
  46. Fertil Steril. 2012 Jan;97(1):39-45.e2 [PMID: 22112647]
  47. Pediatr Endocrinol Rev. 2015 Dec;13(2):531-45 [PMID: 26841641]
  48. Environ Int. 2016 Jul-Aug;92-93:388-97 [PMID: 27136346]
  49. Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 2010 Aug;83(6):691-702 [PMID: 20145945]
  50. Radiat Res. 2015 Dec;184(6):568-77 [PMID: 26600173]
  51. J Behav Addict. 2014 Dec;3(4):254-65 [PMID: 25595966]
  52. Prog Biophys Mol Biol. 2013 Jan;111(1):30-6 [PMID: 23085070]
  53. Int J Public Health. 2016 Apr;61(3):307-15 [PMID: 26450576]
  54. Eur J Epidemiol. 2010 Feb;25(2):135-41 [PMID: 19960235]
  55. Bioelectromagnetics. 2011 Jan;32(1):4-14 [PMID: 20857453]
  56. Bioelectromagnetics. 2008 Apr;29(3):219-32 [PMID: 18044737]
  57. Rev Environ Health. 2013;28(2-3):97-106 [PMID: 24192496]
  58. Sleep. 2011 Aug 01;34(8):1013-20 [PMID: 21804663]
  59. Int J Oncol. 2016 Oct;49(4):1315-1324 [PMID: 27633090]
  60. Biomed Res Int. 2015;2015:272460 [PMID: 25879021]
  61. Bioelectromagnetics. 2016 Jan;37(1):25-36 [PMID: 26769168]
  62. IARC Monogr Eval Carcinog Risks Hum. 2013;102(Pt 2):1-460 [PMID: 24772662]
  63. Psychon Bull Rev. 2013 Dec;20(6):1274-81 [PMID: 23722949]
  64. Health Phys. 2011 Jun;100(6):594-612 [PMID: 22004929]
  65. J Integr Neurosci. 2011 Jun;10(2):189-202 [PMID: 21714138]
  66. Environ Health Perspect. 2010 Mar;118(3):394-9 [PMID: 20064781]
  67. Int J Radiat Biol. 2006 Jun;82(6):443-50 [PMID: 16846979]
  68. Radiat Prot Dosimetry. 2015 Jan;163(1):70-80 [PMID: 24723195]
  69. Mol Clin Oncol. 2017 Apr;6(4):462-476 [PMID: 28413651]
  70. Environ Toxicol Pharmacol. 2015 Sep;40(2):600-5 [PMID: 26356390]
  71. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2016 May 23;:null [PMID: 27217533]
  72. Environ Int. 2017 Feb;99:303-314 [PMID: 28038972]
  73. Prog Biophys Mol Biol. 2013 Nov;113(2):254-63 [PMID: 23872299]
  74. J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol. 2017 Sep;27(5):497-504 [PMID: 27759027]

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0exposureschoolsWi-FischoolRFradiationaccessusedwirelesschildrenmobilechildren'smeasurementsmeanInternetlaptopsfidelityconnectionpurposesphonesradiofrequencycanhealthexposimetricclassroomexposimeterdifferent1levelteacherstudentslevelswiredvaluesRadiationINTRODUCTION:WirelessnowcommonlyManygivestudentlaptoputilizeeducationalalsobringSinceobligedlawattendsafeenvironmentimportantLatelydiscussedlong-termadverseeffectsMETHOD:studyconductedassessemissionsmeasuringteachers'orderapproximateTeachersgrades7-12carriedbody-borneEME-Spy2001-4 daysworkmeasure20frequencybands875850 MHzRESULTS:Eighteenteacherssevenparticipatedranged661 µW/mhighest3966 µW/moccurred5 minlessonletstreamwatchYouTubevideosMaximumpeakswent82857 µW/mphoneuplinkDISCUSSION:linerecentstudiescountriesvariedsystemsallowedusesmartphonesschool'snetworkconnectedGSM/3G/4Gbasestationsoutsidepointteacher'sheadgavehighercomparedfarInternationalCommissionNon-IonizingProtection'sreferencemeasuredprecautionarytarget3-6 µW/mproposedBioinitiativeReportlengthtimedevicesessentialdeterminantoverallMeasuresminimizeincludepreferringconnectionsallowingtabletsflightmodedeactivatingpointslearningMeasurementsRadiofrequencyBody-BorneExposimeterSwedishSchools

Similar Articles

Cited By