Negative affect, message reactance and perceived risk: how do pictorial cigarette pack warnings change quit intentions?

Marissa G Hall, Paschal Sheeran, Seth M Noar, Marcella H Boynton, Kurt M Ribisl, Humberto Parada, Trent O Johnson, Noel T Brewer
Author Information
  1. Marissa G Hall: Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA.
  2. Paschal Sheeran: Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA.
  3. Seth M Noar: Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA.
  4. Marcella H Boynton: Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA.
  5. Kurt M Ribisl: Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA.
  6. Humberto Parada: Department of Epidemiology, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA.
  7. Trent O Johnson: Stanford Prevention Research Center, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, California, USA.
  8. Noel T Brewer: Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Pictorial warnings on cigarette packs increase motivation to quit smoking. We sought to examine the potential mediating role of negative affect, message reactance (ie, an oppositional reaction to a message) and perceived risk in shaping quit intentions.
METHODS: In 2014 and 2015, we randomly assigned 2149 adult US smokers to receive either pictorial warnings or text-only warnings applied to their cigarette packs for 4 weeks. Analyses used structural equation modelling with bootstrapped SEs to test our theorised mediational model.
FINDINGS: Pictorial warnings increased negative affect, message reactance and quit intentions (all P<0.001), but not perceived risk (ie, perceived likelihood and severity of harms of smoking). Negative affect mediated the impact of pictorial warnings on quit intentions (mediated effect=0.16, P<0.001). Message reactance weakened the impact of pictorial warnings on quit intentions, although the effect was small (mediated effect=-0.04, P<0.001). Although pictorial warnings did not directly influence perceived risk, the model showed additional small mediation effects on quit intentions through negative affect and its association with perceived risk (mediated effect=0.02, P<0.001), as well as reactance and its association with perceived risk (mediated effect=-0.01, P<0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: Pictorial cigarette pack warnings increased quit intentions by increasing negative affect. Message reactance partially attenuated this increase in intentions. The opposing associations of negative affect and reactance on perceived risk may explain why pictorial warnings did not lead to observable changes in perceived risk.

Keywords

References

  1. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2016 Dec 16;13(12): [PMID: 27999280]
  2. Tob Control. 2016 Mar;25(2):153-9 [PMID: 25564282]
  3. Am J Health Behav. 2012 Sep;36(5):681-92 [PMID: 22584095]
  4. J Pers Soc Psychol. 2001 Jul;81(1):146-59 [PMID: 11474720]
  5. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1993 May;64(5):740-52 [PMID: 8505705]
  6. J Adolesc Health. 2016 Dec;59(6):635-641 [PMID: 27646499]
  7. Tob Control. 2015 Mar;24(e1):e14-22 [PMID: 23624558]
  8. Psychol Bull. 2013 Jan;139(1):255-263 [PMID: 23294094]
  9. Risk Anal. 2004 Apr;24(2):311-22 [PMID: 15078302]
  10. Health Educ Res. 2015 Feb;30(1):46-56 [PMID: 24974219]
  11. Health Psychol. 2007 Mar;26(2):136-45 [PMID: 17385964]
  12. Food Drug Law J. 2017;72(3):386-405 [PMID: 29398886]
  13. Psychol Health. 2018 Jan;33(1):98-116 [PMID: 28488897]
  14. Tob Control. 2015 May;24(3):225-32 [PMID: 25564288]
  15. Soc Sci Med. 2016 Sep;164:118-129 [PMID: 27423739]
  16. Psychol Sci. 2003 Mar;14(2):144-50 [PMID: 12661676]
  17. Psychol Bull. 1990 Mar;107(2):238-46 [PMID: 2320703]
  18. Prev Sci. 2000 Dec;1(4):173-81 [PMID: 11523746]
  19. Cornell Law Rev. 2014;99(3):513-69 [PMID: 24745102]
  20. PLoS One. 2016 Jul 13;11(7):e0159245 [PMID: 27411100]
  21. J Psychol. 1975 Sep;91(1):93-114 [PMID: 28136248]
  22. Ann Behav Med. 2016 Oct;50(5):736-750 [PMID: 27333895]
  23. Multivariate Behav Res. 1990 Apr 1;25(2):173-80 [PMID: 26794479]
  24. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1966 Nov;4(5):525-31 [PMID: 5972084]
  25. JAMA Intern Med. 2016 Jul 1;176(7):905-12 [PMID: 27273839]
  26. J Behav Med. 2017 Jun;40(3):520-529 [PMID: 28120228]
  27. Psychol Health. 2018 Feb;33(2):213-234 [PMID: 28385093]
  28. Nicotine Tob Res. 2014 Mar;16(3):263-9 [PMID: 23946325]
  29. Health Psychol. 2014 Nov;33(11):1410-20 [PMID: 24977309]
  30. Ann Behav Med. 2009 Dec;38(3):256-61 [PMID: 20049660]
  31. Ann Behav Med. 2018 Jan 5;52(1):53-64 [PMID: 28488230]
  32. Perspect Psychol Sci. 2006 Mar;1(1):28-58 [PMID: 26151184]
  33. Tob Control. 2016 May;25(3):341-54 [PMID: 25948713]
  34. Psychol Bull. 2014 Mar;140(2):511-43 [PMID: 23731175]
  35. PLoS One. 2015 Dec 16;10(12):e0142879 [PMID: 26672982]
  36. Am J Prev Med. 2013 Sep;45(3):334-42 [PMID: 23953361]

Grants

  1. F31 CA196037/NCI NIH HHS
  2. P30 CA016086/NCI NIH HHS
  3. P50 CA180907/NCI NIH HHS
  4. T32 CA057726/NCI NIH HHS

MeSH Term

Adult
Affect
Cognition
Emotions
Humans
Motivation
Photic Stimulation
Product Labeling
Smoking Cessation
Tobacco Products
Visual Perception

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0warningsperceivedquitaffectreactanceriskintentionspictorialnegativeP<0001mediatedcigarettemessagePictorialpacksincreasesmokingiemodelincreasedNegativeimpacteffect=0Messagesmalleffect=-0associationpackOBJECTIVE:motivationsoughtexaminepotentialmediatingroleoppositionalreactionshapingMETHODS:20142015randomlyassigned2149adultUSsmokersreceiveeithertext-onlyapplied4 weeksAnalysesusedstructuralequationmodellingbootstrappedSEstesttheorisedmediationalFINDINGS:likelihoodseverityharms16weakenedalthougheffect04Althoughdirectlyinfluenceshowedadditionalmediationeffects02well01CONCLUSIONS:increasingpartiallyattenuatedopposingassociationsmayexplainleadobservablechangesrisk:changeintentions?cessationpackaginglabellingpublicpolicy

Similar Articles

Cited By