In defence of model-based inference in phylogeography.

Mark A Beaumont, Rasmus Nielsen, Christian Robert, Jody Hey, Oscar Gaggiotti, Lacey Knowles, Arnaud Estoup, Mahesh Panchal, Jukka Corander, Mike Hickerson, Scott A Sisson, Nelson Fagundes, Lounès Chikhi, Peter Beerli, Renaud Vitalis, Jean-Marie Cornuet, John Huelsenbeck, Matthieu Foll, Ziheng Yang, Francois Rousset, David Balding, Laurent Excoffier
Author Information
  1. Mark A Beaumont: School of Animal and Microbial Sciences, University of Reading, Whiteknights, PO Box 228, Reading, RG6 6AJ, UK.
  2. Rasmus Nielsen: Integrative Biology, UC Berkeley, 3060 Valley Life Sciences Bldg #3140, Berkeley, CA 94720-3140, USA.
  3. Christian Robert: CEREMADE, Université Paris Dauphine, Paris, France.
  4. Jody Hey: Department of Genetics, Rutgers University, 604 Allison Road, Piscataway, NJ 08854, USA.
  5. Oscar Gaggiotti: Laboratoire d'Ecologie Alpine, UMR CNRS 5553, Université Joseph Fourier, BP 53, 38041 GRENOBLE, France.
  6. Lacey Knowles: Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, Museum of Zoology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109-1079, USA.
  7. Arnaud Estoup: INRA UMR Centre de Biologie et de Gestion des Populations (INRA ⁄ IRD ⁄ Cirad ⁄ Montpellier SupAgro), Campus international de Baillarguet, Montferrier-sur-Lez, France.
  8. Mahesh Panchal: Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Biology, August-Thienemann-Str. 2, 24306 Plön, Germany.
  9. Jukka Corander: Department of Mathematics and statistics, University of Helsinki, Finland.
  10. Mike Hickerson: Biology Department, Queens College, City University of New York, 65-30 Kissena Boulevard, Flushing, NY 11367-1597, USA.
  11. Scott A Sisson: School of Mathematics and Statistics, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia.
  12. Nelson Fagundes: Departamento de Genética, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil.
  13. Lounès Chikhi: Université Paul Sabatier-UMR EDB 5174 118, 31062 Toulouse Cedex 09, France.
  14. Peter Beerli: Department of Scientific Computing, Florida State University, Tallahassee, FL 32306, USA.
  15. Renaud Vitalis: CNRS-INRA, CBGP, Campus International de Baillarguet, CS 30016, 34988 Montferrier-sur-Lez, France.
  16. Jean-Marie Cornuet: INRA UMR Centre de Biologie et de Gestion des Populations (INRA ⁄ IRD ⁄ Cirad ⁄ Montpellier SupAgro), Campus international de Baillarguet, Montferrier-sur-Lez, France.
  17. John Huelsenbeck: Integrative Biology, UC Berkeley, 3060 Valley Life Sciences Bldg #3140, Berkeley, CA 94720-3140, USA.
  18. Matthieu Foll: CMPG, Institute of Ecology and Evolution, University of Berne, 3012 Berne, Switzerland.
  19. Ziheng Yang: Department of Biology, University College London, Gower Street, London WC1E 6BT, UK.
  20. Francois Rousset: Institut des Sciences de l'Évolution, Universté Montpellier 2, CNRS, Place Eugène Bataillon, CC065, Montpellier, Cedex 5, France.
  21. David Balding: Institute of Genetics, University College London, 2nd Floor, Kathleen Lonsdale Building, 5 Gower Place, London WC1E 6BT, UK.
  22. Laurent Excoffier: CMPG, Institute of Ecology and Evolution, University of Berne, 3012 Berne, Switzerland.

Abstract

Recent papers have promoted the view that model-based methods in general, and those based on Approximate Bayesian Computation (ABC) in particular, are flawed in a number of ways, and are therefore inappropriate for the analysis of phylogeographic data. These papers further argue that Nested Clade Phylogeographic Analysis (NCPA) offers the best approach in statistical phylogeography. In order to remove the confusion and misconceptions introduced by these papers, we justify and explain the reasoning behind model-based inference. We argue that ABC is a statistically valid approach, alongside other computational statistical techniques that have been successfully used to infer parameters and compare models in population genetics. We also examine the NCPA method and highlight numerous deficiencies, either when used with single or multiple loci. We further show that the ages of clades are carelessly used to infer ages of demographic events, that these ages are estimated under a simple model of panmixia and population stationarity but are then used under different and unspecified models to test hypotheses, a usage the invalidates these testing procedures. We conclude by encouraging researchers to study and use model-based inference in population genetics.

Keywords

References

  1. Hum Mutat. 2001 Aug;18(2):87-100 [PMID: 11462233]
  2. Mol Ecol. 2009 Mar;18(6):1034-47 [PMID: 19207258]
  3. Genetics. 2003 Aug;164(4):1645-56 [PMID: 12930768]
  4. Trends Ecol Evol. 2009 Jun;24(6):332-40 [PMID: 19307040]
  5. Genetics. 1998 Sep;150(1):499-510 [PMID: 9725864]
  6. Evolution. 2008 Nov;62(11):2713-7 [PMID: 18973487]
  7. Genetics. 2010 Jan;184(1):243-52 [PMID: 19786619]
  8. J Evol Biol. 2004 Jan;17(1):1-10 [PMID: 15000642]
  9. Mol Ecol. 2004 Apr;13(4):789-809 [PMID: 15012756]
  10. Genetics. 2006 Oct;174(2):805-16 [PMID: 16888334]
  11. Mol Biol Evol. 1999 Dec;16(12):1791-8 [PMID: 10605120]
  12. Genetics. 1995 Aug;140(4):1421-30 [PMID: 7498781]
  13. Evolution. 2007 Jun;61(6):1466-80 [PMID: 17542853]
  14. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007 Nov 6;104(45):17614-9 [PMID: 17978179]
  15. Genetics. 2002 Dec;162(4):2025-35 [PMID: 12524368]
  16. Evolution. 2009 Apr;63(4):807-12 [PMID: 19335340]
  17. Genome Res. 2006 Jun;16(6):702-12 [PMID: 16687733]
  18. PLoS Comput Biol. 2009 Aug;5(8):e1000491 [PMID: 19714206]
  19. Mol Ecol. 2008 Apr;17(8):1877-80 [PMID: 18346121]
  20. Genetics. 2005 Mar;169(3):1727-38 [PMID: 15654099]
  21. Genetics. 2002 May;161(1):469-71; author reply 473-5 [PMID: 12051195]
  22. Ann Hum Genet. 1973 Jul;37(1):69-80 [PMID: 4759904]
  23. Genetics. 2006 Jul;173(3):1511-20 [PMID: 16624908]
  24. Genetics. 1995 Jun;140(2):767-82 [PMID: 7498753]
  25. Genetics. 2005 Jul;170(3):1261-80 [PMID: 15520263]
  26. Genetics. 1999 Jun;152(2):763-73 [PMID: 10353916]
  27. J Hum Evol. 2005 Jul;49(1):1-18 [PMID: 15878780]
  28. Genetics. 1983 Oct;105(2):437-60 [PMID: 6628982]
  29. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2003 Dec 23;100(26):15324-8 [PMID: 14663152]
  30. Genetics. 1997 Feb;145(2):505-18 [PMID: 9071603]
  31. PLoS Biol. 2005 Nov;3(11):e339 [PMID: 16216086]
  32. Evolution. 1967 Sep;21(3):550-570 [PMID: 28563688]
  33. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009 Jun 30;106(26):10576-81 [PMID: 19525398]
  34. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007 Feb 20;104(8):2785-90 [PMID: 17301231]
  35. Mol Ecol. 1998 Apr;7(4):381-97 [PMID: 9627999]
  36. BMC Bioinformatics. 2008 Dec 16;9:539 [PMID: 19087322]
  37. Nature. 2002 Mar 7;416(6876):45-51 [PMID: 11882887]
  38. Mol Ecol. 2008 Jun;17(11):2563-5 [PMID: 18482264]
  39. Bioinformatics. 2008 Dec 1;24(23):2713-9 [PMID: 18842597]
  40. Mol Ecol. 2002 Dec;11(12):2623-35 [PMID: 12453245]
  41. Nature. 2008 Nov 6;456(7218):98-101 [PMID: 18758442]
  42. Stat Appl Genet Mol Biol. 2008;7(1):Article26 [PMID: 18764775]
  43. Ann Hum Genet. 1998 Jan;62(Pt 1):61-73 [PMID: 9659979]
  44. PLoS Genet. 2007 Apr 20;3(4):e66 [PMID: 17447846]
  45. J R Soc Interface. 2009 Feb 6;6(31):187-202 [PMID: 19205079]
  46. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007 Feb 6;104(6):1760-5 [PMID: 17264216]
  47. Nat Rev Genet. 2003 Jul;4(7):535-43 [PMID: 12838345]
  48. Evolution. 1983 Jan;37(1):203-217 [PMID: 28568026]
  49. Mol Biol Evol. 1996 Jan;13(1):115-31 [PMID: 8583886]
  50. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009 Aug 25;106(34):14711-5 [PMID: 19706556]
  51. Bioinformatics. 2009 Oct 15;25(20):2747-9 [PMID: 19679678]
  52. Nat Rev Genet. 2006 Oct;7(10):759-70 [PMID: 16983372]
  53. Mol Ecol. 2010 Feb;19(3):431-5 [PMID: 20070519]
  54. Mol Ecol. 2009 Jan;18(2):319-31 [PMID: 19192182]
  55. Science. 1964 Oct 16;146(3642):347-53 [PMID: 17739513]
  56. Genetics. 2009 Apr;181(4):1507-19 [PMID: 19189952]
  57. Mol Ecol. 2008 Jan;17(2):516-8 [PMID: 17956540]
  58. Genetics. 1998 Mar;148(3):1269-84 [PMID: 9539441]
  59. Genetics. 2005 May;170(1):409-17 [PMID: 15716508]
  60. Trends Ecol Evol. 2001 Jul 1;16(7):358-364 [PMID: 11403868]
  61. J Mol Evol. 1981;17(6):368-76 [PMID: 7288891]
  62. Genetics. 2009 Aug;182(4):1207-18 [PMID: 19506307]
  63. Mol Biol Evol. 1988 Sep;5(5):568-83 [PMID: 3193878]
  64. Syst Biol. 2010 Jul;59(4):415-32 [PMID: 20547778]
  65. Evolution. 2007 Jul;61(7):1507-19 [PMID: 17598736]
  66. Genetics. 1992 Oct;132(2):619-33 [PMID: 1385266]

Grants

  1. R01 GM078204/NIGMS NIH HHS

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0populationmodel-basedusedpapersphylogeographyinferenceagesABCargueNCPAapproachstatisticalinfermodelsgeneticsRecentpromotedviewmethodsgeneralbasedApproximateBayesianComputationparticularflawednumberwaysthereforeinappropriateanalysisphylogeographicdataNestedCladePhylogeographicAnalysisoffersbestorderremoveconfusionmisconceptionsintroducedjustifyexplainreasoningbehindstatisticallyvalidalongsidecomputationaltechniquessuccessfullyparameterscomparealsoexaminemethodhighlightnumerousdeficiencieseithersinglemultiplelocishowcladescarelesslydemographiceventsestimatedsimplemodelpanmixiastationaritydifferentunspecifiedtesthypothesesusageinvalidatestestingproceduresconcludeencouragingresearchersstudyusedefencemolecularevolutiongenetics-empiricalgenetics-theoretical

Similar Articles

Cited By