A clinical audit of thrombophilia testing in pediatric patients with acute thromboembolic events: impact on management.

Chakri Gavva, Ravindra Sarode, Ayesha Zia
Author Information
  1. Chakri Gavva: Division of Transfusion Medicine and Hemostasis, Department of Pathology, and.
  2. Ravindra Sarode: Division of Transfusion Medicine and Hemostasis, Department of Pathology, and.
  3. Ayesha Zia: Division of Pediatric Hematology and Oncology, Department of Pediatrics, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX. ORCID

Abstract

Routine testing for inherited and acquired thrombophilia defects is frequently performed in pediatric patients with thromboembolic events (TEEs). No consensus guidelines exist regarding the timing of testing or the type of patients to be tested. The primary objective of our study, therefore, was to determine whether thrombophilia testing during the acute TEE setting affected clinical management in pediatric patients. A secondary aim included estimation of potential harm from thrombophilia testing. We retrospectively reviewed data on all pediatric patients diagnosed with a TEE during a 1-year period. Fifty-two (51%) of 102 patients with a TEE underwent thrombophilia testing during the acute phase, with 26 patients (50%) having a positive test result during the acute phase. Only 12% of patients tested were confirmed to have a thrombophilia eventually, yielding a false-positive rate of ∼7% for testing when performed in the acute setting. There were no changes to the acute management, regardless of a positive or negative result. Testing resulted in unnecessary blood loss in 12 patients younger than 1 year and acute testing cost approximately $82 000. Our data show that thrombophilia testing during acute TEEs in pediatric patients did not impact clinical management. There is also a potential for false-positive tests leading to unnecessary long-term anticoagulation. These findings suggest against thrombophilia testing during acute TEE setting in children.

References

  1. Front Pediatr. 2017 Mar 14;5:50 [PMID: 28352625]
  2. Pediatrics. 2009 Oct;124(4):1001-8 [PMID: 19736261]
  3. Thromb Haemost. 2002 Jul;88(1):155-6 [PMID: 12152657]
  4. Pediatrics. 2000 Aug;106(2):E19 [PMID: 10920175]
  5. J Paediatr Child Health. 2012 Oct;48(10):921-5 [PMID: 22900528]
  6. N Engl J Med. 2014 Aug 14;371(7):685-6 [PMID: 25119624]
  7. Chest. 2012 Feb;141(2 Suppl):e737S-e801S [PMID: 22315277]
  8. J Thromb Haemost. 2013 Jan;11(1):200-3 [PMID: 23114022]
  9. J Pediatr. 2009 Jul;155(1):100-4 [PMID: 19324372]
  10. Circulation. 2008 Sep 23;118(13):1373-82 [PMID: 18779442]
  11. PLoS One. 2016 May 13;11(5):e0155326 [PMID: 27176603]
  12. J Thromb Haemost. 2016 Sep;14 (9):1749-58 [PMID: 27306795]
  13. Circulation. 2006 Jan 17;113(2):e12-6 [PMID: 16418440]
  14. Blood Res. 2014 Jun;49(2):85-94 [PMID: 25025009]
  15. Hematology Am Soc Hematol Educ Program. 2008;:228-35 [PMID: 19074088]
  16. Blood. 2013 Dec 5;122(24):3879-83 [PMID: 24307720]
  17. Stroke. 2010 Dec;41(12):2985-90 [PMID: 20947844]
  18. Am J Hematol. 2014 Dec;89(12 ):1147-50 [PMID: 25293789]
  19. Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2014 Mar;61(3):523-7 [PMID: 24249220]
  20. Br J Haematol. 2010 Apr;149(2):209-20 [PMID: 20128794]

Grants

  1. K23 HL132054/NHLBI NIH HHS

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0testingpatientsacutethrombophiliapediatricTEEmanagementsettingclinicalperformedthromboembolicTEEstestedpotentialdataphasepositiveresultfalse-positiveunnecessaryimpactRoutineinheritedacquireddefectsfrequentlyeventsconsensusguidelinesexistregardingtimingtypeprimaryobjectivestudythereforedeterminewhetheraffectedsecondaryaimincludedestimationharmretrospectivelyrevieweddiagnosed1-yearperiodFifty-two51%102underwent2650%test12%confirmedeventuallyyieldingrate∼7%changesregardlessnegativeTestingresultedbloodloss12younger1yearcostapproximately$82 000showalsotestsleadinglong-termanticoagulationfindingssuggestchildrenauditevents:

Similar Articles

Cited By