Randomized controlled pilot study of an educational video plus telecare for the early outpatient management of musculoskeletal pain among older emergency department patients.

Timothy F Platts-Mills, Allison G Hollowell, Gary F Burke, Sheryl Zimmerman, Joseph A Dayaa, Benjamin R Quigley, Montika Bush, Morris Weinberger, Mark A Weaver
Author Information
  1. Timothy F Platts-Mills: Department of Emergency Medicine and Division of Geriatrics, Department of Medicine, University of North Carolina Chapel Hill, 101 Manning Drive, CB #7010, Chapel Hill, NC, 27599-7010, USA. tplattsm@med.unc.edu.
  2. Allison G Hollowell: School of Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
  3. Gary F Burke: Department of Emergency Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
  4. Sheryl Zimmerman: School of Social Work, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
  5. Joseph A Dayaa: Department of Emergency Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
  6. Benjamin R Quigley: School of Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
  7. Montika Bush: Department of Emergency Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
  8. Morris Weinberger: Gillings School of Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
  9. Mark A Weaver: Department of Biostatistics, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Musculoskeletal pain is a common reason for emergency department (ED) visits. Following discharge from the ED, patients, particularly older patients, often have difficulty controlling their pain and managing analgesic side effects. We conducted a pilot study of an educational video about pain management with and without follow-up telephone support for older adults presenting to the ED with musculoskeletal pain.
METHODS: ED patients aged 50 years and older with musculoskeletal pain were randomized to: (1) usual care, (2) a brief educational video only, or (3) a brief educational video plus a protocol-guided follow-up telephone call from a physician 48-72 hours after discharge (telecare). The primary outcome was the change from the average pain severity before the ED visit to the average pain severity during the past week assessed one month after the ED visit. Pain was assessed using a 0-10 numerical rating scale.
RESULTS: Of 75 patients randomized (mean age 64 years), 57 (76%) completed follow up at one month. Of the 18 patients lost to follow up, 12 (67%) had non-working phone numbers. Among patients randomized to the video (arms 2 and 3), 46/50 viewed the entire video; among the 25 patients randomized to the video plus telecare (arm 3), 23 were reached for telecare. Baseline pain scores for the usual care, video, and video plus telecare groups were 7.3, 7.1, and 7.5. At one month, pain scores were 5.8, 4.9, and 4.5, corresponding to average decreases in pain of -1.5, -2.2, and -3.0, respectively. In the pairwise comparison between intervention groups, the video plus telecare group had a 1.7-point (95% CI 1.2, 2.1) greater decrease in pain compared to usual care, and the video group had a 1.1-point (95% CI 0.6, 1.6) greater decrease in pain compared to usual care after adjustment for baseline pain, age, and gender. At one month, clinically important differences were also observed between the video plus telecare and usual care groups for analgesic side effects, ongoing opioid use, and physical function.
CONCLUSION: Results of this pilot trial suggest the potential value of an educational video plus telecare to improve outcomes for older adults presenting to the ED with musculoskeletal pain. Changes to the protocol are identified to increase retention for assessment of outcomes.
TRIALS REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02438384 . Registered on 5 May 2015.

Keywords

Associated Data

ClinicalTrials.gov | NCT02438384

References

  1. JAMA. 2006 Oct 18;296(15):1858-66 [PMID: 17047216]
  2. J Gen Intern Med. 2009 Jun;24(6):733-8 [PMID: 19418100]
  3. Acad Emerg Med. 2015 Jul;22(7):856-64 [PMID: 26112797]
  4. Pain. 1999 Nov;83(2):157-62 [PMID: 10534586]
  5. J Gen Intern Med. 2007 Oct;22(10):1453-8 [PMID: 17668269]
  6. Ann Emerg Med. 2016 Feb;67(2):166-176.e1 [PMID: 26092559]
  7. Ann Behav Med. 2003 Aug;26(1):1-7 [PMID: 12867348]
  8. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2013 May;61(5):793-8 [PMID: 23590177]
  9. N Engl J Med. 2017 Feb 16;376(7):663-673 [PMID: 28199807]
  10. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2001 Oct;56(10):M644-9 [PMID: 11584038]
  11. J Gen Intern Med. 2017 Apr;32(4):404-410 [PMID: 28243873]
  12. Med Care. 1992 Jun;30(6):473-83 [PMID: 1593914]
  13. Am J Health Behav. 2007 Sep-Oct;31 Suppl 1:S19-26 [PMID: 17931132]
  14. Med Care. 2002 Sep;40(9):771-81 [PMID: 12218768]
  15. Acad Emerg Med. 2013 Sep;20(9):872-9 [PMID: 24033733]
  16. Am J Prev Med. 2012 May;42(5):525-38 [PMID: 22516495]
  17. BMC Geriatr. 2016 Apr 19;16:86 [PMID: 27094038]
  18. Psychosom Med. 2011 May;73(4):323-35 [PMID: 21536837]
  19. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2013 Sep;61(9):1515-21 [PMID: 24004193]
  20. Acad Emerg Med. 2007 May;14(5):441-7 [PMID: 17456555]
  21. Arthritis Rheum. 2003 Aug;48(8):2207-13 [PMID: 12905474]
  22. Acad Emerg Med. 2016 Mar;23 (3):306-14 [PMID: 26728174]
  23. Singapore Med J. 1999 Dec;40(12):742-4 [PMID: 10709424]
  24. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2016 Apr;64(4):880-1 [PMID: 27100584]
  25. Pain Med. 2009 Oct;10(7):1280-90 [PMID: 19818038]
  26. Acad Emerg Med. 2017 Apr;24(4):458-466 [PMID: 27859997]
  27. JAMA. 2014 Jul 16;312(3):240-8 [PMID: 25027139]
  28. Acad Emerg Med. 2012 Aug;19(8):959-67 [PMID: 22853804]
  29. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2009 May 1;58(16):421-6 [PMID: 19407734]
  30. Eur J Pain. 2006 May;10(4):287-333 [PMID: 16095934]
  31. Am J Geriatr Pharmacother. 2009 Feb;7(1):1-10 [PMID: 19281935]
  32. Exp Aging Res. 2012;38(3):330-43 [PMID: 22540386]
  33. JAMA. 2015 Oct 20;314(15):1572-80 [PMID: 26501533]
  34. Eur J Pain. 2004 Aug;8(4):283-91 [PMID: 15207508]

Grants

  1. K23 AG038548/NIA NIH HHS
  2. K23AG038548/National Institute on Aging

MeSH Term

Age Factors
Aged
Ambulatory Care
Analgesics
Emergency Service, Hospital
Female
Humans
Male
Middle Aged
Musculoskeletal Pain
Pain Measurement
Patient Education as Topic
Pilot Projects
Southeastern United States
Telemedicine
Telephone
Time Factors
Treatment Outcome
Video Recording

Chemicals

Analgesics

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0painvideopatientstelecareED1plusoldereducationalusualcare25musculoskeletalrandomized3onemonthpilotaveragegroups7Musculoskeletalemergencydepartmentdischargeanalgesicsideeffectsstudymanagementfollow-uptelephoneadultspresentingyearsbriefseverityvisitassessedPainagefollowamongscores40group95%CIgreaterdecreasecompared6outcomesBACKGROUND:commonreasonvisitsFollowingparticularlyoftendifficultycontrollingmanagingconductedwithoutsupportMETHODS:aged50to:protocol-guidedcallphysician48-72hoursprimaryoutcomechangepastweekusing0-10numericalratingscaleRESULTS:75mean645776%completed18lost1267%non-workingphonenumbersAmongarms46/50viewedentire25arm23reachedBaseline89correspondingdecreases-1-2-3respectivelypairwisecomparisonintervention7-point1-pointadjustmentbaselinegenderclinicallyimportantdifferencesalsoobservedongoingopioidusephysicalfunctionCONCLUSION:ResultstrialsuggestpotentialvalueimproveChangesprotocolidentifiedincreaseretentionassessmentTRIALSREGISTRATION:ClinicalTrialsgovNCT02438384RegisteredMay2015RandomizedcontrolledearlyoutpatientEmergencymedicineGeriatrics

Similar Articles

Cited By