Children with dyslexia show a reduced processing benefit from bimodal speech information compared to their typically developing peers.

Gesa Schaadt, Elke van der Meer, Ann Pannekamp, Regine Oberecker, Claudia Männel
Author Information
  1. Gesa Schaadt: Department of Neuropsychology, Max Planck Institute for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences, Stephanstr. 1a, 04103 Leipzig, Germany; Department of Neurology, Max Planck Institute for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences, Stephanstr. 1a, 04103 Leipzig, Germany; Clinic for Cognitive Neurology, Medical Faculty, Leipzig University, Liebigstr. 16, 04103 Leipzig, Germany; Department of Psychology, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Rudower Chaussee 18, 12489 Berlin, Germany. Electronic address: schaadt@cbs.mpg.de.
  2. Elke van der Meer: Department of Psychology, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Rudower Chaussee 18, 12489 Berlin, Germany; Graduate School of Mind and Brain Berlin, Luisenstraße 56, 10117 Berlin, Germany.
  3. Ann Pannekamp: Department of Psychology, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Rudower Chaussee 18, 12489 Berlin, Germany.
  4. Regine Oberecker: Department of Neuropsychology, Max Planck Institute for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences, Stephanstr. 1a, 04103 Leipzig, Germany.
  5. Claudia Männel: Department of Neuropsychology, Max Planck Institute for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences, Stephanstr. 1a, 04103 Leipzig, Germany; Department of Neurology, Max Planck Institute for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences, Stephanstr. 1a, 04103 Leipzig, Germany; Clinic for Cognitive Neurology, Medical Faculty, Leipzig University, Liebigstr. 16, 04103 Leipzig, Germany.

Abstract

During information processing, individuals benefit from bimodally presented input, as has been demonstrated for speech perception (i.e., printed letters and speech sounds) or the perception of emotional expressions (i.e., facial expression and voice tuning). While typically developing individuals show this bimodal benefit, school children with dyslexia do not. Currently, it is unknown whether the bimodal processing deficit in dyslexia also occurs for visual-auditory speech processing that is independent of reading and spelling acquisition (i.e., no letter-sound knowledge is required). Here, we tested school children with and without spelling problems on their bimodal perception of video-recorded mouth movements pronouncing syllables. We analyzed the event-related potential Mismatch Response (MMR) to visual-auditory speech information and compared this response to the MMR to monomodal speech information (i.e., auditory-only, visual-only). We found a reduced MMR with later onset to visual-auditory speech information in children with spelling problems compared to children without spelling problems. Moreover, when comparing bimodal and monomodal speech perception, we found that children without spelling problems showed significantly larger responses in the visual-auditory experiment compared to the visual-only response, whereas children with spelling problems did not. Our results suggest that children with dyslexia exhibit general difficulties in bimodal speech perception independently of letter-speech sound knowledge, as apparent in altered bimodal speech perception and lacking benefit from bimodal information. This general deficit in children with dyslexia may underlie the previously reported reduced bimodal benefit for letter-speech sound combinations and similar findings in emotion perception.

Keywords

MeSH Term

Cerebral Cortex
Child
Child Development
Cohort Studies
Dyslexia
Electroencephalography
Evoked Potentials
Female
Humans
Male
Speech Perception
Visual Perception

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0speechbimodalchildrenperceptioninformationspellingbenefitdyslexiaproblemsprocessingievisual-auditorycomparedwithoutMMRreducedindividualstypicallydevelopingshowschooldeficitknowledgeMismatchResponseresponsemonomodalvisual-onlyfoundgeneralletter-speechsoundVisual-auditorybimodallypresentedinputdemonstratedprintedletterssoundsemotionalexpressionsfacialexpressionvoicetuningCurrentlyunknownwhetheralsooccursindependentreadingacquisitionletter-soundrequiredtestedvideo-recordedmouthmovementspronouncingsyllablesanalyzedevent-relatedpotentialauditory-onlylateronsetMoreovercomparingshowedsignificantlylargerresponsesexperimentwhereasresultssuggestexhibitdifficultiesindependentlyapparentalteredlackingmayunderliepreviouslyreportedcombinationssimilarfindingsemotionChildrenpeersGermanlanguageSchoolSpellingabilities

Similar Articles

Cited By