The relationship between leadership and physician well-being: a scoping review.

Anthony J Montgomery
Author Information
  1. Anthony J Montgomery: Department of Education and Social Policy, University of Macedonia, Thessaloniki, Greece.

Abstract

To date, research has established the individual and organizational factors that impair well-being. Thus, we are aware of the organizational "cogs and wheels" that drive well-being, and there is a sense that we can potentially utilize effective leadership to push and pull these in the appropriate directions. However, reviews of leadership in health care point to the lack of academic rigor and difficulty in reaching solid conclusions. Conversely, there is an accepted belief that the most important determinant of the development and maintenance of cultures is current - and future - leadership. Thus, leadership is assumed to be an important element of organizational functioning without the requisite evidence base. Medicine is a unique organizational environment in which the health of physicians may be a significant risk factor for inadequate patient safety and suboptimal care. Globally, physicians are reporting increasing levels of job burnout, especially among younger physicians in training. Not surprisingly, higher levels of physician burnout are associated with suboptimal care for patients and medical error, as well as maladaptive coping strategies among physicians that serve to exacerbate the former. This review is a scoping analysis of the existing literature to address the central question: is there a relationship between organizational leadership and physician well-being? The objectives of the review are as follows: 1) identify the degree to which physician health is under threat; 2) evaluate the evidence linking leadership with physician well-being; 3) identify alternative ways to approach the problem; and 4) outline avenues for future research. Finally, enhancing progress in the field is discussed in the contexts of theory, methodology, and impact.

Keywords

References

  1. Ann Emerg Med. 2008 Jun;51(6):714-722.e1 [PMID: 18395936]
  2. Acad Med. 2014 May;89(5):749-54 [PMID: 24667503]
  3. J Grad Med Educ. 2016 May;8(2):256-9 [PMID: 27168899]
  4. Swiss Med Wkly. 2005 Feb 19;135(7-8):101-8 [PMID: 15832226]
  5. Med Educ. 2009 Mar;43(3):274-82 [PMID: 19250355]
  6. Health Care Manage Rev. 2008 Jan-Mar;33(1):29-39 [PMID: 18091442]
  7. Arch Intern Med. 2012 Oct 8;172(18):1377-85 [PMID: 22911330]
  8. JAMA. 2013 Jul 24;310(4):380-8 [PMID: 23917288]
  9. Am J Med. 2003 Apr 15;114(6):513-9 [PMID: 12727590]
  10. Med Teach. 2003 Mar;25(2):155-60 [PMID: 12745523]
  11. J Health Organ Manag. 2016 May 16;30(3):421-40 [PMID: 27119395]
  12. Ann Surg. 2010 Jun;251(6):995-1000 [PMID: 19934755]
  13. J Appl Psychol. 1988 Nov;73(4):727-35 [PMID: 3209582]
  14. Br J Health Psychol. 2013 Sep;18(3):656-62 [PMID: 23607495]
  15. BMJ Qual Saf. 2014 Oct;23(10):814-22 [PMID: 24825895]
  16. Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 2016 Oct;89(7):1059-75 [PMID: 27251338]
  17. Lancet. 2009 Nov 14;374(9702):1714-21 [PMID: 19914516]
  18. Soc Sci Med. 2001 Jan;52(2):203-13 [PMID: 11144776]
  19. Acad Med. 2011 Mar;86(3):369-77 [PMID: 21248599]
  20. Occup Environ Med. 2003 Jan;60(1):27-33; discussion 33-4 [PMID: 12499453]
  21. Acad Med. 2014 Sep;89(9):1295-306 [PMID: 25006708]
  22. Arch Intern Med. 2009 May 25;169(10):990-5 [PMID: 19468093]
  23. Acad Med. 2010 Nov;85(11):1709-16 [PMID: 20881818]
  24. JAMA. 2010 Sep 15;304(11):1173-80 [PMID: 20841530]
  25. Soc Sci Med. 2007 Jun;64(12):2565-77 [PMID: 17451854]
  26. BMJ. 1993 Feb 6;306(6874):361-6 [PMID: 8461681]
  27. JAMA. 2003 Jun 18;289(23):3161-6 [PMID: 12813122]
  28. J Gen Intern Med. 2000 Feb;15(2):122-8 [PMID: 10672116]
  29. J Occup Environ Med. 2008 Aug;50(8):904-15 [PMID: 18695449]
  30. Mayo Clin Proc. 2015 Apr;90(4):432-40 [PMID: 25796117]
  31. Obes Rev. 2011 Jun;12(6):459-69 [PMID: 21366835]
  32. Arch Intern Med. 2005 Dec 12-26;165(22):2601-6 [PMID: 16344417]
  33. J Clin Epidemiol. 2014 Dec;67(12):1291-4 [PMID: 25034198]
  34. Acad Med. 2002 Dec;77(12 Pt 1):1235-40 [PMID: 12480634]
  35. Patient Educ Couns. 2009 Jan;74(1):118-23 [PMID: 18774670]
  36. Health Aff (Millwood). 2010 Feb;29(2):304-11 [PMID: 20075081]
  37. Occup Med (Lond). 2011 Oct;61(7):490-7 [PMID: 21727179]
  38. J Psychosom Res. 2007 Oct;63(4):433-40 [PMID: 17905053]
  39. J Health Organ Manag. 2009;23(6):642-55 [PMID: 20020597]
  40. JAMA. 2014 Dec 10;312(22):2331-2 [PMID: 25490318]
  41. Acad Med. 2013 May;88(5):710-23 [PMID: 23524921]
  42. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2013 Dec 23;11(1):218-48 [PMID: 24366045]
  43. Crit Care Med. 2007 Feb;35(2 Suppl):S106-16 [PMID: 17242598]
  44. Hum Resour Health. 2013 May 10;11:19 [PMID: 23663329]

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0leadershipphysicianorganizationalcarephysicianswell-beinghealthburnoutreviewresearchThusimportant-futureevidencepatientsafetysuboptimallevelsamongwellscopingrelationshipidentifydateestablishedindividualfactorsimpairaware"cogswheels"drivesensecanpotentiallyutilizeeffectivepushpullappropriatedirectionsHoweverreviewspointlackacademicrigordifficultyreachingsolidconclusionsConverselyacceptedbeliefdeterminantdevelopmentmaintenanceculturescurrentassumedelementfunctioningwithoutrequisitebaseMedicineuniqueenvironmentmaysignificantriskfactorinadequateGloballyreportingincreasingjobespeciallyyoungertrainingsurprisinglyhigherassociatedpatientsmedicalerrormaladaptivecopingstrategiesserveexacerbateformeranalysisexistingliteratureaddresscentralquestion:well-being?objectivesfollows:1degreethreat2evaluatelinking3alternativewaysapproachproblem4outlineavenuesFinallyenhancingprogressfielddiscussedcontextstheorymethodologyimpactwell-being:healthcarequality

Similar Articles

Cited By