MRI findings of complications related to previous uterine scars.

Leonor Alamo, Yvan Vial, Alban Denys, Gustav Andreisek, Jean-Yves Meuwly, Sabine Schmidt
Author Information
  1. Leonor Alamo: Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital of Lausanne (CHUV) and University of Lausanne (UNIL) Rue du Bugnon, 46, 1011, Lausanne, Switzerland.
  2. Yvan Vial: Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital of Lausanne (CHUV) and University of Lausanne (UNIL), Rue du Bugnon, 46, 1011, Lausanne, Switzerland.
  3. Alban Denys: Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital of Lausanne (CHUV) and University of Lausanne (UNIL) Rue du Bugnon, 46, 1011, Lausanne, Switzerland.
  4. Gustav Andreisek: Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Institute of Diagnostic and interventional Radiology, University Hospital of Zurich and University of Zurich, Ramistrasse 100, 8091, Zurich, Switzerland.
  5. Jean-Yves Meuwly: Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital of Lausanne (CHUV) and University of Lausanne (UNIL) Rue du Bugnon, 46, 1011, Lausanne, Switzerland.
  6. Sabine Schmidt: Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital of Lausanne (CHUV) and University of Lausanne (UNIL) Rue du Bugnon, 46, 1011, Lausanne, Switzerland.

Abstract

Although the World Health Organization suggests 10-15% as the adequate cesarean delivery rate to assure optimal prognosis for mother and children, cesarean rates have continuously increased worldwide over the last three decades, even in primiparous women. Moreover, uterine scars after myomectomies, complications of obstetrical interventions and more recently, after fetal surgery, are often observed. This review article describes the most commonly seen complications related to prior uterine scars and discusses their imaging findings, with emphasis on the increasing role of Magnetic Resonance Imaging for diagnosis.

Keywords

References

  1. Semin Ultrasound CT MR. 2012 Aug;33(4):347-70 [PMID: 22824124]
  2. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2009 Nov;147(1):3-8 [PMID: 19596507]
  3. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2013 Apr;92 (4):392-7 [PMID: 22881062]
  4. Radiographics. 2008 Nov-Dec;28(7):1905-16 [PMID: 19001647]
  5. Radiographics. 2009 Sep-Oct;29(5):1371-91 [PMID: 19755601]
  6. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2011 Nov 21;11:95 [PMID: 22103697]
  7. Bull World Health Organ. 2012 Jan 1;90(1):30-9, 39A [PMID: 22271962]
  8. Obstet Gynecol. 2006 Jul;108(1):21-6 [PMID: 16816051]
  9. Clin Perinatol. 2008 Jun;35(2):293-307, v [PMID: 18456070]
  10. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2012 Feb;198(2):311-20 [PMID: 22268173]
  11. Obstet Gynecol. 2011 Mar;117(3):525-32 [PMID: 21343754]
  12. Hum Reprod. 1993 Mar;8(3):442-4 [PMID: 8473464]
  13. Hum Reprod. 2003 Oct;18(10):1983-6 [PMID: 14507810]
  14. BJOG. 2010 Jul;117(8):990-6 [PMID: 20536432]
  15. Reprod Health. 2012 Aug 22;9:15 [PMID: 22913663]
  16. Magn Reson Imaging. 2007 Jan;25(1):87-93 [PMID: 17222719]
  17. PLoS One. 2016 Feb 05;11(2):e0148343 [PMID: 26849801]
  18. J Clin Imaging Sci. 2013 Mar 29;3:16 [PMID: 23814688]
  19. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1978 Mar 15;130(6):653-7 [PMID: 637078]
  20. Hum Reprod. 2013 Jul;28(7):1943-52 [PMID: 23644593]
  21. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2011 Sep;205(3):262.e1-8 [PMID: 22071057]
  22. Reprod Health Matters. 2015 May;23 (45):149-50 [PMID: 26278843]
  23. Jpn J Radiol. 2013 Feb;31(2):75-80 [PMID: 23132557]
  24. BJOG. 2013 May;120(6):671-80 [PMID: 23398899]
  25. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2010 Sep-Oct;17(5):555-69 [PMID: 20656564]
  26. Obstet Gynecol. 2006 Jun;107(6):1373-81 [PMID: 16738166]
  27. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2011 Dec;205(6 Suppl):S2-10 [PMID: 22114995]
  28. Obstet Gynecol. 2007 Nov;110(5):1075-82 [PMID: 17978122]
  29. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2003 Mar;21(3):310 [PMID: 12666232]
  30. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2012 Jan;206(1):56.e1-4 [PMID: 21924397]
  31. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2014 Sep;126(3):265-71 [PMID: 24972720]
  32. Eur J Radiol. 2013 Feb;82(2):e51-7 [PMID: 23020968]
  33. Clin Radiol. 1995 Feb;50(2):80-3 [PMID: 7867273]
  34. BJOG. 2010 May;117(6):690-4 [PMID: 20236104]
  35. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2009 May;105(2):131-5 [PMID: 19232595]
  36. BJOG. 2011 Mar;118(4):391-9 [PMID: 21134103]
  37. Clin Radiol. 2014 Aug;69(8):e345-51 [PMID: 24880757]
  38. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2011 Nov;159(1):62-6 [PMID: 21835537]
  39. Lancet. 2011 Apr 16;377(9774):1331-40 [PMID: 21496916]
  40. Australas J Ultrasound Med. 2011 Aug;14 (3):15-18 [PMID: 28191115]
  41. Obstet Gynecol. 2011 Jul;118(1):29-38 [PMID: 21646928]
  42. Radiographics. 2012 Oct;32(6):1693-712 [PMID: 23065165]
  43. BJOG. 2005 Aug;112(8):1061-5 [PMID: 16045518]
  44. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2013 Apr;27(2):221-32 [PMID: 23127895]
  45. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2000 Nov;16(6):592-3 [PMID: 11169360]
  46. Matern Child Health J. 2014 Jan;18(1):250-257 [PMID: 23504133]
  47. Fertil Steril. 2006 Nov;86(5 Suppl 1):S148-55 [PMID: 17055812]
  48. Radiographics. 2012 Sep-Oct;32(5):1463-81 [PMID: 22977030]
  49. Hum Reprod. 1998 Dec;13(12):3347-50 [PMID: 9886512]
  50. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2003 Mar;21(3):220-7 [PMID: 12666214]
  51. Radiol Clin North Am. 2014 Sep;52(5):1117-35 [PMID: 25173662]
  52. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 1999 Aug;66(2):197-204 [PMID: 10468354]
  53. Obstet Gynecol. 2005 Apr;105(4):869-71 [PMID: 15802418]
  54. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2011 Dec;205(6 Suppl):S11-8 [PMID: 22114993]
  55. PLoS One. 2013;8(1):e54588 [PMID: 23372739]

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0uterinescarscomplicationsMRIWorldHealthOrganizationcesareandeliveryrelatedimagingfindingsMagneticUSAlthoughsuggests10-15%adequaterateassureoptimalprognosismotherchildrenratescontinuouslyincreasedworldwidelastthreedecadesevenprimiparouswomenMoreovermyomectomiesobstetricalinterventionsrecentlyfetalsurgeryoftenobservedreviewarticledescribescommonlyseenpriordiscussesemphasisincreasingroleResonanceImagingdiagnosispreviousCesareanEctopicpregnancyresonancePlacentalanomaliesTVUSTransvaginalultrasoundUltrasoundWHO

Similar Articles

Cited By