Internal noise sources limiting contrast sensitivity.

Daphné Silvestre, Angelo Arleo, Rémy Allard
Author Information
  1. Daphné Silvestre: Sorbonne Université, INSERM, CNRS, Institut de la Vision, 17 rue Moreau, F-75012, Paris, France.
  2. Angelo Arleo: Sorbonne Université, INSERM, CNRS, Institut de la Vision, 17 rue Moreau, F-75012, Paris, France.
  3. Rémy Allard: Sorbonne Université, INSERM, CNRS, Institut de la Vision, 17 rue Moreau, F-75012, Paris, France. remy.allard@inserm.fr.

Abstract

Contrast sensitivity varies substantially as a function of spatial frequency and luminance intensity. The variation as a function of luminance intensity is well known and characterized by three laws that can be attributed to the impact of three internal noise sources: early spontaneous neural activity limiting contrast sensitivity at low luminance intensities (i.e. early noise responsible for the linear law), probabilistic photon absorption at intermediate luminance intensities (i.e. photon noise responsible for de Vries-Rose law) and late spontaneous neural activity at high luminance intensities (i.e. late noise responsible for Weber's law). The aim of this study was to characterize how the impact of these three internal noise sources vary with spatial frequency and determine which one is limiting contrast sensitivity as a function of luminance intensity and spatial frequency. To estimate the impact of the different internal noise sources, the current study used an external noise paradigm to factorize contrast sensitivity into equivalent input noise and calculation efficiency over a wide range of luminance intensities and spatial frequencies. The impact of early and late noise was found to drop linearly with spatial frequency, whereas the impact of photon noise rose with spatial frequency due to ocular factors.

References

  1. Vision Res. 1994 Oct;34(19):2493-502 [PMID: 7975288]
  2. Front Psychol. 2014 Jul 11;5:749 [PMID: 25071693]
  3. Vision Res. 1972 May;12(5):825-33 [PMID: 5037705]
  4. Nature. 1955 Dec 31;176(4496):1272 [PMID: 13321882]
  5. Vision Res. 1993 Nov;33(16):2321-36 [PMID: 8273296]
  6. J Vis. 2013 Jan 01;13(6):18 [PMID: 23729769]
  7. J Gen Physiol. 1942 Jul 20;25(6):819-40 [PMID: 19873316]
  8. J Gen Physiol. 1951 Mar 20;34(4):463-74 [PMID: 14824512]
  9. Vision Res. 1986;26(1):45-61 [PMID: 3716213]
  10. Vision Res. 1993 Oct;33(15):2065-72 [PMID: 8266648]
  11. Behav Res Methods. 2017 Aug;49(4):1278-1290 [PMID: 27604602]
  12. J Opt Soc Am. 1956 Aug;46(8):634-9 [PMID: 13346424]
  13. Vision Res. 2011 Feb 23;51(4):408-16 [PMID: 21185855]
  14. J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis. 1999 Mar;16(3):654-68 [PMID: 10069052]
  15. J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis. 1999 Mar;16(3):647-53 [PMID: 10069051]
  16. Optom Vis Sci. 1991 Aug;68(8):574-83 [PMID: 1923333]
  17. Behav Res Methods. 2008 Aug;40(3):735-43 [PMID: 18697669]
  18. J Vis. 2017 Feb 1;17 (2):5 [PMID: 28196375]
  19. J Opt Soc Am. 1948 Feb;38(2):196-208 [PMID: 18901781]
  20. J Physiol. 1957 May 23;136(3):469-88 [PMID: 13429514]
  21. Nature. 1957 Dec 21;180(4599):1403-5 [PMID: 13493537]
  22. J Acoust Soc Am. 1971 Feb;49(2):Suppl 2:467+ [PMID: 5541744]
  23. Vision Res. 1994 May;34(10):1301-14 [PMID: 8023438]
  24. J Opt Soc Am. 1967 Sep;57(9):1082-8 [PMID: 6051762]
  25. Vision Res. 1972 Jan;12(1):89-101 [PMID: 5034636]

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0noiseluminancespatialsensitivityfrequencyimpactcontrastintensitiesfunctionintensitythreeinternalearlylimitingieresponsiblelawphotonlatesourcesspontaneousneuralactivitystudyContrastvariessubstantiallyvariationwellknowncharacterizedlawscanattributedsources:lowlinearprobabilisticabsorptionintermediatedeVries-RosehighWeber'saimcharacterizevarydetermineoneestimatedifferentcurrentusedexternalparadigmfactorizeequivalentinputcalculationefficiencywiderangefrequenciesfounddroplinearlywhereasrosedueocularfactorsInternal

Similar Articles

Cited By (3)