Is the cigarette pack just a wrapper or a characteristic of the product itself? A qualitative study of adult smokers to inform U.S. regulations.

Joseph G L Lee, Paige E Averett, Tiffany Blanchflower, Kyle R Gregory
Author Information
  1. Joseph G L Lee: Department of Health Education and Promotion, College of Health and Human Performance, East Carolina University, Mail Stop 529, 1000 E 5th St, Greenville, NC, United States.
  2. Paige E Averett: School of Social Work, College of Health and Human Performance, East Carolina University, Mail Stop 505, 1000 E 5th St, Greenville, NC, United States.
  3. Tiffany Blanchflower: Department of Interior Design and Merchandising, College of Health and Human Performance, East Carolina University, Mail Stop 505, 1000 E 5th St, Greenville, NC, United States.
  4. Kyle R Gregory: Department of Health Education and Promotion, College of Health and Human Performance, East Carolina University, Mail Stop 529, 1000 E 5th St, Greenville, NC, United States.

Abstract

PURPOSE: In the U.S., tobacco products are now regulated by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA). Litigation has quickly followed. One area of controversy is when a change to the design of the cigarette pack requires approval through FDA's rigorous premarket review process. In this paper, we examine how adult U.S. smokers view the connection between the design of cigarette packs and the characteristics of the cigarettes within.
METHODS: Data for this qualitative study came from six focus groups conducted in March 2017 with adult smokers. Two groups consisted of lesbian, gay, and bisexual (LGB) participants; two groups of participants with less than four years of college education; one group of LGB and straight identity; and, one group of the general population. All groups were selected for regional, gender, and racial/ethnic diversity. Participants (n = 33) represented all nine U.S. Census divisions. We conducted constant comparison qualitative analysis utilizing a grounded theory approach.
RESULTS: Participants' views reflected a belief that pack design is clearly a reflection of the cigarettes within and that a change in the pack signaled a change in the cigarettes. However, some participants felt price was the salient characteristic of cigarettes and design mattered more for enticing young people to smoke.
CONCLUSIONS: Changes in pack design signal changes to the product for smokers. Pack design and changes to pack design are seen as particularly relevant to new and young smokers. These findings provide support for regulations that require assessment of cigarette pack design changes for impacts on public health.

Keywords

References

  1. Health Educ Res. 2015 Feb;30(1):57-66 [PMID: 24966335]
  2. Nicotine Tob Res. 2014 Aug;16(8):1045-9 [PMID: 24638850]
  3. Nicotine Tob Res. 2004 Dec;6 Suppl 3:S341-51 [PMID: 15799597]
  4. Tob Induc Dis. 2002 Jun 15;1(2):97-109 [PMID: 19570250]
  5. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2016 Nov 11;65(44):1205-1211 [PMID: 27832052]
  6. Tob Control. 2018 Mar;27(2):240-242 [PMID: 28432212]
  7. Am J Prev Med. 2011 Jun;40(6):683-9 [PMID: 21565662]
  8. Int J Qual Health Care. 2007 Dec;19(6):349-57 [PMID: 17872937]
  9. Tob Control. 2017 May;26(3):307-315 [PMID: 27255118]
  10. Addiction. 2005 Jun;100(6):837-51 [PMID: 15918814]
  11. Pediatrics. 2010 Apr;125(4):619-26 [PMID: 20231181]
  12. Tob Control. 1997 Autumn;6(3):169-70 [PMID: 9396096]
  13. Tob Control. 2002 Mar;11 Suppl 1:I73-80 [PMID: 11893817]
  14. Addiction. 2013 Sep;108(9):1658-68 [PMID: 23600674]
  15. J Health Polit Policy Law. 2017 Aug;42(4):607-644 [PMID: 27864349]
  16. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Apr 27;4:CD011244 [PMID: 28447363]
  17. Appetite. 2016 Apr 1;99:219-234 [PMID: 26785316]
  18. Nicotine Tob Res. 2016 Nov;18(11):2115-2123 [PMID: 27083215]
  19. J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2003 Dec;12(10):945-51 [PMID: 14709182]
  20. Tob Control. 2011 May;20(3):235-8 [PMID: 21115556]
  21. Tob Control. 2014 Mar;23(2):140-5 [PMID: 23485704]
  22. Tob Control. 2018 Jul;27(4):390-398 [PMID: 28778970]
  23. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2017 Oct 17;14(10): [PMID: 29039769]
  24. J Natl Med Assoc. 2006 Aug;98(8):1296-9 [PMID: 16916127]
  25. Respirology. 2008 Nov;13(6):761-3 [PMID: 18811875]

Grants

  1. R03 CA212542/NCI NIH HHS

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0designpacksmokersUScigarettecigarettesgroupschangeadultqualitativeparticipantschangesproductsFoodDrugAdministrationwithinstudyconductedLGBonegroupcharacteristicyoungproductregulationsPURPOSE:tobacconowregulatedFDALitigationquicklyfollowedOneareacontroversyrequiresapprovalFDA'srigorouspremarketreviewprocesspaperexamineviewconnectionpackscharacteristicsMETHODS:DatacamesixfocusMarch2017Twoconsistedlesbiangaybisexualtwolessfouryearscollegeeducationstraightidentitygeneralpopulationselectedregionalgenderracial/ethnicdiversityParticipantsn=33representednineCensusdivisionsconstantcomparisonanalysisutilizinggroundedtheoryapproachRESULTS:Participants'viewsreflectedbeliefclearlyreflectionsignaledHoweverfeltpricesalientmatteredenticingpeoplesmokeCONCLUSIONS:ChangessignalPackseenparticularlyrelevantnewfindingsprovidesupportrequireassessmentimpactspublichealthjustwrapperitself?informMarketingProductpackagingSmokingTobaccoUnitedStates

Similar Articles

Cited By