Laparoscopic Management of Adhesions Developed after Peritoneal Nonclosure in Primary Cesarean Section Delivery.

Emaduldin Seyam, Emad Moussa Ibrahim, Ayman Moheb Youseff, Eissa M Khalifa, Enas Hefzy
Author Information
  1. Emaduldin Seyam: Obstetrics and Gynecology Department, Minia University College of Medicine, Minya, Egypt. ORCID
  2. Emad Moussa Ibrahim: Obstetrics and Gynecology Department, Minia University College of Medicine, Minya, Egypt.
  3. Ayman Moheb Youseff: Obstetrics and Gynecology Department, Minia University College of Medicine, Minya, Egypt.
  4. Eissa M Khalifa: Obstetrics and Gynecology Department, Minia University College of Medicine, Minya, Egypt.
  5. Enas Hefzy: Microbiology and Immunology Department, Fayoum University College of Medicine, Faiyum, Egypt.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The aim of the current study was to laparoscopically investigate the effects of peritoneal nonclosure on the sites, types, and degrees of adhesions developed after primary caesarean section (CS) in women complaining of secondary infertility after first CS delivery.
STUDY DESIGN: This was a cross-sectional study, where 250 women suffering from secondary infertility after their first CS had been recruited. They had been classified into group I ( = 89), where both the visceral and parietal peritoneum had been left opened; group II ( = 75), where only the parietal peritoneum had been closed; and group III ( = 86), where both peritoneal layers had been closed. Laparoscopy had been used to classify those adhesions according to the location, severity, and their adverse impact on the reproductive capacity.
RESULTS: Both adnexal and nonadnexal adhesions had been found significantly higher in group I, while adnexal types of adhesions were significantly higher after nonclosure of the visceral peritoneum in group II. Laparoscopic tubal surgery performed included tubo-ovariolysis, fimbrioplasty, and neosalpingostomy. Pregnancy rate was found correlating with the adnexal adhesion location and score.
CONCLUSION: Nonclosure of the peritoneum in CS is associated with more adhesion formation, which might adversely affect the future women reproduction.

References

  1. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2006 Sep-Oct;128(1-2):267-9 [PMID: 16716491]
  2. NCHS Data Brief. 2010 Mar;(35):1-8 [PMID: 20334736]
  3. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2002 Feb 10;101(1):31-5 [PMID: 11803097]
  4. BJOG. 2010 Oct;117(11):1366-76 [PMID: 20840692]
  5. J Med Assoc Thai. 2004 Sep;87(9):1007-11 [PMID: 15515998]
  6. J Reprod Infertil. 2016 Apr-Jun;17(2):104-9 [PMID: 27141465]
  7. BJOG. 2006 Mar;113(3):276-83 [PMID: 16487198]
  8. Hum Reprod. 2004 Aug;19(8):1877-85 [PMID: 15178659]
  9. J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2010 Jun;32(6):598-602 [PMID: 20569542]
  10. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2009 Jul;201(1):56.e1-6 [PMID: 19576375]
  11. BJOG. 2002 Jun;109(6):694-8 [PMID: 12118650]
  12. J Obstet Gynaecol. 2007 Feb;27(2):159-60 [PMID: 17454464]
  13. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2008 Jan 23;(1):CD004662 [PMID: 18254057]
  14. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2009 Nov;147(1):3-8 [PMID: 19596507]
  15. J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad. 2015 Jan-Mar;27(1):78-80 [PMID: 26182743]
  16. Obstet Gynecol. 1991 Jun;77(6):818-21 [PMID: 2030849]
  17. J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2006 Aug;32(4):396-402 [PMID: 16882265]
  18. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2003 May 1;108(1):40-4 [PMID: 12694968]
  19. Fertil Steril. 1988 Jun;49(6):944-55 [PMID: 3371491]
  20. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2007 May;196(5):461.e1-6 [PMID: 17466702]
  21. Fertil Steril. 2002 Aug;78(2):424-5 [PMID: 12137887]
  22. Gynecol Obstet Invest. 2008;66(3):162-8 [PMID: 18562796]
  23. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2011 Dec;205(6 Suppl):S19-24 [PMID: 22114994]
  24. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2007 May;196(5):e31-2 [PMID: 17466672]
  25. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2007 Oct 22;7:24 [PMID: 18336721]
  26. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2003 Aug;189(2):609-12 [PMID: 14520243]
  27. Gynecol Obstet Fertil. 2005 Oct;33(10):745-9 [PMID: 16154376]
  28. Obstet Gynecol. 2005 Aug;106(2):275-80 [PMID: 16055575]
  29. J Reprod Med. 2005 Sep;50(9):659-62 [PMID: 16363753]
  30. Fertil Steril. 2008 Nov;90(5 Suppl):S144-9 [PMID: 19007613]
  31. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2006 Aug;94(2):103-7 [PMID: 16784747]
  32. Womens Health (Lond). 2013 Sep;9(5):467-77 [PMID: 24007252]
  33. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2003;(4):CD000163 [PMID: 14583915]
  34. Dig Surg. 2001;18(4):260-73 [PMID: 11528133]

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0groupadhesionsCSperitoneumwomenadnexalstudyperitonealnonclosuretypessecondaryinfertilityfirstvisceralparietalIIclosedlocationfoundsignificantlyhigherLaparoscopicadhesionNonclosureOBJECTIVE:aimcurrentlaparoscopicallyinvestigateeffectssitesdegreesdevelopedprimarycaesareansectioncomplainingdeliverySTUDYDESIGN:cross-sectional250sufferingrecruitedclassified = 89leftopened = 75III = 86layersLaparoscopyusedclassifyaccordingseverityadverseimpactreproductivecapacityRESULTS:nonadnexaltubalsurgeryperformedincludedtubo-ovariolysisfimbrioplastyneosalpingostomyPregnancyratecorrelatingscoreCONCLUSION:associatedformationmightadverselyaffectfuturereproductionManagementAdhesionsDevelopedPeritonealPrimaryCesareanSectionDelivery

Similar Articles

Cited By