Social Network Analysis Identifies Key Participants in Conservation Development.

Cooper M Farr, Sarah E Reed, Liba Pejchar
Author Information
  1. Cooper M Farr: Department of Fish, Wildlife and Conservation Biology, Graduate Degree Program in Ecology, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO, 80523, USA. cooperfarr@gmail.com.
  2. Sarah E Reed: Department of Fish, Wildlife and Conservation Biology, Graduate Degree Program in Ecology, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO, 80523, USA.
  3. Liba Pejchar: Department of Fish, Wildlife and Conservation Biology, Graduate Degree Program in Ecology, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO, 80523, USA.

Abstract

Understanding patterns of participation in private lands conservation, which is often implemented voluntarily by individual citizens and private organizations, could improve its effectiveness at combating biodiversity loss. We used social network analysis (SNA) to examine participation in conservation development (CD), a private land conservation strategy that clusters houses in a small portion of a property while preserving the remaining land as protected open space. Using data from public records for six counties in Colorado, USA, we compared CD participation patterns among counties and identified actors that most often work with others to implement CDs. We found that social network characteristics differed among counties. The network density, or proportion of connections in the network, varied from fewer than 2 to nearly 15%, and was higher in counties with smaller populations and fewer CDs. Centralization, or the degree to which connections are held disproportionately by a few key actors, was not correlated strongly with any county characteristics. Network characteristics were not correlated with the prevalence of wildlife-friendly design features in CDs. The most highly connected actors were biological and geological consultants, surveyors, and engineers. Our work demonstrates a new application of SNA to land-use planning, in which CD network patterns are examined and key actors are identified. For better conservation outcomes of CD, we recommend using network patterns to guide strategies for outreach and information dissemination, and engaging with highly connected actor types to encourage widespread adoption of best practices for CD design and stewardship.

Keywords

References

  1. Conserv Biol. 2009 Feb;23(1):53-63 [PMID: 19016822]
  2. Conserv Biol. 2006 Oct;20(5):1445-56 [PMID: 17002762]
  3. Science. 2010 May 28;328(5982):1164-8 [PMID: 20430971]
  4. Environ Manage. 2014 Nov;54(5):1208-22 [PMID: 25178188]
  5. Conserv Biol. 2007 Feb;21(1):69-78 [PMID: 17298512]
  6. Conserv Biol. 2014 Feb;28(1):258-68 [PMID: 24001140]
  7. Science. 2008 Oct 10;322(5899):225-30 [PMID: 18845749]
  8. Conserv Biol. 2011 Aug;25(4):697-707 [PMID: 21658127]
  9. Ecol Appl. 2017 Jun;27(4):1236-1252 [PMID: 28171704]
  10. Conserv Biol. 2017 Apr;31(2):290-301 [PMID: 27601156]

MeSH Term

Biodiversity
Colorado
Conservation of Natural Resources
Environmental Policy
Humans
Information Dissemination
Ownership
Social Networking

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0networkconservationCDpatternscountiesactorsparticipationprivateCDscharacteristicslandsoftensocialanalysisSNAdevelopmentlandamongidentifiedworkconnectionsfewerkeycorrelatedNetworkdesignhighlyconnectedSocialConservationUnderstandingimplementedvoluntarilyindividualcitizensorganizationsimproveeffectivenesscombatingbiodiversitylossusedexaminestrategyclustershousessmallportionpropertypreservingremainingprotectedopenspaceUsingdatapublicrecordssixColoradoUSAcomparedothersimplementfounddiffereddensityproportionvaried2nearly15%highersmallerpopulationsCentralizationdegreehelddisproportionatelystronglycountyprevalencewildlife-friendlyfeaturesbiologicalgeologicalconsultantssurveyorsengineersdemonstratesnewapplicationland-useplanningexaminedbetteroutcomesrecommendusingguidestrategiesoutreachinformationdisseminationengagingactortypesencouragewidespreadadoptionbestpracticesstewardshipAnalysisIdentifiesKeyParticipantsDevelopmentBiodiversitysubdivisionsPrivateProtectedareaResidential

Similar Articles

Cited By