Preservice Preschool Teachers' Responses to Bullying Scenarios: The Roles of Years of Study and Empathy.

Heqing Huang, Yanchun Liu, Yulu Chen
Author Information
  1. Heqing Huang: Laboratory of Infant and Child Learning and Development, College of Preschool Education, Capital Normal University, Beijing, China.
  2. Yanchun Liu: Department of Psychology, College of Educational Science, Hubei Normal University, Huangshi, China.
  3. Yulu Chen: Department of Psychology, Teachers' College, Beijing Union University, Chaoyang, China.

Abstract

The present study is aim to examine whether preservice preschool teachers' respond differently to physical, verbal and relational bullying, and how their years of study and trait empathy related their responses. There were 242 preservice teachers in the present study. empathy was measured with the self-report Interpersonal Reactive Index; the Bullying Attitude Questionnaire was used to assess their perceptions of incident seriousness, their sympathy toward the victim of the bullying, and their possibility to intervene in the situation. The results revealed that the participants responded most to physical bullying and least to relational bullying. Interestingly, responses to relational bullying tended to decrease during the university period. The empathy dimensions played different roles in the participants' responses to bullying, while cognitive empathy have little relationship with the participants' responses to bullying, emotional empathy played a more complex role in the participants' responses to bullying: empathic concerns moderated the relationship between years of study and responses to bullying, and personal distress negatively predicted the participants' responses to all types of bullying. The implications for bullying intervention and the suggestion for teacher education are discussed.

Keywords

References

  1. Emotion. 2018 Feb;18(1):39-45 [PMID: 28604043]
  2. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1989 Jul;57(1):55-66 [PMID: 2754604]
  3. J Abnorm Child Psychol. 2016 Feb;44(2):381-91 [PMID: 25795012]
  4. J Occup Health Psychol. 2010 Oct;15(4):494-504 [PMID: 21058861]
  5. Emotion. 2017 Oct;17(7):1120-1136 [PMID: 28358556]
  6. Child Dev. 1995 Jun;66(3):710-22 [PMID: 7789197]
  7. BMC Fam Pract. 2014 Jan 23;15:15 [PMID: 24456299]
  8. PLoS One. 2014 May 08;9(5):e96555 [PMID: 24810604]
  9. Int J Psychol. 2014 Oct;49(5):420-4 [PMID: 24818589]
  10. Behav Brain Sci. 2002 Feb;25(1):1-20; discussion 20-71 [PMID: 12625087]
  11. Aggress Behav. 2017 Sep;43(5):483-492 [PMID: 28317120]
  12. Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2016 Jun;42(6):723-37 [PMID: 27036500]
  13. Acad Med. 2011 Aug;86(8):996-1009 [PMID: 21670661]
  14. Child Dev. 2002 Jul-Aug;73(4):1119-33 [PMID: 12146737]
  15. Aggress Behav. 2015 Jul-Aug;41(4):310-21 [PMID: 24888724]
  16. Novartis Found Symp. 2007;278:71-80; discussion 80-96, 216-21 [PMID: 17214311]
  17. Annu Rev Psychol. 2014;65:399-423 [PMID: 23808915]
  18. Clin Teach. 2017 Dec;14(6):441-445 [PMID: 28164429]

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0bullyingresponsesempathystudyparticipants'preservicerelationalteacherspresentpreschoolphysicalyearsEmpathyBullyingplayedrelationshipempathicpersonaldistressaimexaminewhetherteachers'responddifferentlyverbaltraitrelated242measuredself-reportInterpersonalReactiveIndexAttitudeQuestionnaireusedassessperceptionsincidentseriousnesssympathytowardvictimpossibilityintervenesituationresultsrevealedparticipantsrespondedleastInterestinglytendeddecreaseuniversityperioddimensionsdifferentrolescognitivelittleemotionalcomplexrolebullying:concernsmoderatednegativelypredictedtypesimplicationsinterventionsuggestionteachereducationdiscussedPreservicePreschoolTeachers'ResponsesScenarios:RolesYearsStudyconcern

Similar Articles

Cited By (3)