Selective Grazing by a Tropical Copepod () Facilitates Dominance.

Ewaldo Leitão, Kemal A Ger, Renata Panosso
Author Information
  1. Ewaldo Leitão: Graduate Program of Ecology, Federal University of Rio Grande do Norte, Natal, Brazil.
  2. Kemal A Ger: Graduate Program of Ecology, Federal University of Rio Grande do Norte, Natal, Brazil.
  3. Renata Panosso: Graduate Program of Ecology, Federal University of Rio Grande do Norte, Natal, Brazil.

Abstract

Top-down grazer control of cyanobacteria is a controversial topic due to conflicting reports of success and failure as well as a bias toward studies in temperate climates with large generalist grazers like . In the tropical lowland lakes of Brazil, calanoid copepods of the complex dominate zooplankton and co-exist in high abundance with permanent blooms of toxic cyanobacteria, raising questions for grazer effects on bloom dynamics (i.e., top-down control vs. facilitation of cyanobacterial dominance). Accordingly, the effect of copepod grazing on the relative abundance of co-cultured with a eukaryotic phytoplankton () was evaluated in a series of 6-day laboratory experiments. Grazer effects were tested in incubations where the growth of each phytoplankton in the presence or absence of the copepod was monitored in 1 L co-cultures, starting with a 6-fold initial dominance of by biomass. Compared to the no grazer controls, reduced the growth of both phytoplankton, but growth was reduced to negative values while growth continued positively despite grazers. Hence, in a matter of 6 days selective grazing by increased the biomass of relative to by an order of magnitude compared to controls, and thus, facilitated the dominance of this cyanobacterium. To account for the potential effect of allelopathy, we performed a secondary experiment comparing the abundance and growth rate of and in single and mixed co-cultures in the absence of grazers. The growth rate of was unaffected by the presence or relative abundance of , and vice versa, indicating no allelopathic effects. Our results suggest that selectively grazing zooplankton may facilitate cyanobacteria blooms by grazing on their eukaryotic phytoplankton competitors in nature. Given that selective grazers predominate zooplankton biomass in warmer waters, grazer facilitation of blooms may be a common but poorly understood regulator of plankton dynamics in a warmer and more eutrophic world.

Keywords

References

  1. Proc Biol Sci. 2003 Jun 7;270(1520):1209-14 [PMID: 12816661]
  2. Proc Biol Sci. 2006 Jul 7;273(1594):1673-80 [PMID: 16769640]
  3. Front Microbiol. 2017 Aug 08;8:1495 [PMID: 28848513]
  4. Sci Rep. 2016 Oct 13;6:35039 [PMID: 27733762]
  5. Biol Lett. 2006 Jun 22;2(2):194-7 [PMID: 17148360]
  6. Oecologia. 1986 Jun;69(3):334-340 [PMID: 28311333]
  7. Braz J Biol. 2013 Feb;73(1):37-52 [PMID: 23644787]
  8. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2010 Jun 22;107(25):11183-8 [PMID: 20534563]
  9. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2008 Nov 25;105(47):18408-12 [PMID: 19011082]
  10. J Phycol. 2008 Jun;44(3):716-20 [PMID: 27041430]
  11. Trends Ecol Evol. 2009 Apr;24(4):201-7 [PMID: 19246117]
  12. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf. 2017 Jan;135:191-200 [PMID: 27741460]
  13. Microb Ecol. 2013 May;65(4):995-1010 [PMID: 23314096]
  14. Front Microbiol. 2015 Nov 17;6:1254 [PMID: 26635737]
  15. Braz J Biol. 2002 Feb;62(1):93-105 [PMID: 12185928]
  16. Harmful Algae. 2016 Feb;52:34-45 [PMID: 28073469]
  17. Aquat Toxicol. 2013 Jan 15;126:435-41 [PMID: 23010390]
  18. Harmful Algae. 2016 Apr;54:128-144 [PMID: 28073472]
  19. Nature. 2000 Jan 6;403(6765):74-7 [PMID: 10638754]
  20. Curr Biol. 2010 Sep 14;20(17):1557-61 [PMID: 20705465]
  21. Water Res. 2013 Apr 15;47(6):1961-70 [PMID: 23395484]
  22. Environ Microbiol Rep. 2009 Feb;1(1):27-37 [PMID: 23765717]
  23. Microb Biotechnol. 2017 Sep;10 (5):1106-1110 [PMID: 28639406]
  24. Ecology. 1987 Dec;68(6):1863-1876 [PMID: 29357166]
  25. Trends Ecol Evol. 2007 Apr;22(4):198-204 [PMID: 17275948]
  26. Ecology. 2010 Jan;91(1):180-90 [PMID: 20380207]

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0growthgrazercyanobacteriagrazerszooplanktonabundancegrazingphytoplanktonbloomseffectsfacilitationdominancecopepodrelativebiomasscontroltropicaldynamicseffecteukaryoticpresenceabsenceco-culturescontrolsreducedselectiveratemaywarmerTop-downcontroversialtopicdueconflictingreportssuccessfailurewellbiastowardstudiestemperateclimateslargegeneralistlikelowlandlakesBrazilcalanoidcopepodscomplexdominateco-existhighpermanenttoxicraisingquestionsbloomietop-downvscyanobacterialAccordinglyco-culturedevaluatedseries6-daylaboratoryexperimentsGrazertestedincubationsmonitored1Lstarting6-foldinitialComparednegativevaluescontinuedpositivelydespiteHencematter6daysincreasedordermagnitudecomparedthusfacilitatedcyanobacteriumaccountpotentialallelopathyperformedsecondaryexperimentcomparingsinglemixedunaffectedviceversaindicatingallelopathicresultssuggestselectivelyfacilitatecompetitorsnatureGivenpredominatewaterscommonpoorlyunderstoodregulatorplanktoneutrophicworldSelectiveGrazingTropicalCopepodFacilitatesDominanceNotodiaptomuseutrophicationpositiveinteractions

Similar Articles

Cited By