What drives political commitment for nutrition? A review and framework synthesis to inform the United Nations Decade of Action on Nutrition.

Phillip Baker, Corinna Hawkes, Kate Wingrove, Alessandro Rhyl Demaio, Justin Parkhurst, Anne Marie Thow, Helen Walls
Author Information
  1. Phillip Baker: Institute for Physical Activity and Nutrition, School of Exercise and Nutrition Sciences, Deakin University, Geelong, Victoria, Australia.
  2. Corinna Hawkes: Centre for Food Policy, City University London, London, UK.
  3. Kate Wingrove: Institute for Physical Activity and Nutrition, School of Exercise and Nutrition Sciences, Deakin University, Geelong, Victoria, Australia.
  4. Alessandro Rhyl Demaio: Department of Nutrition for Health and Development, World Health Organisation, Geneva, Switzerland. ORCID
  5. Justin Parkhurst: Department of Health Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, London, UK.
  6. Anne Marie Thow: Menzies Centre for Health Policy, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
  7. Helen Walls: Faculty of Public Health and Policy, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Generating country-level political commitment will be critical to driving forward action throughout the United Nations Decade of Action on Nutrition (2016-2025). In this review of the empirical nutrition policy literature, we ask: what factors generate, sustain and constrain political commitment for nutrition, how and under what circumstances? Our aim is to inform strategic 'commitment-building' actions.
METHOD: We adopted a framework synthesis method and realist review protocol. An initial framework was derived from relevant theory and then populated with empirical evidence to test and modify it. Five steps were undertaken: initial theoretical framework development; search for relevant empirical literature; study selection and quality appraisal; data extraction, analysis and synthesis and framework modification.
RESULTS: 75 studies were included. We identified 18 factors that drive commitment, organised into five categories: actors; institutions; political and societal contexts; knowledge, evidence and framing; and, capacities and resources. Irrespective of country-context, effective nutrition actor networks, strong leadership, civil society mobilisation, supportive political administrations, societal change and focusing events, cohesive and resonant framing, and robust data systems and available evidence were commitment drivers. Low-income and middle-income country studies also frequently reported international actors, empowered institutions, vertical coordination and capacities and resources. In upper-middle-income and high-income country studies, private sector interference frequently undermined commitment.
CONCLUSION: Political commitment is not something that simply exists or emerges accidentally; it can be created and strengthened over time through strategic action. Successfully generating commitment will likely require a core set of actions with some context-dependent adaptations. Ultimately, it will necessitate strategic actions by cohesive, resourced and strongly led nutrition actor networks that are responsive to the multifactorial, multilevel and dynamic political systems in which they operate and attempt to influence. Accelerating the formation and effectiveness of such networks over the Nutrition Decade should be a core task for all actors involved.

Keywords

References

  1. Food Nutr Bull. 2015 Dec;36(4):534-48 [PMID: 26531747]
  2. Eur J Public Health. 2015 Oct;25(5):845-8 [PMID: 25931499]
  3. Health Policy Plan. 2012 Jan;27(1):19-31 [PMID: 21292709]
  4. Food Nutr Bull. 2011 Jun;32(2 Suppl):S59-69 [PMID: 21916115]
  5. Health Policy Plan. 2015 Feb;30(1):28-38 [PMID: 24362641]
  6. Child Obes. 2012 Jun;8(3):243-50 [PMID: 22799551]
  7. Lancet. 2013 Aug 10;382(9891):552-69 [PMID: 23746781]
  8. J Public Health Policy. 2009;30 Suppl 1:S161-76 [PMID: 19190572]
  9. PLoS One. 2015 Apr 09;10(4):e0122870 [PMID: 25856089]
  10. Glob Health Action. 2014 Jul 16;7:24763 [PMID: 25034256]
  11. J Public Health Policy. 2011 Nov;32(4):458-75 [PMID: 21654826]
  12. Obes Rev. 2012 Feb;13(2):162-73 [PMID: 21955783]
  13. Soc Sci Med. 2009 Nov;69(9):1402-8 [PMID: 19758736]
  14. BMC Public Health. 2016 Oct 13;16(1):1084 [PMID: 27737707]
  15. Obes Rev. 2013 Mar;14(3):213-21 [PMID: 23171416]
  16. Adv Nutr. 2013 Nov 06;4(6):687-96 [PMID: 24228200]
  17. Food Nutr Bull. 2011 Jun;32(2 Suppl):S92-104 [PMID: 21916118]
  18. Global Health. 2016 May 10;12(1):18 [PMID: 27160250]
  19. Food Nutr Bull. 2011 Jun;32(2 Suppl):S70-81 [PMID: 21916116]
  20. J Health Serv Res Policy. 2005 Jul;10 Suppl 1:21-34 [PMID: 16053581]
  21. Food Nutr Bull. 2015 Dec;36(4):503-19 [PMID: 26472197]
  22. Obes Rev. 2016 May;17(5):397-411 [PMID: 27058997]
  23. Health Policy Plan. 2007 Nov;22(6):363-74 [PMID: 17951318]
  24. Public Health Nutr. 2016 Aug;19(11):2070-8 [PMID: 26443533]
  25. Am J Public Health. 2014 May;104(5):847-53 [PMID: 24625177]
  26. Biomed Res Int. 2015;2015:926159 [PMID: 26380307]
  27. Am J Public Health. 2010 Nov;100(11):2047-52 [PMID: 20864715]
  28. Lancet. 2016 Apr 2;387(10026):1377-1396 [PMID: 27115820]
  29. Health Policy. 2012 Sep;107(1):91-7 [PMID: 22771079]
  30. J Nutr Educ Behav. 2004 Mar-Apr;36(2):90-8 [PMID: 15068758]
  31. Lancet Glob Health. 2016 Jun;4(6):e414-26 [PMID: 27198845]
  32. BMJ Open. 2014 Aug 08;4(8):e004784 [PMID: 25107435]
  33. Health Educ Behav. 2015 Apr;42(1 Suppl):76S-86S [PMID: 25829121]
  34. Disasters. 2013 Oct;37(4):555-78 [PMID: 24007518]
  35. Adv Nutr. 2015 May 15;6(3):278-9 [PMID: 25979494]
  36. Food Nutr Bull. 2013 Sep;34(3 Suppl):S181-94 [PMID: 24261076]
  37. BMC Public Health. 2014 May 10;14:441 [PMID: 24886563]
  38. Can J Diet Pract Res. 2010 Summer;71(2):85-92 [PMID: 20525420]
  39. BMC Med. 2013 Jan 29;11:21 [PMID: 23360677]
  40. Lancet. 2008 Feb 16;371(9612):608-21 [PMID: 18206225]
  41. Food Nutr Bull. 2007 Jun;28(2 Suppl):S323-30 [PMID: 17658078]
  42. Aust New Zealand Health Policy. 2009 Aug 23;6:20 [PMID: 19698170]
  43. Food Nutr Bull. 2011 Jun;32(2 Suppl):S82-91 [PMID: 21916117]
  44. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2009 Aug 11;9:59 [PMID: 19671152]
  45. Health Policy Plan. 2015 Jun;30(5):566-78 [PMID: 24902883]
  46. Food Nutr Bull. 2015 Jun;36(2):231-47 [PMID: 26121704]
  47. Health Policy Plan. 2010 Jan;25(1):39-49 [PMID: 19741052]
  48. Rev Saude Publica. 2016 Aug 11;50:47 [PMID: 27533363]
  49. Soc Sci Med. 2015 Feb;126:119-27 [PMID: 25544383]
  50. Zoonoses Public Health. 2014 Dec;61(8):581-9 [PMID: 24528517]
  51. Implement Sci. 2015 Apr 16;10:49 [PMID: 25885787]
  52. Aust New Zealand Health Policy. 2005 Jul 20;2:17 [PMID: 16029512]
  53. BMC Public Health. 2012 Dec 28;12:1123 [PMID: 23272940]
  54. Lancet. 2007 Oct 13;370(9595):1370-9 [PMID: 17933652]
  55. Health Policy Plan. 2012 Jan;27(1):32-41 [PMID: 21330309]
  56. Public Health Nutr. 2012 Aug;15(8):1483-8 [PMID: 22115416]
  57. Soc Sci Med. 2017 Mar;177:141-149 [PMID: 28161671]
  58. Am J Prev Med. 2012 Sep;43(3 Suppl 2):S130-5 [PMID: 22898162]

Grants

  1. 001/World Health Organization

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0commitmentpoliticalnutritionframeworkreviewwillDecadeNutritionempiricalstrategicactionssynthesisevidencestudiesactorsnetworksactionUnitedNationsActionpolicyliteraturefactorsinforminitialrelevantdatainstitutionssocietalframingcapacitiesresourcesactorcohesivesystemscountryfrequentlycoreINTRODUCTION:Generatingcountry-levelcriticaldrivingforwardthroughout2016-2025ask:generatesustainconstraincircumstances?aim'commitment-building'METHOD:adoptedmethodrealistprotocolderivedtheorypopulatedtestmodifyFivestepsundertaken:theoreticaldevelopmentsearchstudyselectionqualityappraisalextractionanalysismodificationRESULTS:75includedidentified18driveorganisedfivecategories:contextsknowledgeIrrespectivecountry-contexteffectivestrongleadershipcivilsocietymobilisationsupportiveadministrationschangefocusingeventsresonantrobustavailabledriversLow-incomemiddle-incomealsoreportedinternationalempoweredverticalcoordinationupper-middle-incomehigh-incomeprivatesectorinterferenceunderminedCONCLUSION:PoliticalsomethingsimplyexistsemergesaccidentallycancreatedstrengthenedtimeSuccessfullygeneratinglikelyrequiresetcontext-dependentadaptationsUltimatelynecessitateresourcedstronglyledresponsivemultifactorialmultileveldynamicoperateattemptinfluenceAcceleratingformationeffectivenesstaskinvolveddrivesnutrition?health

Similar Articles

Cited By