Prevalence of food insecurity among food bank users in Germany and its association with population characteristics.

Julia Depa, Fiona Gyngell, Annalena Müller, Laila Eleraky, Carolin Hilzendegen, Nanette Stroebele-Benschop
Author Information
  1. Julia Depa: University of Hohenheim, Institute of Nutritional Medicine, Department of Nutritional Psychology, Fruwirthstraße 12, 70599 Stuttgart, Germany.
  2. Fiona Gyngell: University of Hohenheim, Institute of Nutritional Medicine, Department of Nutritional Psychology, Fruwirthstraße 12, 70599 Stuttgart, Germany.
  3. Annalena Müller: University of Hohenheim, Institute of Nutritional Medicine, Department of Nutritional Psychology, Fruwirthstraße 12, 70599 Stuttgart, Germany.
  4. Laila Eleraky: University of Hohenheim, Institute of Nutritional Medicine, Department of Nutritional Psychology, Fruwirthstraße 12, 70599 Stuttgart, Germany.
  5. Carolin Hilzendegen: University of Hohenheim, Institute of Nutritional Medicine, Department of Nutritional Psychology, Fruwirthstraße 12, 70599 Stuttgart, Germany.
  6. Nanette Stroebele-Benschop: University of Hohenheim, Institute of Nutritional Medicine, Department of Nutritional Psychology, Fruwirthstraße 12, 70599 Stuttgart, Germany.

Abstract

The prevalence of food insecurity (FI) among food bank users in many European countries is unknown. The study aims to examine FI prevalence and associated population characteristics among this particular group of disadvantaged people in Germany. food insecurity status was assessed among 1033 adult food bank users with a mean age of 53 years (57% female, 43% male) in Germany in 2015 using the food insecurity experience scale (FIES). About half of the participants (55.8%) were single with no children and born in Germany. Over 37% had a self-reported BMI of 30 kg/m or above and 37.4% indicated to smoke. Over 70% of the food bank users can be described as food insecure. Of those, about 35% were considered mildly food insecure. Almost 30% were categorized as moderately food insecure while over 7% were categorized as severely food insecure. Significant associations with food insecurity were found for gender, age, subjective health status, smoking, duration of food bank use, school education and family type. Among this socially disadvantaged population, food insecurity is highly prevalent and public health efforts should be focusing on this vulnerable population taken into account the identified population and behavioral characteristics associated with food insecurity.

Keywords

References

  1. Public Health Nutr. 2015 Nov;18(16):2952-61 [PMID: 25563304]
  2. Eur J Public Health. 2012 Oct;22(5):721-6 [PMID: 21750012]
  3. Am J Public Health. 2008 Apr;98(4):751-7 [PMID: 17666697]
  4. Appetite. 2013 Jun;65:125-31 [PMID: 23402717]
  5. J Nutr Educ Behav. 2013 Mar;45(2):159-64 [PMID: 23219294]
  6. Forum Nutr. 2005;(57):44-51 [PMID: 15702587]
  7. Prev Chronic Dis. 2016 Oct 13;13:E143 [PMID: 27736055]
  8. Am J Prev Med. 2017 Aug;53(2):264-273 [PMID: 28457747]
  9. BMJ Open. 2014 May 16;4(5):e004657 [PMID: 24838723]
  10. J Community Health. 2017 Jun;42(3):605-611 [PMID: 27837357]
  11. BMC Public Health. 2013 May 20;13:486 [PMID: 23688296]
  12. Aust N Z J Public Health. 2015 Aug;39(4):358-65 [PMID: 25716286]
  13. Public Health Nutr. 2007 Nov;10(11):1288-98 [PMID: 17381905]
  14. Am J Health Promot. 2008 Jul-Aug;22(6):386-92 [PMID: 18677878]
  15. Curr Nutr Rep. 2014;3(4):324-332 [PMID: 25383254]
  16. J Am Diet Assoc. 2007 Nov;107(11):1952-61 [PMID: 17964316]
  17. Can J Public Health. 1999 Mar-Apr;90(2):109-13 [PMID: 10349217]
  18. J Community Health. 2016 Aug;41(4):732-40 [PMID: 26728281]
  19. J Health Soc Behav. 2004 Jun;45(2):171-86 [PMID: 15305758]
  20. BMC Public Health. 2016 Aug 12;16(1):779 [PMID: 27515521]
  21. J Acad Nutr Diet. 2017 Apr;117(4):523-525 [PMID: 28343523]
  22. J Public Health (Oxf). 2017 Mar 28;:1-9 [PMID: 28369526]
  23. Public Health Nutr. 2012 Feb;15(2):227-37 [PMID: 21899791]
  24. J Nutr. 2006 May;136(5):1438S-1448S [PMID: 16614441]
  25. J Nutr. 1990 Nov;120 Suppl 11:1544-8 [PMID: 2243303]
  26. Int J Equity Health. 2015 Nov 24;14:141 [PMID: 26601718]
  27. J Community Health. 2012 Feb;37(1):253-64 [PMID: 21644024]
  28. BMC Public Health. 2012 Sep 01;12:730 [PMID: 22938722]
  29. J Nutr. 2017 Apr;147(4):680-687 [PMID: 28250191]
  30. Tob Control. 2003 Mar;12(1):60-6 [PMID: 12612364]
  31. J Nutr. 2003 Jan;133(1):120-6 [PMID: 12514278]
  32. J Nutr. 1990 Nov;120 Suppl 11:1559-600 [PMID: 2243305]
  33. Prev Chronic Dis. 2009 Oct;6(4):A121 [PMID: 19754997]
  34. Public Health Nutr. 2016 Jun;19(8):1405-16 [PMID: 26441159]
  35. BMC Public Health. 2012 Nov 28;12:1038 [PMID: 23190743]
  36. J Nutr. 2015 Mar;145(3):622-7 [PMID: 25733480]
  37. Prev Med Rep. 2015 Oct 29;2:911-5 [PMID: 26844167]
  38. Annu Rev Public Health. 2006;27:1-28 [PMID: 16533107]

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0foodinsecuritybankpopulationamongusersGermanyinsecurecharacteristicsFoodprevalenceFIassociateddisadvantagedstatusagecategorizedhealthmanyEuropeancountriesunknownstudyaimsexamineparticulargrouppeopleassessed1033adultmean53 years57%female43%male2015usingexperiencescaleFIEShalfparticipants558%singlechildrenborn37%self-reportedBMI30 kg/m374%indicatedsmoke70%candescribed35%consideredmildlyAlmost30%moderately7%severelySignificantassociationsfoundgendersubjectivesmokingdurationuseschooleducationfamilytypeAmongsociallyhighlyprevalentpubliceffortsfocusingvulnerabletakenaccountidentifiedbehavioralPrevalenceassociationuserLowincome

Similar Articles

Cited By (15)