Midwifery students' experiences of learning clinical skills in Iran: a qualitative study.

Golnoosh Ahmadi, Mohsen Shahriari, Mahmood Keyvanara, Shahnaz Kohan
Author Information
  1. Golnoosh Ahmadi: Student Research Committee, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran.
  2. Mohsen Shahriari: Nursing and Midwifery Care Research Center, Adult Health Nursing, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran.
  3. Mahmood Keyvanara: Social Determinants of Health Research Center, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran.
  4. Shahnaz Kohan: Nursing and Midwifery Care Research Center, Faculty of Nursing and Midwifery, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran.

Abstract

METHODS: A qualitative study was used. Midwifery students from three universities in Iran participated. The study used a convenience sample of eighteen students. Data for this study was collected using semi-structured interviews (N=12) and focus groups (N=6). Data were recorded on a digital audio recorder and then transcribed. The qualitative data were analyzed using a content analysis approach.
RESULTS: Six broad themes emerged from the analysis: Limited opportunities to experience skills, difficulties with course plan gaps, need for creating a supportive clinical environment, learning drives, confusion between different methods, and stress in the clinical setting. Short verbatim quotations from the participants were presented to provide evidence for the interpretation of data.
CONCLUSIONS: The findings of this study have provided a clear picture of the factors and mechanisms involved in learning clinical skills by midwifery students. This study showed that students had some difficulties and concerns during learning of clinical midwifery skills. The findings of this study suggest that midwifery educators conduct further studies to tackle these issues in clinical skills learning. The findings of this study are subject to some limitations which are discussed.

Keywords

References

  1. Midwifery. 2011 Aug;27(4):409-16 [PMID: 21550149]
  2. Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 2002;7(1):29-40 [PMID: 11912332]
  3. Midwifery. 1999 Sep;15(3):194-202 [PMID: 10776244]
  4. Nurse Educ Pract. 2015 Mar;15(2):134-40 [PMID: 25661056]
  5. Teach Learn Med. 2009 Apr-Jun;21(2):116-20 [PMID: 19330689]
  6. Nurse Educ Today. 1998 Nov;18(8):601-9 [PMID: 10188463]
  7. Nurse Educ Today. 2004 Feb;24(2):105-12 [PMID: 14769454]
  8. Midwifery. 2015 Jan;31(1):201-7 [PMID: 25277735]
  9. Aust J Adv Nurs. 1994 Mar-May;11(3):26-33 [PMID: 7980880]
  10. Nurse Educ Today. 2015 Dec;35(12):1295-300 [PMID: 26298274]
  11. Midwifery. 2008 Dec;24(4):480-9 [PMID: 17869393]
  12. Midwifery. 2005 Mar;21(1):2-13 [PMID: 15740812]
  13. J Clin Nurs. 2006 Feb;15(2):155-61 [PMID: 16422732]
  14. Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 2002;7(2):153-60 [PMID: 12075147]
  15. J Midwifery Womens Health. 2003 Nov-Dec;48(6):398-406 [PMID: 14660945]
  16. J Clin Nurs. 2001 Mar;10(2):293-300 [PMID: 11820351]
  17. Nurse Educ Pract. 2012 Sep;12(5):264-8 [PMID: 22683107]
  18. J Adv Nurs. 2002 May;38(3):310-7 [PMID: 11972672]
  19. Nurse Educ Today. 2003 May;23(4):262-8 [PMID: 12727093]
  20. Nurse Educ Today. 2013 Oct;33(10):1179-83 [PMID: 22703835]
  21. Nurse Educ Pract. 2015 May;15(3):243-8 [PMID: 25701290]
  22. Midwifery. 2013 Aug;29(8):831-7 [PMID: 23079869]
  23. Int J Clin Pract. 2006 Nov;60(11):1414-8 [PMID: 16787438]
  24. Midwifery. 2011 Aug;27(4):503-8 [PMID: 20478647]

MeSH Term

Attitude of Health Personnel
Clinical Competence
Education, Nursing
Female
Focus Groups
Humans
Interviews as Topic
Iran
Learning
Male
Midwifery
Qualitative Research
Students, Nursing
Workforce

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0studyclinicalskillslearningstudentsmidwiferyqualitativefindingsusedMidwiferyDatausingdatadifficultiesexperiencesMETHODS:threeuniversitiesIranparticipatedconveniencesampleeighteencollectedsemi-structuredinterviewsN=12focusgroupsN=6recordeddigitalaudiorecordertranscribedanalyzedcontentanalysisapproachRESULTS:Sixbroadthemesemergedanalysis:LimitedopportunitiesexperiencecourseplangapsneedcreatingsupportiveenvironmentdrivesconfusiondifferentmethodsstresssettingShortverbatimquotationsparticipantspresentedprovideevidenceinterpretationCONCLUSIONS:providedclearpicturefactorsmechanismsinvolvedshowedconcernssuggesteducatorsconductstudiestackleissuessubjectlimitationsdiscussedstudents'Iran:iranstudents’

Similar Articles

Cited By