Asymptomatic Renal Stones-to Treat or Not to Treat.

Necole M Streeper
Author Information
  1. Necole M Streeper: Division of Urology, Penn State Milton S. Hershey Medical Center, Mail Code H055, 500 University Drive, PO Box 850, Hershey, PA, 17033-0850, USA. nstreeper@pennstatehealth.psu.edu.

Abstract

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: There are no current guidelines on the optimal management of asymptomatic renal stones. This review summarizes the current literature, focusing on more recent studies that have been done to grow the body of evidence on this topic.
RECENT FINDINGS: Recent studies have found that stone size is a significant predictor of need for future surgical intervention, with > 7 mm for pediatric population and > 4 mm for residual fragments after both PNL and ureteroscopy (URS). The role of URS has been better defined with a recent RCT concluding that URS and SWL had comparable outcomes for an asymptomatic lower pole stone < 1 cm. The treatment decision for asymptomatic renal stones should take into consideration a variety of relevant patient and stone factors; however, ultimately, a shared decision-making approach should be used. In the properly counseled patient, active surveillance or prophylactic surgical intervention may be appropriate.

Keywords

References

  1. J Urol. 2016 Oct;196(4):1153-60 [PMID: 27238616]
  2. J Urol. 2005 Mar;173(3):848-57 [PMID: 15711292]
  3. Urolithiasis. 2016 Apr;44(2):167-72 [PMID: 26209009]
  4. Eur Urol. 2012 Jul;62(1):160-5 [PMID: 22498635]
  5. J Urol. 2010 Mar;183(3):1017-21 [PMID: 20092842]
  6. Urology. 2013 Feb;81(2):236-40 [PMID: 23374767]
  7. J Urol. 2015 Apr;193(4):1265-9 [PMID: 25463995]
  8. Pediatr Nephrol. 2017 May;32(5):853-857 [PMID: 28070668]
  9. BJU Int. 2012 Feb;109(4):622-5 [PMID: 21851532]
  10. Curr Opin Urol. 2008 Mar;18(2):214-9 [PMID: 18303547]
  11. J Urol. 2016 Apr;195(4 Pt 2):1289-93 [PMID: 26926554]
  12. Eur Urol. 2016 Mar;69(3):468-74 [PMID: 26318710]
  13. BJU Int. 2001 Jan;87(1):1-8 [PMID: 11121982]
  14. J Urol. 1992 Feb;147(2):319-21 [PMID: 1732583]
  15. J Urol. 2013 May;189(5):1740-6 [PMID: 23201376]
  16. J Urol. 2007 Jun;177(6):2189-92 [PMID: 17509315]
  17. Urology. 2011 Mar;77(3):564-8 [PMID: 21109293]
  18. Urology. 2015 Jan;85(1):33-7 [PMID: 25440816]
  19. Nat Rev Urol. 2012 Mar 27;9(6):315-20 [PMID: 22450602]
  20. J Urol. 2016 Apr;195(4 Pt 1):982-6 [PMID: 26585680]
  21. J Urol. 2014 Aug;192(2):316-24 [PMID: 24857648]
  22. Urology. 2016 Nov;97:46-50 [PMID: 27421779]
  23. J Endourol. 2010 Jun;24(6):923-30 [PMID: 20482232]
  24. J Endourol. 2004 Aug;18(6):534-9 [PMID: 15333216]
  25. J Urol. 2010 Apr;183(4):1424-8 [PMID: 20172565]

MeSH Term

Humans
Kidney Calculi

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0asymptomaticstonesstoneURScurrentrenalrecentstudiessurgicalinterventionfragmentspatientAsymptomaticRenalTreatPURPOSEOFREVIEW:guidelinesoptimalmanagementreviewsummarizesliteraturefocusingdonegrowbodyevidencetopicRECENTFINDINGS:Recentfoundsizesignificantpredictorneedfuture> 7 mmpediatricpopulation> 4 mmresidualPNLureteroscopyrolebetterdefinedRCTconcludingSWLcomparableoutcomeslowerpole< 1 cmtreatmentdecisiontakeconsiderationvarietyrelevantfactorshoweverultimatelyshareddecision-makingapproachusedproperlycounseledactivesurveillanceprophylacticmayappropriateStones-toObservationResidualTreatment

Similar Articles

Cited By