Titration ELISA as a Method to Determine the Dissociation Constant of Receptor Ligand Interaction.

Johannes A Eble
Author Information
  1. Johannes A Eble: Institute of Physiological Chemistry and Pathobiochemistry, University of Münster; johannes.eble@uni-muenster.de.

Abstract

The dissociation constant describes the interaction between two partners in the binding equilibrium and is a measure of their affinity. It is a crucial parameter to compare different ligands, e.g., competitive inhibitors, protein isoforms and mutants, for their binding strength to a binding partner. Dissociation constants are determined by plotting concentrations of bound versus free ligand as binding curves. In contrast, titration curves, in which a signal that is proportional to the concentration of bound ligand is plotted against the total concentration of added ligand, are much easier to record. The signal can be detected spectroscopically and by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). This is exemplified in a protocol for a titration ELISA that measures the binding of the snake venom-derived rhodocetin to its immobilized target domain of α2β1 integrin. Titration ELISAs are versatile and widely used. Any pair of interacting proteins can be used as immobilized receptor and soluble ligand, provided that both proteins are pure, and their concentrations are known. The difficulty so far has been to determine the dissociation constant from a titration curve. In this study, a mathematical function underlying titration curves is introduced. Without any error-prone graphical estimation of a saturation yield, this algorithm allows processing of the raw data (signal intensities at different concentrations of added ligand) directly by mathematical evaluation via non-linear regression. Thus, several titration curves can be recorded simultaneously and transformed into a set of characteristic parameters, among them the dissociation constant and the concentration of binding-active receptor, and they can be evaluated statistically. When combined with this algorithm, titration ELISAs gain the advantage of directly presenting the dissociation constant. Therefore, they may be used more efficiently in the future.

References

  1. Biosens Bioelectron. 2010 Sep 15;26(1):36-42 [PMID: 20605432]
  2. PLoS Biol. 2017 Jul 13;15(7):e2001492 [PMID: 28704364]
  3. Protein Sci. 2010 Oct;19(10):1996-2000 [PMID: 20669180]
  4. Arch Biochem. 1946 Jan;9:109-17 [PMID: 21009581]
  5. Curr Opin Chem Biol. 2001 Oct;5(5):572-7 [PMID: 11578932]
  6. Biochem J. 2003 Nov 15;376(Pt 1):77-85 [PMID: 12871211]
  7. Biochem J. 2011 Nov 15;440(1):1-11 [PMID: 21774787]
  8. Curr Top Med Chem. 2003;3(1):39-53 [PMID: 12577990]
  9. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol. 2011 Jan 01;3(1):a004978 [PMID: 21421911]
  10. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol. 2011 Mar 01;3(3):null [PMID: 21421922]
  11. J Cell Sci. 2016 Feb 15;129(4):653-64 [PMID: 26857815]
  12. J Biol Chem. 1959 May;234(5):1286-92 [PMID: 13654363]
  13. Electrophoresis. 2008 Apr;29(7):1415-22 [PMID: 18324729]
  14. J Biol Chem. 2004 Jan 2;279(1):1-12 [PMID: 14604979]
  15. Anal Biochem. 2016 Mar 1;496:79-93 [PMID: 26739938]
  16. Nature. 2010 Nov 25;468(7323):580-4 [PMID: 21107430]
  17. J Biomed Mater Res A. 2015 Mar;103(3):949-58 [PMID: 24853075]
  18. Anal Biochem. 1985 Sep;149(2):369-78 [PMID: 3907409]
  19. FASEB J. 2009 Sep;23(9):2917-27 [PMID: 19369383]
  20. Curr Opin Biotechnol. 2000 Feb;11(1):54-61 [PMID: 10679342]
  21. Annu Rev Immunol. 2007;25:619-47 [PMID: 17201681]
  22. Methods Mol Biol. 2012;922:155-9 [PMID: 22976183]
  23. Curr Opin Cell Biol. 2006 Oct;18(5):579-86 [PMID: 16904883]
  24. Biochemistry. 1975 Jul;14(13):2962-8 [PMID: 1148186]
  25. Curr Opin Struct Biol. 2001 Oct;11(5):560-6 [PMID: 11785756]

MeSH Term

Crotalid Venoms
Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay
Integrin alpha2
Kinetics
Ligands
Protein Binding
Protein Domains
Receptors, Cell Surface

Chemicals

Crotalid Venoms
Integrin alpha2
Ligands
Receptors, Cell Surface
rhodocetin

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0titrationbindingliganddissociationconstantcurvescanconcentrationssignalconcentrationELISAuseddifferentDissociationboundaddedimmobilizedTitrationELISAsproteinsreceptormathematicalalgorithmdirectlydescribesinteractiontwopartnersequilibriummeasureaffinitycrucialparametercompareligandsegcompetitiveinhibitorsproteinisoformsmutantsstrengthpartnerconstantsdeterminedplottingversusfreecontrastproportionalplottedtotalmucheasierrecorddetectedspectroscopicallyenzyme-linkedimmunosorbentassayexemplifiedprotocolmeasuressnakevenom-derivedrhodocetintargetdomainα2β1integrinversatilewidelypairinteractingsolubleprovidedpureknowndifficultyfardeterminecurvestudyfunctionunderlyingintroducedWithouterror-pronegraphicalestimationsaturationyieldallowsprocessingrawdataintensitiesevaluationvianon-linearregressionThusseveralrecordedsimultaneouslytransformedsetcharacteristicparametersamongbinding-activeevaluatedstatisticallycombinedgainadvantagepresentingThereforemayefficientlyfutureMethodDetermineConstantReceptorLigandInteraction

Similar Articles

Cited By