Intraoperative cell salvage with autologous transfusion in elective right or repeat hepatectomy: a propensity-score-matched case-control analysis.

Thomas Zacharias, Erich Ahlschwede, Nicole Dufour, Florence Romain, Odile Theissen-Laval
Author Information
  1. Thomas Zacharias: From the Service de chirurgie digestive, hépato-biliaire et endocrinienne, Pôle de Pathologies Digestives et Urologie (Zacharias); and the Pôle Anesthésie et Réanimation Chirurgicale, Hôpital Emile Muller, Mulhouse, France (Ahlschwede, Dufour, Romain, Theissen-Laval).
  2. Erich Ahlschwede: From the Service de chirurgie digestive, hépato-biliaire et endocrinienne, Pôle de Pathologies Digestives et Urologie (Zacharias); and the Pôle Anesthésie et Réanimation Chirurgicale, Hôpital Emile Muller, Mulhouse, France (Ahlschwede, Dufour, Romain, Theissen-Laval).
  3. Nicole Dufour: From the Service de chirurgie digestive, hépato-biliaire et endocrinienne, Pôle de Pathologies Digestives et Urologie (Zacharias); and the Pôle Anesthésie et Réanimation Chirurgicale, Hôpital Emile Muller, Mulhouse, France (Ahlschwede, Dufour, Romain, Theissen-Laval).
  4. Florence Romain: From the Service de chirurgie digestive, hépato-biliaire et endocrinienne, Pôle de Pathologies Digestives et Urologie (Zacharias); and the Pôle Anesthésie et Réanimation Chirurgicale, Hôpital Emile Muller, Mulhouse, France (Ahlschwede, Dufour, Romain, Theissen-Laval).
  5. Odile Theissen-Laval: From the Service de chirurgie digestive, hépato-biliaire et endocrinienne, Pôle de Pathologies Digestives et Urologie (Zacharias); and the Pôle Anesthésie et Réanimation Chirurgicale, Hôpital Emile Muller, Mulhouse, France (Ahlschwede, Dufour, Romain, Theissen-Laval).

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Liver resection may be associated with substantial blood loss, and cell saver use has been recommended for patients at high risk. We performed a study to compare the allogenic erythrocyte transfusion rate after liver resection between patients who had intraoperative cell salvage with a cell saver device versus patients who did not. Our hypothesis was that cell salvage with autologous transfusion would reduce the allogenic blood transfusion rate.
METHODS: Cell salvage was used selectively in patients at high risk for intraoperative blood loss based on preoperatively known predictors: right and repeat hepatectomy. Patients who underwent elective right or repeat hepatectomy between Nov. 9, 2007, and Jan. 27, 2016 were considered for the study. Data were retrieved from a liver resection database and were analyzed retrospectively. Patients with cell saver use (since January 2013) constituted the experimental group, and those without cell salvage (2007-2012), the control group. To reduce selection bias, we matched propensity scores. The primary outcome was the allogenic blood transfusion rate within 90 days postoperatively. Secondary outcomes were the number of transfused erythrocyte units, and rates of overall and infectious complications.
RESULTS: Ninety-six patients were included in the study, 41 in the cell saver group and 55 in the control group. Of the 96, 64 (67%) could be matched, 32 in either group. The 2 groups were balanced for demographic and clinical variables. The allogenic blood transfusion rate was 28% (95% confidence interval [CI] 12.5%-43.7%) in the cell saver group versus 72% (95% CI 56.3%-87.5%) in the control group ( < 0.001). The overall and infectious complication rates were not significantly different between the 2 groups.
CONCLUSION: Intraoperative cell salvage with autologous transfusion in elective right or repeat hepatectomy reduced the allogenic blood transfusion rate.

References

  1. Br J Anaesth. 2010 Oct;105(4):401-16 [PMID: 20802228]
  2. Can J Anaesth. 1991 Jul;38(5):604-7 [PMID: 1934211]
  3. HPB (Oxford). 2012 Dec;14(12):839-47 [PMID: 23134186]
  4. HPB (Oxford). 2009 Sep;11(6):510-5 [PMID: 19816616]
  5. Ann Fr Anesth Reanim. 2000 Dec;19(10):739-44 [PMID: 11200761]
  6. Ann Surg. 2009 Dec;250(6):914-21 [PMID: 19953711]
  7. Ann Surg. 2003 Jun;237(6):860-9; discussion 869-70 [PMID: 12796583]
  8. Anaesthesia. 2008 Dec;63(12):1332-8 [PMID: 19032302]
  9. HPB (Oxford). 2010 Feb;12(1):50-5 [PMID: 20495645]
  10. Ann Chir. 2005 Feb;130(2):108-24 [PMID: 15737324]
  11. Transfusion. 2012 Oct;52(10):2167-73 [PMID: 22321196]
  12. HPB (Oxford). 2015 Apr;17(4):357-61 [PMID: 25516363]
  13. Arch Surg. 1993 Sep;128(9):1065-9 [PMID: 8396388]
  14. Arch Surg. 1993 Feb;128(2):206-11 [PMID: 8381647]
  15. Transpl Int. 2005 Nov;18(11):1236-9 [PMID: 16221153]
  16. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2011 Mar;93(2):157-61 [PMID: 22041147]
  17. Ann Fr Anesth Reanim. 2011 Feb;30(2):168-90 [PMID: 21324634]
  18. Ann Surg. 2002 Oct;236(4):397-406; discussion 406-7 [PMID: 12368667]
  19. JAMA. 1975 Feb 3;231(5):490-1 [PMID: 1172829]
  20. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2012 Sep;286(3):717-21 [PMID: 22569711]
  21. Br J Surg. 2007 Jul;94(7):860-5 [PMID: 17380562]
  22. HPB (Oxford). 2016 May;18(5):428-35 [PMID: 27154806]
  23. Chest. 1992 Jun;101(6):1644-55 [PMID: 1303622]
  24. HPB (Oxford). 2013 Nov;15(11):908-15 [PMID: 23461811]
  25. Ann Surg. 2016 Aug;264(2):339-43 [PMID: 26501715]
  26. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg. 2005;12(5):351-5 [PMID: 16258801]
  27. Multivariate Behav Res. 2011 May;46(3):399-424 [PMID: 21818162]
  28. World J Gastroenterol. 2013 Mar 14;19(10 ):1625-31 [PMID: 23538988]
  29. Stat Med. 2009 Nov 10;28(25):3083-107 [PMID: 19757444]
  30. Surg Today. 2013 May;43(5):485-93 [PMID: 23085968]
  31. HPB (Oxford). 2012 Aug;14(8):506-13 [PMID: 22762398]
  32. HPB (Oxford). 2015 Oct;17 (10 ):863-71 [PMID: 26292655]
  33. Ann Surg. 2004 Aug;240(2):205-13 [PMID: 15273542]
  34. HPB (Oxford). 2014 May;16(5):459-68 [PMID: 24033514]
  35. Arch Surg. 2010 Nov;145(11):1075-81 [PMID: 21079096]
  36. HPB (Oxford). 2002;4(1):5-10 [PMID: 18333146]
  37. Br J Anaesth. 2013 May;110(5):690-701 [PMID: 23599512]
  38. Int J Epidemiol. 2009 Aug;38(4):1104-8 [PMID: 19336436]
  39. Dis Colon Rectum. 2015 Jan;58(1):74-82 [PMID: 25489697]
  40. Ann Surg Oncol. 2011 Jan;18(1):166-73 [PMID: 21222043]
  41. HPB (Oxford). 2012 Apr;14(4):236-41 [PMID: 22404261]
  42. Transplantation. 2008 Mar 27;85(6):863-9 [PMID: 18360269]
  43. Lancet. 2005 Apr 9-15;365(9467):1348-53 [PMID: 15823387]
  44. PLoS One. 2013 May 31;8(5):e64261 [PMID: 23741309]

MeSH Term

Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Blood Loss, Surgical
Blood Transfusion, Autologous
Case-Control Studies
Elective Surgical Procedures
Erythrocyte Transfusion
Female
Hepatectomy
Humans
Liver Diseases
Male
Middle Aged
Operative Blood Salvage
Outcome Assessment, Health Care
Propensity Score
Retrospective Studies

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0celltransfusiongroupbloodsalvagesaverpatientsallogenicraterightrepeatresectionstudyautologoushepatectomyelectivecontrollossusehighriskerythrocyteliverintraoperativeversusreducePatientsmatchedratesoverallinfectious2groups95%IntraoperativeBACKGROUND:LivermayassociatedsubstantialrecommendedperformedcomparedevicehypothesisMETHODS:Cellusedselectivelybasedpreoperativelyknownpredictors:underwentNov92007Jan272016consideredDataretrieveddatabaseanalyzedretrospectivelysinceJanuary2013constitutedexperimentalwithout2007-2012selectionbiaspropensityscoresprimaryoutcomewithin90dayspostoperativelySecondaryoutcomesnumbertransfusedunitscomplicationsRESULTS:Ninety-sixincluded4155966467%32eitherbalanceddemographicclinicalvariables28%confidenceinterval[CI]125%-437%72%CI563%-875%<0001complicationsignificantlydifferentCONCLUSION:reducedhepatectomy:propensity-score-matchedcase-controlanalysis

Similar Articles

Cited By