An Instrument to Measure Maturity of Integrated Care: A First Validation Study.

Liset Grooten, Liesbeth Borgermans, Hubertus Jm Vrijhoef
Author Information
  1. Liset Grooten: Department of Family Medicine and Chronic Care, Faculty of Medicine and Pharmacy, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, B-1090 Brussels, BE. ORCID
  2. Liesbeth Borgermans: Department of Family Medicine and Chronic Care, Faculty of Medicine and Pharmacy, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, B-1090 Brussels, BE. ORCID
  3. Hubertus Jm Vrijhoef: Department of Family Medicine and Chronic Care, Faculty of Medicine and Pharmacy, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, B-1090 Brussels, BE. ORCID

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Lessons captured from interviews with 12 European regions are represented in a new instrument, the B3-Maturity Model (B3-MM). B3-MM aims to assess maturity along 12 dimensions reflecting the various aspects that need to be managed in order to deliver integrated care. The objective of the study was to test the content validity of B3-MM as part of SCIROCCO (Scaling Integrated Care into Context), a European Union funded project.
METHODS: A literature review was conducted to compare B3-MM's 12 dimensions and their measurement scales with existing measures and instruments that focus on assessing the development of integrated care. Subsequently, a three-round survey conducted through a Delphi study with international experts in the field of integrated care was performed to test the relevance of: 1) the dimensions, 2) the maturity indicators and 3) the assessment scale used in B3-MM.
RESULTS: The 11 articles included in the literature review confirmed all the dimensions described in the original version of B3-MM. The Delphi study rounds resulted in various phrasing amendments of indicators and assessment scale. Full agreement among the experts on the relevance of the 12 B3-MM dimensions, their indicators, and assessment scale was reached after the third Delphi round.
CONCLUSION AND DISCUSSION: The B3-MM dimensions, maturity indicators and assessment scale showed satisfactory content validity. While the B3-MM is a unique instrument based on existing knowledge and experiences of regions in integrated care, further testing is needed to explore other measurement properties of B3-MM.

Keywords

References

  1. Milbank Q. 2016 Dec;94(4):862-917 [PMID: 27995711]
  2. BMC Health Serv Res. 2015 Mar 03;15:84 [PMID: 25884845]
  3. Trials. 2014 May 13;15:168 [PMID: 24885068]
  4. BMC Fam Pract. 2015 May 22;16:64 [PMID: 25998142]
  5. Int J Integr Care. 2012 Sep 18;12:e190 [PMID: 23593051]
  6. Qual Manag Health Care. 2002 Winter;10(2):1-11 [PMID: 11799825]
  7. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2010 Mar 18;10:22 [PMID: 20298572]
  8. Healthc Q. 2009;13 Spec No:6-15 [PMID: 20057243]
  9. Int J Integr Care. 2009 Apr 08;9:e10 [PMID: 19513179]
  10. PLoS One. 2012;7(7):e42256 [PMID: 22860100]
  11. J Adv Nurs. 2000 Oct;32(4):1008-15 [PMID: 11095242]
  12. F1000Res. 2016 Mar 16;5:361 [PMID: 27239275]
  13. Health Informatics J. 2016 Sep;22(3):758-67 [PMID: 26142431]
  14. Int J Integr Care. 2016 Oct 17;16(3):18 [PMID: 28435426]
  15. JAMA. 1988 Sep 23-30;260(12):1743-8 [PMID: 3045356]
  16. Eur J Cancer. 2016 Apr;57:68-77 [PMID: 26886181]
  17. Clin Chem. 2011 Mar;57(3):388-91 [PMID: 21357852]
  18. Milbank Q. 2005;83(4):691-729 [PMID: 16279964]
  19. J Interprof Care. 2015 May;29(3):245-52 [PMID: 25418319]
  20. Health Policy. 2016 Jan;120(1):129-38 [PMID: 26725643]
  21. BMC Health Serv Res. 2015 Apr 11;15:154 [PMID: 25889993]
  22. Health Policy Plan. 2014 Jan;29(1):42-55 [PMID: 23274439]
  23. Int J Integr Care. 2002;2:e12 [PMID: 16896389]
  24. J Adv Nurs. 2003 Feb;41(4):376-82 [PMID: 12581103]
  25. Implement Sci. 2015 Aug 12;10:113 [PMID: 26264351]
  26. Qual Life Res. 2010 May;19(4):539-49 [PMID: 20169472]
  27. Int J Integr Care. 2009;9:e03 [PMID: 19340327]
  28. Int J Integr Care. 2005;5:e01; discussion e03, e09 [PMID: 16773158]
  29. Qual Life Res. 2009 Oct;18(8):1115-23 [PMID: 19711195]
  30. Health Policy. 2014 May;116(1):71-83 [PMID: 24602373]
  31. BMJ. 2013 Oct 29;347:f6513 [PMID: 24168781]
  32. Med Care Res Rev. 2013 Apr;70(2):143-64 [PMID: 23161612]
  33. J Subst Abuse Treat. 2012 Dec;43(4):402-9 [PMID: 22999813]
  34. Int J Integr Care. 2009;9:e01 [PMID: 19340325]
  35. Int J Integr Care. 2004;4:e03 [PMID: 16773145]
  36. Int J Integr Care. 2013 Nov 28;13:e047 [PMID: 24363635]
  37. J Adv Nurs. 2006 Jan;53(2):205-12 [PMID: 16422719]
  38. Qual Life Res. 2012 May;21(4):651-7 [PMID: 21732199]
  39. Health Serv Res. 1998 Jun;33(2 Pt Ii):354-80 [PMID: 9618675]
  40. Emerg Med J. 2006 Sep;23(9):693-6 [PMID: 16921081]
  41. J Adv Nurs. 1994 Jan;19(1):180-6 [PMID: 8138622]
  42. J Clin Epidemiol. 2007 Jan;60(1):34-42 [PMID: 17161752]
  43. Int J Integr Care. 2007 Dec 20;7:e51 [PMID: 19503735]
  44. BMC Palliat Care. 2010 May 10;9:8 [PMID: 20459734]

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0B3-MMdimensionsintegratedcare12maturityindicatorsassessmentscaleinstrumentstudyvaliditymeasurementDelphiEuropeanregionsvarioustestcontentIntegratedliteraturereviewconductedexistingexpertsrelevanceINTRODUCTION:LessonscapturedinterviewsrepresentednewB3-MaturityModelaimsassessalongreflectingaspectsneedmanagedorderdeliverobjectivepartSCIROCCOScalingCareContextUnionfundedprojectMETHODS:compareB3-MM'sscalesmeasuresinstrumentsfocusassessingdevelopmentSubsequentlythree-roundsurveyinternationalfieldperformedof:123usedRESULTS:11articlesincludedconfirmeddescribedoriginalversionroundsresultedphrasingamendmentsFullagreementamongreachedthirdroundCONCLUSIONANDDISCUSSION:showedsatisfactoryuniquebasedknowledgeexperiencestestingneededexplorepropertiesInstrumentMeasureMaturityCare:FirstValidationStudy

Similar Articles

Cited By