Isolation, Identification, Prevalence, and Genetic Diversity of Group Bacteria From Different Foodstuffs in Tunisia.

Maroua Gdoura-Ben Amor, Mariam Siala, Mariem Zayani, Noël Grosset, Salma Smaoui, Feriele Messadi-Akrout, Florence Baron, Sophie Jan, Michel Gautier, Radhouane Gdoura
Author Information
  1. Maroua Gdoura-Ben Amor: Laboratory Research of Toxicology-Microbiology Environmental and Health, Sciences Faculty of Sfax, University of Sfax, Sfax, Tunisia.
  2. Mariam Siala: Laboratory Research of Toxicology-Microbiology Environmental and Health, Sciences Faculty of Sfax, University of Sfax, Sfax, Tunisia.
  3. Mariem Zayani: Laboratory Research of Toxicology-Microbiology Environmental and Health, Sciences Faculty of Sfax, University of Sfax, Sfax, Tunisia.
  4. Noël Grosset: Equipe Microbiologie, Agrocampus Ouest, Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique, UMR1253 Science et Technologie du Lait et de l'œuf, Rennes, France.
  5. Salma Smaoui: Regional Laboratory of Hygiene, Hedi Chaker University Hospital, Sfax, Tunisia.
  6. Feriele Messadi-Akrout: Regional Laboratory of Hygiene, Hedi Chaker University Hospital, Sfax, Tunisia.
  7. Florence Baron: Equipe Microbiologie, Agrocampus Ouest, Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique, UMR1253 Science et Technologie du Lait et de l'œuf, Rennes, France.
  8. Sophie Jan: Equipe Microbiologie, Agrocampus Ouest, Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique, UMR1253 Science et Technologie du Lait et de l'œuf, Rennes, France.
  9. Michel Gautier: Equipe Microbiologie, Agrocampus Ouest, Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique, UMR1253 Science et Technologie du Lait et de l'œuf, Rennes, France.
  10. Radhouane Gdoura: Laboratory Research of Toxicology-Microbiology Environmental and Health, Sciences Faculty of Sfax, University of Sfax, Sfax, Tunisia.

Abstract

group is widespread in nature and foods. Several members of this group are recognized as causing food spoilage and/or health issues. This study was designed to determine the prevalence and genetic diversity of the group strains isolated in Tunisia from different foods (cereals, spices, cooked food, fresh-cut vegetables, raw and cooked poultry meats, seafood, canned, pastry, and dairy products). In total, 687 different samples were collected and searched for the presence of the group after selective plating on MYP agar and enumeration of each sample. The typical pink-orange uniform colonies surrounded by a zone of precipitate were assumed to belong to the group. One typical colony from each sample was subcultured and preserved as cryoculture. Overall, 191 (27.8%) food samples were found positive, giving rise to a collection of 191 -like isolates. The concentration of -like bacteria were below 10 cfu/g or ml in 77.5% of the tested samples. Higher counts (>10 cfu/g or ml) were found in 6.8% of samples including fresh-cut vegetables, cooked foods, cereals, and pastry products. To verify whether -like isolates belonged to the group, a PCR test targeting the gene sequence specific of the group was carried out. Therefore, 174 isolates were found to be positive. Food samples were contaminated as follows: cereals (67.6%), pastry products (46.2%), cooked food (40.8%), cooked poultry meat (32.7%), seafood products (32.3%), spices (28.8%), canned products (16.7%), raw poultry meat (9.4%), fresh-cut vegetables (5.0%), and dairy products (4.8%). The 174 isolates were characterized by partial sequencing of the gene, using a Sym'Previous software tool to assign them to different phylogenetic groups. Strains were distributed as follows: 61.3, 29.5, 7.5, and 1.7% in the group III, IV, II, and V, respectively. The genetic diversity was further assessed by ERIC-PCR and PFGE typing methods. PFGE and ERIC-PCR patterns analysis allowed discriminating 143 and 99 different profiles, respectivey. These findings, associated to a relatively higher prevalence of group in different foods, could be a significant etiological agent of food in Tunisia.

Keywords

References

  1. FEMS Immunol Med Microbiol. 2005 Feb 1;43(2):301-10 [PMID: 15681162]
  2. Biotechniques. 1991 Apr;10(4):506-13 [PMID: 1867860]
  3. J Appl Bacteriol. 1991 Aug;71(2):130-3 [PMID: 1917722]
  4. Syst Appl Microbiol. 2013 Sep;36(6):383-91 [PMID: 23791203]
  5. Int J Food Microbiol. 2012 Jun 1;156(3):231-8 [PMID: 22541392]
  6. Int J Food Microbiol. 2009 Jan 15;128(3):460-6 [PMID: 19027973]
  7. Clin Microbiol Rev. 1993 Oct;6(4):324-38 [PMID: 8269390]
  8. Food Microbiol. 2014 Jun;40:64-74 [PMID: 24549199]
  9. ScientificWorldJournal. 2012;2012:736040 [PMID: 22593705]
  10. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2005 Nov;71(11):6613-23 [PMID: 16269689]
  11. J Clin Microbiol. 2006 Jul;44(7):2449-57 [PMID: 16825363]
  12. Int J Food Microbiol. 1995 Dec;28(2):145-55 [PMID: 8750663]
  13. FEMS Microbiol Lett. 2005 Sep 1;250(1):129-36 [PMID: 16043311]
  14. Environ Microbiol. 2008 Apr;10(4):851-65 [PMID: 18036180]
  15. Int J Food Microbiol. 2008 Nov 30;128(1):165-73 [PMID: 18805600]
  16. Emerg Infect Dis. 2017 Sep;23(9):1486-1492 [PMID: 28820137]
  17. Folia Microbiol (Praha). 2011 Nov;56(6):535-9 [PMID: 22083787]
  18. Foodborne Pathog Dis. 2014 Feb;11(2):145-9 [PMID: 24206436]
  19. PLoS One. 2017 Nov 15;12(11):e0187924 [PMID: 29140998]
  20. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2004 Feb;70(2):1068-80 [PMID: 14766590]
  21. Front Microbiol. 2013 Feb 22;4:32 [PMID: 23440299]
  22. FEMS Microbiol Rev. 2008 Jul;32(4):579-606 [PMID: 18422617]
  23. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2013 Jan;63(Pt 1):31-40 [PMID: 22328607]
  24. J Appl Microbiol. 2006;100(1):7-14 [PMID: 16405680]
  25. Nucleic Acids Res. 1991 Dec 25;19(24):6823-31 [PMID: 1762913]
  26. J Food Prot. 2008 Jun;71(6):1178-85 [PMID: 18592743]
  27. J Clin Microbiol. 2003 Feb;41(2):675-9 [PMID: 12574266]
  28. Soc Appl Bacteriol Symp Ser. 1994;23:61S-66S [PMID: 8047911]
  29. J Clin Microbiol. 2004 Jan;42(1):276-85 [PMID: 14715765]
  30. Foodborne Pathog Dis. 2010 Jul;7(7):867-70 [PMID: 20230270]
  31. J Food Prot. 1994 Oct;57(10):893-901 [PMID: 31121691]
  32. Int J Food Microbiol. 2011 Oct 17;150(1):34-41 [PMID: 21840614]
  33. J Proteome Res. 2016 Sep 2;15(9):3098-107 [PMID: 27432653]
  34. PLoS One. 2013 Dec 03;8(12):e81315 [PMID: 24312546]
  35. Meat Sci. 2002 Nov;62(3):381-90 [PMID: 22061614]
  36. J Clin Microbiol. 2011 Jan;49(1):263-8 [PMID: 21084517]
  37. J Clin Microbiol. 2010 Sep;48(9):3388-91 [PMID: 20660215]
  38. Indian J Med Res. 2009 Mar;129(3):316-20 [PMID: 19491426]
  39. J Food Sci Technol. 2015 May;52(5):2500-11 [PMID: 25892750]
  40. J Food Prot. 2006 Nov;69(11):2587-94 [PMID: 17133800]
  41. Int J Food Microbiol. 2013 Sep 2;166(2):270-9 [PMID: 23973839]
  42. Food Microbiol. 2011 Apr;28(2):261-5 [PMID: 21315982]

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0groupproductsfooddifferentcookedsamples8%foodsisolatesprevalenceTunisiacerealsfresh-cutvegetablespoultrypastryfound-like7%5ERIC-PCRPFGEgeneticdiversityspicesrawseafoodcanneddairysampletypical191positivecfu/gmlgene174follows:meat32phylogeneticgroupswidespreadnatureSeveralmembersrecognizedcausingspoilageand/orhealthissuesstudydesigneddeterminestrainsisolatedmeatstotal687collectedsearchedpresenceselectiveplatingMYPagarenumerationpink-orangeuniformcoloniessurroundedzoneprecipitateassumedbelongOnecolonysubculturedpreservedcryocultureOverall27givingrisecollectionconcentrationbacteria10775%testedHighercounts>106includingverifywhetherbelongedPCRtesttargetingsequencespecificcarriedThereforeFoodcontaminated676%462%403%281694%0%4characterizedpartialsequencingusingSym'PrevioussoftwaretoolassignStrainsdistributed6132971IIIIVIIVrespectivelyassessedtypingmethodspatternsanalysisalloweddiscriminating14399profilesrespectiveyfindingsassociatedrelativelyhighersignificantetiologicalagentIsolationIdentificationPrevalenceGeneticDiversityGroupBacteriaDifferentFoodstuffsBcereus

Similar Articles

Cited By