Antimicrobial Susceptibility among Colistin, Sulbactam, and Fosfomycin and a Synergism Study of Colistin in Combination with Sulbactam or Fosfomycin against Clinical Isolates of Carbapenem-Resistant .

Sombat Leelasupasri, Wichai Santimaleeworagun, Tossawan Jitwasinkul
Author Information
  1. Sombat Leelasupasri: Internal Medicine Unit, Phyathai II International Hospital, Bangkok, Thailand.
  2. Wichai Santimaleeworagun: Department of Pharmacy, Faculty of Pharmacy, Silpakorn University, Nakhon Pathom, Thailand. ORCID
  3. Tossawan Jitwasinkul: Antibiotic Optimization and Patient Care Project by Pharmaceutical Initiative for Resistant Bacteria and Infectious Diseases Working Group (PIRBIG), Silpakorn University, Nakhon Pathom, Thailand.

Abstract

This study aimed to determine the activity of colistin plus Sulbactam and colistin plus Fosfomycin against carbapenem-resistant (CRAB). Fifteen clinical isolates were obtained from patients admitted to Phyathai II International Hospital, Bangkok, Thailand, from August 2014 to April 2015. The antimicrobial susceptibilities of colistin, Sulbactam, and Fosfomycin were evaluated using the E-test or broth microdilution and the synergistic activity of the antibacterial combinations (colistin plus Sulbactam or Fosfomycin) was determined using the chequerboard method. Clonal relationships were explored using repetitive element palindromic- (REP-) PCR. The CRAB isolates were categorized by REP-PCR in 8 groups [A-H]. All CRAB isolates were universally susceptible to colistin but only 20.0% were susceptible to Sulbactam. The MIC ranges for colistin, Sulbactam, and Fosfomycin were 0.75-2 mg/L, 2-96 mg/L, and 64-256 mg/L, respectively. A chequerboard assay revealed that the rates of synergistic and additive effect rates of colistin plus Sulbactam and colistin plus Fosfomycin were 53.3% and 73.3% of isolates, respectively. No antagonistic effect in any colistin-based combination was observed. However, almost CRAB strains in clone A showed the synergy or additive effects of colistin-Sulbactam combination, whereas the other clone (B-H) mostly showed indifferent effects. In conclusion, colistin plus Sulbactam and colistin plus Fosfomycin against CRAB seem to be interesting option but the efficacy in clinical use has to be evaluated.

References

  1. Scand J Infect Dis. 2007;39(1):38-43 [PMID: 17366011]
  2. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2016 Nov 21;60(12 ):7236-7244 [PMID: 27671056]
  3. Mikrobiyol Bul. 2013 Jan;47(1):147-51 [PMID: 23390912]
  4. Southeast Asian J Trop Med Public Health. 2011 Jul;42(4):890-900 [PMID: 22299471]
  5. Sci Rep. 2015 Nov 24;5:17091 [PMID: 26597507]
  6. Jpn J Infect Dis. 2013;66(6):463-8 [PMID: 24270131]
  7. J Med Assoc Thai. 2014 Mar;97 Suppl 3:S1-6 [PMID: 24772574]
  8. Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2015 Jun;45(6):568-85 [PMID: 25857949]
  9. Pharmacotherapy. 2015 Oct;35(10):949-62 [PMID: 26497481]
  10. J Med Assoc Thai. 2011 Jul;94(7):863-70 [PMID: 21774295]
  11. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2004 May;53(5):848-52 [PMID: 15056646]
  12. PLoS One. 2016 Mar 21;11(3):e0151270 [PMID: 26998609]
  13. Southeast Asian J Trop Med Public Health. 2014 Jul;45(4):874-80 [PMID: 25427356]
  14. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2000 Dec;6(12):635-43 [PMID: 11284921]
  15. Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2015 Jan;45(1):8-18 [PMID: 25465524]
  16. J Med Assoc Thai. 2010 Feb;93(2):161-71 [PMID: 20301995]
  17. J Chemother. 2016 Jun;28(3):159-63 [PMID: 25978105]
  18. J Microbiol Methods. 2015 Dec;119:31-6 [PMID: 26415528]

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0colistinplussulbactamfosfomycinCRABisolatesusingactivityclinicalevaluatedsynergisticchequerboardsusceptiblerespectivelyratesadditiveeffect3%combinationcloneshowedeffectsColistinSulbactamFosfomycinstudyaimeddeterminecarbapenem-resistantFifteenobtainedpatientsadmittedPhyathaiIIInternationalHospitalBangkokThailandAugust2014April2015antimicrobialsusceptibilitiesE-testbrothmicrodilutionantibacterialcombinationsdeterminedmethodClonalrelationshipsexploredrepetitiveelementpalindromic-REP-PCRcategorizedREP-PCR8groups[A-H]universally200%MICranges075-2 mg/L2-96 mg/L64-256 mg/Lassayrevealed5373antagonisticcolistin-basedobservedHoweveralmoststrainssynergycolistin-sulbactamwhereasB-HmostlyindifferentconclusionseeminterestingoptionefficacyuseAntimicrobialSusceptibilityamongSynergismStudyCombinationClinicalIsolatesCarbapenem-Resistant

Similar Articles

Cited By (24)

A case report of intraventricular and intrathecal tigecycline infusions for an extensively drug-resistant intracranial Acinetobacter baumannii infection.In Vitro Activities of Colistin and Sitafloxacin Combinations against Multidrug-, Carbapenem-, and Colistin-Resistant Using the Broth Microdilution Checkerboard and Time-Kill Methods.Intravenous Colistin Monotherapy versus Combination Therapy against Carbapenem-Resistant Gram-Negative Bacteria Infections: Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.Prescription Pattern of Intravenous Fosfomycin in a Provincial Hospital in Thailand.Efficacy of Intravenous Colistin Monotherapy Versus Colistin Combined With Meropenem in Patients With Multidrug-Resistant Infections: A Retrospective Observational Study.Colistin plus Sulbactam or Fosfomycin against Carbapenem-Resistant : Improved Efficacy or Decreased Risk of Nephrotoxicity?Evaluation of the Bactericidal Activity of Fosfomycin in Combination with Selected Antimicrobial Comparison Agents Tested against Gram-Negative Bacterial Strains by Using Time-Kill Curves.Comparative Metabolomics Reveals Key Pathways Associated With the Synergistic Killing of Colistin and Sulbactam Combination Against Multidrug-Resistant .Antibiotic Treatment of Superinfection in Patients With SARS-CoV-2 Infection Admitted to Intensive Care Unit: An Observational Retrospective Study.Outcomes of Adjunctive Therapy with Intravenous Cefoperazone-Sulbactam for Ventilator-Associated Pneumonia Due to Carbapenem-Resistant .
See all "Cited by" articles