A novel method for determining sex in late term gestational mice based on the external genitalia.

Laura B Murdaugh, Haley N Mendoza-Romero, Eric W Fish, Scott E Parnell
Author Information
  1. Laura B Murdaugh: Bowles Center for Alcohol Studies, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States of America.
  2. Haley N Mendoza-Romero: Bowles Center for Alcohol Studies, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States of America.
  3. Eric W Fish: Bowles Center for Alcohol Studies, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States of America.
  4. Scott E Parnell: Bowles Center for Alcohol Studies, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States of America. ORCID

Abstract

In many experiments using fetal mice, it is necessary to determine the sex of the individual fetus. However, other than genotyping for sex-specific genes, there is no convenient, reliable method of sexing mice between gestational day (GD) 16.5 and GD 18.0. We designed a rapid, relatively simple visual method to determine the sex of mouse fetuses in the GD 16.5-GD 18.0 range that can be performed as part of a routine morphological assessment. By examining the genitalia for the presence or absence of key features, raters with minimal experience with the method were able to correctly identify the sex of embryos with 99% accuracy, while raters with no experience were 95% accurate. The critical genital features include: the presence or absence of urethral seam or proximal urethral meatus; the shape of the genitalia, and the presence or absence of an area related to the urethral plate. By comparing these morphological features of the external genitalia, we show a simple, accurate, and fast way to determine the sex of late stage mouse fetuses. Integrating this method into regular morphological assessments will facilitate the determination of sex differences in fetuses between GD 16.5 and GD 18.0.

References

  1. Mol Reprod Dev. 2001 Oct;60(2):225-6 [PMID: 11553922]
  2. Gene. 2012 Feb 15;494(1):36-43 [PMID: 22202639]
  3. Evol Dev. 2002 Mar-Apr;4(2):133-41 [PMID: 12004962]
  4. Biotech Histochem. 2015 May;90(4):309-14 [PMID: 25801294]
  5. Nature. 2014 May 15;509(7500):282-3 [PMID: 24834516]
  6. Neuroscience. 2017 Feb 7;342:4-20 [PMID: 26232714]
  7. Lab Anim. 1977 Jul;11(3):181-4 [PMID: 886831]
  8. Dev Growth Differ. 2015 Dec;57(9):639-47 [PMID: 26660623]
  9. Behav Brain Res. 2016 Sep 15;311:70-80 [PMID: 27185739]
  10. Comp Med. 2013 Apr;63(2):127-35 [PMID: 23582419]
  11. Lab Anim (NY). 2016 Sep 21;45(10 ):380-4 [PMID: 27654689]
  12. Singapore Med J. 2008 Jan;49(1):47-53 [PMID: 18204769]
  13. Lab Anim (NY). 2009 Jan;38(1):35-8 [PMID: 19112448]
  14. Development. 2015 May 15;142(10):1893-908 [PMID: 25968320]
  15. Teratology. 1985 Jun;31(3):425-7 [PMID: 4012649]

Grants

  1. P60 AA011605/NIAAA NIH HHS
  2. U01 AA021651/NIAAA NIH HHS
  3. P60-AA011605/NIH HHS
  4. U01-AA021651/NIH HHS

MeSH Term

Animals
Female
Genitalia
Genotype
Gestational Age
Male
Mice
Mice, Inbred C57BL
Photography
Pregnancy
SOX Transcription Factors
Sex Determination Analysis

Chemicals

SOX Transcription Factors

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0sexmethodGDgenitaliamicedetermine16180fetusesmorphologicalpresenceabsencefeaturesurethralgestational5simplemouseratersexperienceaccurateexternallatemanyexperimentsusingfetalnecessaryindividualfetusHowevergenotypingsex-specificgenesconvenientreliablesexingdaydesignedrapidrelativelyvisual5-GDrangecanperformedpartroutineassessmentexaminingkeyminimalablecorrectlyidentifyembryos99%accuracy95%criticalgenitalinclude:seamproximalmeatusshapearearelatedplatecomparingshowfastwaystageIntegratingregularassessmentswillfacilitatedeterminationdifferencesnoveldeterminingtermbased

Similar Articles

Cited By