Psychometric properties of the Patient Dignity Inventory in an acute psychiatric ward: an extension study of the preliminary validation.

Rosaria Di Lorenzo, Paola Ferri, Carlotta Biffarella, Giulio Cabri, Eleonora Carretti, Gabriella Pollutri, Ludovica Spattini, Cinzia Del Giovane, Harvey Max Chochinov
Author Information
  1. Rosaria Di Lorenzo: Psychiatric Intensive Treatment Facility, Mental Health Department, Azienda USL, Modena, Italy.
  2. Paola Ferri: Department of Diagnostic, Clinical and Public Health Medicine, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy.
  3. Carlotta Biffarella: Department of Diagnostic, Clinical and Public Health Medicine, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy.
  4. Giulio Cabri: Service of Psychiatric Diagnosis and Treatment, Mental Health Department, Azienda USL, Modena, Italy.
  5. Eleonora Carretti: School of Nursing, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Italy.
  6. Gabriella Pollutri: School of Specialization in Pscyhiatry, Faculty of Medicine, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Italy.
  7. Ludovica Spattini: School of Specialization in Pscyhiatry, Faculty of Medicine, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Italy.
  8. Cinzia Del Giovane: Faculty of Medicine, Institute of Primary Care (BIHAM), University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
  9. Harvey Max Chochinov: Department of Psychiatry, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB, Canada.

Abstract

Background: During the last decades, dignity has been an emerging issue in mental health since its ethical and therapeutic implications became known. This study is an extension of the preliminary validation of the Patient Dignity Inventory (PDI) in a psychiatric setting, originally designed for assessing perceived dignity in terminal cancer patients.
Methods: From October 21, 2015 to December 31, 2016, we administered the Italian PDI to all patients hospitalized in an acute psychiatric ward, who provided their consent and completed it at discharge (n=165). We performed Cronbach's alpha coefficient and principal factor analysis. We administered other scales concomitantly to analyze the concurrent validity of PDI. We applied stepwise multiple linear regression to identify the patients' demographic and clinical variables related to the PDI score.
Results: Our response rate was 93%, with excellent internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha coefficient=0.94). The factorial analysis showed three factors with eigenvalue >1, which explained >80% of total variance: 1) "loss of self-identity and anxiety for the future", 2) "concerns for social dignity and spiritual life", and 3) "loss of personal autonomy". The PDI and the three factor scores were positively and significantly correlated with the Hamilton Scales for Depression and Anxiety but not with other scale scores. Among patients' variables, "suicide risk" and "insufficient social and economic condition" were positively and significantly correlated with the PDI total score.
Conclusion: The PDI can be a reliable tool to assess patients' dignity perception in a psychiatric setting, which suggests that both social and clinical severe conditions are closely related to dignity loss.

Keywords

References

  1. Nurs Ethics. 2014 Mar;21(2):148-62 [PMID: 24046222]
  2. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2017 Sep;54(3):376-382 [PMID: 28711753]
  3. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2018 Feb;55(2):444-450 [PMID: 29128432]
  4. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2014 Jan;47(1):181-8 [PMID: 23830532]
  5. BMC Health Serv Res. 2007 Jul 02;7:99 [PMID: 17605786]
  6. JAMA. 2002 May 1;287(17):2253-60 [PMID: 11980525]
  7. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Jan 30;(1):CD000384 [PMID: 24477710]
  8. Indian J Med Res. 2015 Oct;142(4):355-8 [PMID: 26609024]
  9. Issues Ment Health Nurs. 2011;32(7):479-82 [PMID: 21736473]
  10. Eur Psychiatry. 2004 May;19(3):146-54 [PMID: 15158921]
  11. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2011 Jun 19;9:45 [PMID: 21682924]
  12. Ment Health Today. 2010 Feb;:38 [PMID: 20201153]
  13. Br J Med Psychol. 1959;32(1):50-5 [PMID: 13638508]
  14. J Psychosoc Nurs Ment Health Serv. 2018 Feb 1;56(2):20-28 [PMID: 28990641]
  15. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2015 Dec;50(6):874-81.e1 [PMID: 26342725]
  16. J Nerv Ment Dis. 2016 Sep;204(9):686-92 [PMID: 27227558]
  17. BMJ. 2001 Mar 17;322(7287):668-70 [PMID: 11250856]
  18. BMC Health Serv Res. 2015 Jan 28;15:41 [PMID: 25627836]
  19. J Psychiatr Res. 1975 Nov;12(3):189-98 [PMID: 1202204]
  20. J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs. 2012 Sep;19(7):569-76 [PMID: 22074230]
  21. Int J Ment Health Nurs. 2008 Aug;17(4):279-86 [PMID: 18666911]
  22. Epidemiol Psychiatr Sci. 2015 Feb;24(1):90-6 [PMID: 24330951]
  23. Int J Soc Psychiatry. 2010 Jan;56(1):60-73 [PMID: 20053723]
  24. Ann Fam Med. 2005 Jul-Aug;3(4):331-8 [PMID: 16046566]
  25. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2017 Feb;53(2):279-287 [PMID: 27810569]
  26. Ann Gen Psychiatry. 2011 Jan 20;10:2 [PMID: 21251305]
  27. Qual Health Res. 2009 Nov;19(11):1536-47 [PMID: 19797155]
  28. Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat. 2017 Jan 23;13:177-190 [PMID: 28182110]
  29. Int J Law Psychiatry. 2009 Nov-Dec;32(6):383-91 [PMID: 19796819]
  30. BMJ. 2007 Jul 28;335(7612):184-7 [PMID: 17656543]
  31. Tumori. 2012 Jul-Aug;98(4):491-500 [PMID: 23052167]
  32. PLoS One. 2016 Jan 25;11(1):e0147607 [PMID: 26808530]
  33. BMC Int Health Hum Rights. 2013 Mar 11;13:17 [PMID: 23497079]
  34. J Clin Nurs. 2006 Jan;15(1):93-102 [PMID: 16390528]
  35. Int Rev Psychiatry. 2017 Oct;29(5):377-388 [PMID: 28783462]
  36. BMC Med Ethics. 2014 Jun 27;15:50 [PMID: 24972627]
  37. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1960 Feb;23:56-62 [PMID: 14399272]
  38. BMC Int Health Hum Rights. 2009 Feb 24;9:3 [PMID: 19239684]
  39. Prim Care Companion CNS Disord. 2015 May 14;17(3):null [PMID: 26644947]
  40. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2008 Dec;36(6):559-71 [PMID: 18579340]
  41. Palliat Support Care. 2018 Feb;16(1):73-79 [PMID: 28635584]

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0dignityPDIpsychiatricsocialpatientsacutepatients'studyextensionpreliminaryvalidationPatientDignityInventorysettingadministeredhospitalizedwardCronbach'salphafactoranalysisclinicalvariablesrelatedscorethreetotal"lossscorespositivelysignificantlycorrelatedeconomicperceptionsevereBackground:lastdecadesemergingissuementalhealthsinceethicaltherapeuticimplicationsbecameknownoriginallydesignedassessingperceivedterminalcancerMethods:October212015December312016Italianprovidedconsentcompleteddischargen=165performedcoefficientprincipalscalesconcomitantlyanalyzeconcurrentvalidityappliedstepwisemultiplelinearregressionidentifydemographicResults:responserate93%excellentinternalconsistencycoefficient=094factorialshowedfactorseigenvalue>1explained>80%variance:1self-identityanxietyfuture"2"concernsspirituallife"3personalautonomy"HamiltonScalesDepressionAnxietyscaleAmong"suiciderisk""insufficientcondition"Conclusion:canreliabletoolassesssuggestsconditionscloselylossPsychometricpropertiesward:psychiatryinsufficientconditionpatientinventorydiseasessuiciderisk

Similar Articles

Cited By