Tactile stimulation disambiguates the perception of visual motion paths.

Hauke S Meyerhoff, Simon Merz, Christian Frings
Author Information
  1. Hauke S Meyerhoff: Leibniz-Institut für Wissensmedien, Schleichstr 6, 72076, Tübingen, Germany. h.meyerhoff@iwm-tuebingen.de.
  2. Simon Merz: Department of Psychology, University of Trier, Trier, Germany.
  3. Christian Frings: Department of Psychology, University of Trier, Trier, Germany.

Abstract

Although visual perception traditionally has been considered to be impenetrable by non-visual information, there are a rising number of reports discussing cross-modal influences on visual perception. In two experiments, we investigated how coinciding vibrotactile stimulation affects the perception of two discs that move toward each other, superimpose in the center of the screen, and then move apart. Whereas two discs streaming past each other was the dominant impression when the visual event was presented in isolation, a brief coinciding vibrotactile stimulation at the moment of overlap biased the visual impression toward two discs bouncing off each other (Experiment 1). Further, the vibrotactile stimulation actually changed perceptual processing by reducing the amount of perceived overlap between the discs (Experiment 2), which has been demonstrated to be associated with a higher proportion of bouncing impressions. We propose that tactile-induced quantitative changes in the visual percept might alter the quality of the visual percept (from streaming to bouncing), thereby adding to the understanding of how cross-modal information interacts with early visual perception and how this interaction influences subsequent visual impressions.

Keywords

References

  1. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2009 Feb;35(1):235-43 [PMID: 19170485]
  2. Percept Psychophys. 2008 Jul;70(5):765-71 [PMID: 18613625]
  3. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2011 Aug;37(4):1174-81 [PMID: 21553991]
  4. Perception. 2012;41(4):379-88 [PMID: 22896912]
  5. Psychol Sci. 2000 Sep;11(5):353-9 [PMID: 11228904]
  6. Percept Psychophys. 2003 Jan;65(1):123-32 [PMID: 12699315]
  7. Percept Psychophys. 1981 Dec;30(6):557-64 [PMID: 7335452]
  8. Perspect Psychol Sci. 2011 Jan;6(1):77-97 [PMID: 26162117]
  9. Perception. 2009;38(7):951-65 [PMID: 19764299]
  10. J Neurosci. 2002 Jul 1;22(13):5749-59 [PMID: 12097528]
  11. Seeing Perceiving. 2012;25(2):223-33 [PMID: 22370960]
  12. Atten Percept Psychophys. 2010 Feb;72(2):378-86 [PMID: 20139453]
  13. Cognition. 2006 Mar;99(2):131-65 [PMID: 16545625]
  14. J Neurosci Methods. 2007 May 15;162(1-2):8-13 [PMID: 17254636]
  15. Vision Res. 2007 Jun;47(14):1869-79 [PMID: 17499332]
  16. J Vis. 2012 Aug 07;12(8):5 [PMID: 22872777]
  17. Perception. 1998;27(9):1041-54 [PMID: 10341934]
  18. Nat Neurosci. 2009 Jun;12(6):718-24 [PMID: 19471271]
  19. Neurosci Lett. 2009 Jan 23;450(1):60-4 [PMID: 19013216]
  20. PLoS One. 2016 Apr 25;11(4):e0154147 [PMID: 27111759]
  21. Perception. 2004;33(4):455-69 [PMID: 15222393]
  22. Curr Opin Neurobiol. 2001 Aug;11(4):505-9 [PMID: 11502399]
  23. Exp Brain Res. 2009 Sep;198(2-3):245-59 [PMID: 19499212]
  24. Exp Brain Res. 2007 Jul;180(4):641-54 [PMID: 17333010]
  25. Science. 1964 Feb 7;143(3606):594-6 [PMID: 14080333]
  26. Neuroreport. 2005 Jul 13;16(10):1107-10 [PMID: 15973157]
  27. Cognition. 2018 Jan;170:88-94 [PMID: 28961431]
  28. Percept Psychophys. 2006 Jul;68(5):750-8 [PMID: 17076343]
  29. Nature. 1997 Jan 23;385(6614):308 [PMID: 9002513]
  30. Nature. 2000 Dec 14;408(6814):788 [PMID: 11130706]
  31. Psychol Sci. 2001 Mar;12(2):109-16 [PMID: 11340918]

MeSH Term

Adult
Female
Humans
Illusions
Male
Motion Perception
Physical Stimulation
Touch Perception
Young Adult

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0visualperceptiontwostimulationdiscsvibrotactilebouncinginformationcross-modalinfluencescoincidingmovetowardstreamingimpressionoverlapExperimentimpressionsperceptinteractionTactileAlthoughtraditionallyconsideredimpenetrablenon-visualrisingnumberreportsdiscussingexperimentsinvestigatedaffectssuperimposecenterscreenapartWhereaspastdominanteventpresentedisolationbriefmomentbiased1actuallychangedperceptualprocessingreducingamountperceived2demonstratedassociatedhigherproportionproposetactile-inducedquantitativechangesmightalterqualitytherebyaddingunderstandinginteractsearlysubsequentdisambiguatesmotionpathsBouncing/streamingillusionIllusorycrescenttransientsVisual-tactile

Similar Articles

Cited By