Research design: the methodology for interdisciplinary research framework.

Hilde Tobi, Jarl K Kampen
Author Information
  1. Hilde Tobi: 1Biometris, Wageningen University and Research, PO Box 16, 6700 AA Wageningen, The Netherlands. ORCID
  2. Jarl K Kampen: 1Biometris, Wageningen University and Research, PO Box 16, 6700 AA Wageningen, The Netherlands.

Abstract

Many of today's global scientific challenges require the joint involvement of researchers from different disciplinary backgrounds (social sciences, environmental sciences, climatology, medicine, etc.). Such interdisciplinary research teams face many challenges resulting from differences in training and scientific culture. Interdisciplinary education programs are required to train truly interdisciplinary scientists with respect to the critical factor skills and competences. For that purpose this paper presents the Methodology for Interdisciplinary Research (MIR) framework. The MIR framework was developed to help cross disciplinary borders, especially those between the natural sciences and the social sciences. The framework has been specifically constructed to facilitate the design of interdisciplinary scientific research, and can be applied in an educational program, as a reference for monitoring the phases of interdisciplinary research, and as a tool to design such research in a process approach. It is suitable for research projects of different sizes and levels of complexity, and it allows for a range of methods' combinations (case study, mixed methods, etc.). The different phases of designing interdisciplinary research in the MIR framework are described and illustrated by real-life applications in teaching and research. We further discuss the framework's utility in research design in landscape architecture, mixed methods research, and provide an outlook to the framework's potential in inclusive interdisciplinary research, and last but not least, research integrity.

Keywords

References

  1. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 1995 Jul;2(1):56-9 [PMID: 24234473]
  2. Clin Transl Sci. 2010 Oct;3(5):263-6 [PMID: 20973925]
  3. Health Serv Res. 2007 Feb;42(1 Pt 1):329-46 [PMID: 17355595]
  4. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2013 Sep 10;110(37):15031-6 [PMID: 23980165]
  5. Br J Health Psychol. 2015 Feb;20(1):5-20 [PMID: 25405549]
  6. Sci Eng Ethics. 2006 Jan;12(1):53-74 [PMID: 16501647]
  7. Psychol Sci. 2012 May 1;23(5):524-32 [PMID: 22508865]
  8. Psychol Sci. 2011 Nov;22(11):1359-66 [PMID: 22006061]
  9. PLoS One. 2009 May 29;4(5):e5738 [PMID: 19478950]
  10. Science. 2010 Feb 12;327(5967):812-8 [PMID: 20110467]
  11. PLoS One. 2010 Apr 07;5(4):e10068 [PMID: 20383332]

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0researchinterdisciplinaryframeworksciencesMIRdesignscientificdifferentResearchchallengesdisciplinarysocialetcInterdisciplinaryphasesmixedmethodsframework'sManytoday'sglobalrequirejointinvolvementresearchersbackgroundsenvironmentalclimatologymedicineteamsfacemanyresultingdifferencestrainingcultureeducationprogramsrequiredtraintrulyscientistsrespectcriticalfactorskillscompetencespurposepaperpresentsMethodologydevelopedhelpcrossbordersespeciallynaturalspecificallyconstructedfacilitatecanappliededucationalprogramreferencemonitoringtoolprocessapproachsuitableprojectssizeslevelscomplexityallowsrangemethods'combinationscasestudydesigningdescribedillustratedreal-lifeapplicationsteachingdiscussutilitylandscapearchitectureprovideoutlookpotentialinclusivelastleastintegritydesign:methodologyConsultancyEducationInterdisciplinarityMultidisciplinarycollaboration

Similar Articles

Cited By