Does the early social environment prepare individuals for the future? A match-mismatch experiment in female wild cavies.

Susanne Sangenstedt, Carsten Szardenings, Norbert Sachser, Sylvia Kaiser
Author Information
  1. Susanne Sangenstedt: 1Department of Behavioural Biology, University of Münster, Münster, Germany. ORCID
  2. Carsten Szardenings: 3Department of Psychology, University of Münster, Münster, Germany.
  3. Norbert Sachser: 1Department of Behavioural Biology, University of Münster, Münster, Germany.
  4. Sylvia Kaiser: 1Department of Behavioural Biology, University of Münster, Münster, Germany.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The social environment that mothers experience during pregnancy and lactation has a strong effect on the developing offspring. Whether offspring can be adaptively shaped to match an environment that is similar to the maternal one is still a major question in research. Our previous work in wild cavies showed that females whose mothers lived in a stable social environment with few social challenges during pregnancy and lactation (SE-daughters) developed different behavioral phenotypes than females whose mothers lived in an unstable social environment with frequent social challenges during pregnancy and lactation (UE-daughters). In the present study we investigated whether SE-daughters are better adapted to a stable social environment, similar to their maternal one, than are UE-daughters, for which the stable social environment represents a mismatch with their maternal one. For this purpose, we established pairs of one UE- and one SE-daughter and housed them together under stable social conditions for one week. Dominance ranks, behavioral profiles, glucocorticoid levels, cortisol responsiveness and body weight changes were compared between the groups. We hypothesized that SE-daughters fare better in a stable social setting compared to UE-daughters.
RESULTS: After one week of cohabitation in the stable social condition, UE-daughters had higher glucocorticoid levels, tended to gain less body weight within the first three days and displayed higher frequencies of energy-demanding behaviors such as and than SE-daughters. However, there was no difference in cortisol responsiveness as well as in dominance ranks between UE- and SE-daughters.
CONCLUSION: Higher glucocorticoid levels and less body weight gain imply that UE-daughters had higher energy demands than SE-daughters. This high energy demand of UE-daughters is further indicated by the increased display of and behavior. implies increased vigilance, which is far too energy demanding in a stable social condition but may confer an advantage in an unstable social environment. Hence, SE-daughters seem to better match a stable social environment, similar to their maternal one, than do UE-daughters, who encountered a mismatch to their maternal environment. This data supports the environmental matching hypothesis, stating that individuals manage the best in environments that correspond to their maternal ones.

Keywords

References

  1. Front Zool. 2014 Apr 09;11(1):30 [PMID: 24716471]
  2. Front Zool. 2015 Aug 24;12 Suppl 1:S4 [PMID: 26816522]
  3. Front Zool. 2015 Aug 24;12 Suppl 1:S3 [PMID: 26816521]
  4. Trends Endocrinol Metab. 2002 Nov;13(9):373-80 [PMID: 12367818]
  5. Front Zool. 2017 Jan 14;14 :2 [PMID: 28101122]
  6. J Physiol. 2014 Jun 1;592(11):2357-68 [PMID: 24882817]
  7. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2009 Jun;10(6):434-45 [PMID: 19401723]
  8. J Anim Ecol. 2015 Mar;84(2):326-36 [PMID: 25327547]
  9. Nature. 2006 Dec 21;444(7122):1065-8 [PMID: 17183322]
  10. J Neuroendocrinol. 2003 Aug;15(8):761-9 [PMID: 12834437]
  11. Physiol Behav. 2017 Nov 1;181:29-37 [PMID: 28859878]
  12. Neurobiol Dis. 2000 Oct;7(5):540-2 [PMID: 11042072]
  13. Psychoneuroendocrinology. 2001 Jul;26(5):503-19 [PMID: 11337134]
  14. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2013 Apr 08;368(1618):20120344 [PMID: 23569292]
  15. Behav Brain Res. 2003 Sep 15;144(1-2):199-210 [PMID: 12946610]
  16. Psychoneuroendocrinology. 2010 Jun;35(5):743-51 [PMID: 19945226]
  17. Physiol Behav. 2003 Aug;79(3):359-71 [PMID: 12954431]
  18. Proc Biol Sci. 2017 Feb 22;284(1849): [PMID: 28202817]
  19. Trends Ecol Evol. 1998 Oct 1;13(10):403-7 [PMID: 21238360]
  20. Physiol Behav. 2012 Jul 16;106(5):736-40 [PMID: 22353310]
  21. J Physiol. 2005 Aug 1;566(Pt 3):967-77 [PMID: 15932885]
  22. Dev Psychobiol. 2011 Sep;53(6):575-84 [PMID: 21761409]
  23. Horm Behav. 1999 Feb;35(1):28-37 [PMID: 10049600]
  24. Physiol Behav. 1996 Aug;60(2):589-94 [PMID: 8840923]
  25. Horm Behav. 2017 Apr;90:90-97 [PMID: 28263764]
  26. Physiol Behav. 1998 Feb 1;63(3):361-6 [PMID: 9469727]
  27. Proc Biol Sci. 2012 Dec 19;280(1753):20122368 [PMID: 23256192]
  28. Behav Brain Res. 2005 Mar 7;158(1):89-95 [PMID: 15680197]
  29. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2015 Mar 11;6:32 [PMID: 25814979]
  30. Trends Ecol Evol. 2000 Mar;15(3):86-87 [PMID: 10675920]
  31. Gen Comp Endocrinol. 2008 Jul;157(3):288-95 [PMID: 18602555]
  32. Psychoneuroendocrinology. 2011 Apr;36(3):352-71 [PMID: 20650569]
  33. J Comp Physiol B. 2001 Nov;171(8):651-9 [PMID: 11765974]
  34. Physiol Behav. 1986;38(1):31-9 [PMID: 2878450]
  35. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2005 Apr;29(2):283-94 [PMID: 15811499]
  36. Horm Behav. 2006 Mar;49(3):383-90 [PMID: 16242132]
  37. Curr Opin Neurobiol. 1999 Feb;9(1):128-34 [PMID: 10072372]
  38. Horm Behav. 2011 Mar;59(3):393-8 [PMID: 20633562]
  39. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2008 May 12;363(1497):1635-45 [PMID: 18048301]
  40. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2011 Apr;35(5):1291-301 [PMID: 21316391]
  41. Psychoneuroendocrinology. 1998 Nov;23(8):891-904 [PMID: 9924743]
  42. Nat Genet. 2003 Mar;33 Suppl:245-54 [PMID: 12610534]
  43. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2011 Jun;35(7):1518-33 [PMID: 20854842]
  44. Biol Psychiatry. 2016 Jan 15;79(2):87-96 [PMID: 25687413]
  45. Neural Plast. 2016;2016:6827135 [PMID: 27069693]
  46. Front Zool. 2015 Aug 24;12 Suppl 1:S6 [PMID: 26816523]
  47. Brain Res. 1992 Jul 17;586(1):135-9 [PMID: 1511342]
  48. Nature. 2004 Jul 22;430(6998):419-21 [PMID: 15269759]
  49. J Neuroendocrinol. 2008 Jun;20(6):795-801 [PMID: 18513204]

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0socialenvironmentonestableSE-daughtersUE-daughtersmaternalmotherspregnancylactationoffspringsimilarbetterglucocorticoidlevelsresponsivenessbodyweighthigherenergymatchwildcaviesfemaleswhoselivedchallengesbehavioralunstablemismatchUE-weekrankscortisolcomparedconditiongainlessincreaseddemandingmatchingindividualsBACKGROUND:experiencestrongeffectdevelopingWhethercanadaptivelyshapedstillmajorquestionresearchpreviousworkshoweddevelopeddifferentphenotypesfrequentpresentstudyinvestigatedwhetheradaptedrepresentspurposeestablishedpairsSE-daughterhousedtogetherconditionsDominanceprofileschangesgroupshypothesizedfaresettingRESULTS:cohabitationtendedwithinfirstthreedaysdisplayedfrequenciesenergy-demandingbehaviorsHoweverdifferencewelldominanceCONCLUSION:HigherimplydemandshighdemandindicateddisplaybehaviorimpliesvigilancefarmayconferadvantageHenceseemencountereddatasupportsenvironmentalhypothesisstatingmanagebestenvironmentscorrespondonesearlypreparefuture?match-mismatchexperimentfemaleAdaptationBehavioraldevelopmentCortisolEnergyEnvironmentalFemalePrenatalStressVigilanceWildcavy

Similar Articles

Cited By