Proteomics assisted profiling of antimicrobial peptide signatures from black pepper ( L.).

P Umadevi, M Soumya, Johnson K George, M Anandaraj
Author Information
  1. P Umadevi: 1Division of Crop Improvement and Biotechnology, ICAR-Indian Institute of Spices Research, Kozhikode, Kerala 673 012 India.
  2. M Soumya: 1Division of Crop Improvement and Biotechnology, ICAR-Indian Institute of Spices Research, Kozhikode, Kerala 673 012 India.
  3. Johnson K George: 1Division of Crop Improvement and Biotechnology, ICAR-Indian Institute of Spices Research, Kozhikode, Kerala 673 012 India.
  4. M Anandaraj: 2Division of Crop Protection, ICAR-Indian Institute of Spices Research, Kozhikode, Kerala 673 012 India.

Abstract

Plant antimicrobial peptides are the interesting source of studies in defense response as they are essential components of innate immunity which exert rapid defense response. In spite of abundant reports on the isolation of antimicrobial peptides (AMPs) from many sources, the profile of AMPs expressed/identified from single crop species under certain stress/physiological condition is still unknown. This work describes the AMP signature profile of black pepper and their expression upon infection using label-free quantitative proteomics strategy. The differential expression of 24 AMPs suggests that a combinatorial strategy is working in the defense network. The 24 AMP signatures belonged to the cationic, anionic, cysteine-rich and cysteine-free group. As the first report on the possible involvement of AMP signature in infection, our results offer a platform for further study on regulation, evolutionary importance and exploitation of theses AMPs as next generation molecules against pathogens.

Keywords

References

  1. Molecules. 2012 Mar 09;17(3):2980-91 [PMID: 22406902]
  2. Folia Microbiol (Praha). 2014 May;59(3):181-96 [PMID: 24092498]
  3. PLoS One. 2013 Sep 13;8(9):e73957 [PMID: 24058508]
  4. Curr Opin Plant Biol. 2009 Aug;12(4):414-20 [PMID: 19608450]
  5. FEBS Lett. 2002 Oct 23;530(1-3):181-5 [PMID: 12387889]
  6. Nucleic Acids Res. 2016 Jan 4;44(D1):D1087-93 [PMID: 26602694]
  7. BMC Plant Biol. 2015 Jan 21;15:18 [PMID: 25604123]
  8. Peptides. 2005 Nov;26(11):2064-73 [PMID: 16269343]
  9. Rapid Commun Mass Spectrom. 2001;15(18):1726-34 [PMID: 11555873]
  10. Front Immunol. 2012 Oct 25;3:325 [PMID: 23112800]
  11. BMC Bioinformatics. 2014 Aug 20;15:282 [PMID: 25141912]
  12. Nucleic Acids Res. 2016 Jan 4;44(D1):D1094-7 [PMID: 26467475]
  13. Peptides. 2012 Aug;36(2):322-30 [PMID: 22659413]
  14. Plant Mol Biol. 2000 Sep;44(2):187-97 [PMID: 11117262]
  15. Drugs Future. 2010 Mar;35(3):197 [PMID: 20495663]
  16. Nucleic Acids Res. 2009 Jan;37(Database issue):D963-8 [PMID: 18836196]
  17. FEMS Microbiol Lett. 2003 Nov 7;228(1):27-31 [PMID: 14612232]
  18. Biochem Res Int. 2011;2011:250349 [PMID: 21403856]
  19. Nat Biotechnol. 2007 Apr;25(4):465-72 [PMID: 17384586]
  20. BMC Genomics. 2015 Sep 02;16:653 [PMID: 26330304]
  21. FEBS Lett. 1990 Dec 10;276(1-2):172-4 [PMID: 1702393]
  22. Peptides. 2003 Nov;24(11):1681-91 [PMID: 15019199]
  23. J Biol Chem. 2001 Sep 21;276(38):35714-22 [PMID: 11473117]
  24. Biopolymers. 2012;98(4):322-31 [PMID: 23193596]
  25. J Biol Chem. 1992 Feb 5;267(4):2228-33 [PMID: 1733929]
  26. Plant Signal Behav. 2011 Sep;6(9):1325-32 [PMID: 21847025]
  27. PLoS One. 2011;6(9):e24677 [PMID: 21931807]
  28. Neuro Endocrinol Lett. 2003 Jun-Aug;24(3-4):227-32 [PMID: 14523362]
  29. Lancet. 1997 Feb 8;349(9049):418-22 [PMID: 9033483]

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0AMPsantimicrobialpeptidesdefenseAMPexpressionresponseprofilesignatureblackpepperinfectionstrategy24signaturesProteomicsPlantinterestingsourcestudiesessentialcomponentsof innateimmunityexertrapidspiteabundantreportsisolationmanysourcesexpressed/identifiedsinglecropspeciescertainstress/physiologicalconditionstillunknownworkdescribesuponusinglabel-freequantitativeproteomicsdifferentialsuggestscombinatorialworkingnetworkbelongedcationicanioniccysteine-richcysteine-freegroupfirstreportpossibleinvolvementresultsofferplatformstudyregulationevolutionaryimportanceexploitationthesesnextgenerationmoleculespathogensassistedprofilingpeptideLAntimicrobialDifferentialHost–pathogeninteraction

Similar Articles

Cited By