Not only priming: Soil microbiota may protect tomato from root pathogens.

Matteo Chialva, Yang Zhou, Davide Spadaro, Paola Bonfante
Author Information
  1. Matteo Chialva: a Department of Life Sciences and Systems Biology , University of Torino , Viale P.A. Mattioli 25, I-10125 Torino, Italy.
  2. Yang Zhou: a Department of Life Sciences and Systems Biology , University of Torino , Viale P.A. Mattioli 25, I-10125 Torino, Italy.
  3. Davide Spadaro: c Department of Agricultural , Forestry and Food Sciences (DISAFA) and AGROINNOVA, Centre of Competence for the Innovation in the Agroenvironmental Sector, University of Torino, Largo Braccini 2, I-10095 Grugliasco , Italy .
  4. Paola Bonfante: a Department of Life Sciences and Systems Biology , University of Torino , Viale P.A. Mattioli 25, I-10125 Torino, Italy.

Abstract

An increasing number of studies have investigated soil microbial biodiversity. However, the mechanisms regulating plant responses to soil microbiota are largely unknown. A previous work tested the hypothesis that tomato plants grown on native soils with their complex microbiotas respond differently from tomato growing in a sterile substrate. Two soils, suppressive or conducive to Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. lycopersici (FOL), and two genotypes susceptible and resistant to the same pathogen were considered. The work highlighted that the two tested soil microbiotas, irrespectively of their taxonomic composition, elicit the PAMP-triggered Immunity Pathway, the first level of plant defence, as well as an increased lignin synthesis, leading to an active protection when FOL is present in the soil. Here, we tested the expression of a panel of genes involved in Effector-Triggered Immunity (ETI), demonstrating that soil microbiota, beside genotype, affects plant resistance to FOL also modulating this pathway.

Keywords

References

  1. Nature. 2012 Aug 2;488(7409):86-90 [PMID: 22859206]
  2. Trends Plant Sci. 2016 Oct;21(10):818-822 [PMID: 27507609]
  3. Plant Signal Behav. 2009 Dec;4(12):1107-10 [PMID: 20514222]
  4. New Phytol. 2016 Jan;209(2):798-811 [PMID: 26467257]
  5. PLoS Biol. 2015 Aug 18;13(8):e1002226 [PMID: 26284777]
  6. mSystems. 2016 Mar 29;1(2): [PMID: 27822520]
  7. Environ Microbiol. 2018 Jan;20(1):124-140 [PMID: 29266641]
  8. Cell. 2003 Feb 7;112(3):379-89 [PMID: 12581527]
  9. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2007 May;5(5):355-62 [PMID: 17384666]
  10. Genome Biol. 2014;15(10):492 [PMID: 25323444]
  11. Nature. 2015 Dec 17;528(7582):364-9 [PMID: 26633631]
  12. Nature. 2018 Mar 8;555(7695):210-215 [PMID: 29489753]
  13. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2016 Dec 6;113(49):E7996-E8005 [PMID: 27864511]
  14. Fungal Biol. 2016 Jun-Jul;120(6-7):862-72 [PMID: 27268246]
  15. Plant Cell. 1998 Jun;10(6):1055-68 [PMID: 9634592]
  16. Nature. 2012 Aug 2;488(7409):91-5 [PMID: 22859207]
  17. New Phytol. 2018 Feb 9;:null [PMID: 29424928]

MeSH Term

Fusarium
Solanum lycopersicum
Plant Diseases
Soil Microbiology

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0soilmicrobiotatomatoplanttestedsoilsFOLresponsesworkmicrobiotassuppressiveconduciveFusariumoxysporumfsplycopersicitwogenotypessusceptibleresistantImmunitydefenceligninexpressionincreasingnumberstudiesinvestigatedmicrobialbiodiversityHowevermechanismsregulatinglargelyunknownprevioushypothesisplantsgrownnativecomplexresponddifferentlygrowingsterilesubstrateTwopathogenconsideredhighlightedirrespectivelytaxonomiccompositionelicitPAMP-triggeredPathwayfirstlevelwellincreasedsynthesisleadingactiveprotectionpresentpanelgenesinvolvedEffector-TriggeredETIdemonstratingbesidegenotypeaffectsresistancealsomodulatingpathwaypriming:Soilmayprotectrootpathogensarbuscularmycorrhizalfungigenebiosynthesis

Similar Articles

Cited By