Evaluation of tacrolimus-related CYP3A5 genotyping in China: Results from the First External Quality Assessment Exercise.

Guigao Lin, Xiao Zhang, Kuo Zhang, Yanxi Han, Liming Tan, Jinming Li
Author Information
  1. Guigao Lin: National Center for Clinical Laboratories, Beijing Hospital, National Center of Gerontology, Beijing, China. ORCID
  2. Xiao Zhang: Department of Laboratory, The People's Hospital of Hunan Province, First Affiliated Hospital of Hunan Normal University, Changsha, China.
  3. Kuo Zhang: National Center for Clinical Laboratories, Beijing Hospital, National Center of Gerontology, Beijing, China.
  4. Yanxi Han: National Center for Clinical Laboratories, Beijing Hospital, National Center of Gerontology, Beijing, China.
  5. Liming Tan: Department of Laboratory, The People's Hospital of Hunan Province, First Affiliated Hospital of Hunan Normal University, Changsha, China.
  6. Jinming Li: National Center for Clinical Laboratories, Beijing Hospital, National Center of Gerontology, Beijing, China.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: tacrolimus is the most widely used immunosuppressant in solid organ transplant patients. The cytochrome P450 3A5 (CYP3A5) has been proved to be associated with tacrolimus dose requirement. Molecular detection for CYP3A5 genotyping is demanded for the optimization of treatments of tacrolimus.
METHODS: To achieve the consistency and accuracy of the testing results, the Chinese National Center for Clinical Laboratories (NCCL) organized a national external quality assessment(EQA) program to evaluate the performance of laboratories providing CYP3A5 genotyping. Ten validated DNA samples covering the common genetic polymorphisms of CYP3A5 were delivered to 33 voluntary laboratories, and their detecting results and clinical written reports were evaluated.
RESULTS: Thirty-three datasets were received. The corresponding analytical sensitivity was 95.9% (285/297 challenges; 95% confidence interval: 93.0%-97.9%), and the analytical specificity was 95.3% (346/363; 95% confidence interval: 92.6%-97.2%). Thirty of the participating laboratories correctly identified the CYP3A5 allele status for all EQA samples. Three laboratories made genotyping errors, and 2 of them failed to detect any of the homozygotes such as *1/*1 and *3/*3. Twenty-eight CYP3A5*3 tests reports were submitted, but many reports showed a shortage of essential information. No reports fulfilled all the consensus recommendations for pharmacogenetic test result reporting.
CONCLUSION: The EQA program highlighted the necessity for an improvement in the accuracy of genotyping for some of the laboratories and a greater education on the reporting of CYP3A5 genotyping results.

Keywords

References

  1. Clin Pharmacokinet. 2010 Mar;49(3):141-75 [PMID: 20170205]
  2. Ther Drug Monit. 2005 Feb;27(1):10-7 [PMID: 15665740]
  3. Genet Med. 2017 Feb;19(2):215-223 [PMID: 27441996]
  4. Expert Opin Drug Metab Toxicol. 2016 May;12(5):555-65 [PMID: 27010623]
  5. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2013 Aug;94(2):201-2 [PMID: 23588314]
  6. Pharmacogenet Genomics. 2016 Apr;26(4):161-168 [PMID: 26736087]
  7. Clin Chem. 2004 Mar;50(3):632-7 [PMID: 14981029]
  8. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2015 Jul;98(1):19-24 [PMID: 25801146]
  9. Nat Genet. 2001 Apr;27(4):383-91 [PMID: 11279519]
  10. Pharmacogenetics. 2004 Mar;14(3):147-54 [PMID: 15167702]
  11. J Mol Diagn. 2014 May;16(3):371-7 [PMID: 24631467]
  12. Transplantation. 1996 Oct 15;62(7):920-6 [PMID: 8878385]
  13. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2007 Jun;131(6):852-63 [PMID: 17550311]
  14. Virchows Arch. 2013 Jan;462(1):27-37 [PMID: 23250354]
  15. Pharmacogenetics. 2001 Dec;11(9):773-9 [PMID: 11740341]
  16. Mol Biol Rep. 2010 Apr;37(4):1883-90 [PMID: 19609718]
  17. J Clin Lab Anal. 2018 Oct;32(8):e22563 [PMID: 29708622]
  18. J Cardiovasc Pharmacol. 2015 Aug;66(2):129-34 [PMID: 25815675]
  19. Drug Metab Rev. 2016;48(1):88-112 [PMID: 26912097]
  20. Nature. 2015 Oct 15;526(7573):343-50 [PMID: 26469045]
  21. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2016 Feb;99(2):172-85 [PMID: 26479518]
  22. Clin Chem. 2002 Oct;48(10):1668-71 [PMID: 12324482]
  23. Expert Opin Drug Metab Toxicol. 2015 Jun;11(6):921-36 [PMID: 25865963]
  24. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2010 Jun;87(6):640-1 [PMID: 20485320]
  25. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2010 Jun;87(6):721-6 [PMID: 20393454]
  26. J Mol Diagn. 2016 Jan;18(1):109-23 [PMID: 26621101]

MeSH Term

China
Cytochrome P-450 CYP3A
Genotype
Genotyping Techniques
Graft Rejection
Humans
Immunosuppressive Agents
Laboratory Proficiency Testing
Organ Transplantation
Tacrolimus

Chemicals

Immunosuppressive Agents
CYP3A5 protein, human
Cytochrome P-450 CYP3A
Tacrolimus

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0CYP3A5genotypinglaboratoriesreportsresultsEQAreportingtacrolimusaccuracyexternalqualityassessmentprogramsamplesanalytical959%95%confidenceinterval:testresultBACKGROUND:TacrolimuswidelyusedimmunosuppressantsolidorgantransplantpatientscytochromeP4503A5provedassociateddoserequirementMoleculardetectiondemandedoptimizationtreatmentsMETHODS:achieveconsistencytestingChineseNationalCenterClinicalLaboratoriesNCCLorganizednationalevaluateperformanceprovidingTenvalidatedDNAcoveringcommongeneticpolymorphismsdelivered33voluntarydetectingclinicalwrittenevaluatedRESULTS:Thirty-threedatasetsreceivedcorrespondingsensitivity285/297challenges930%-97specificity3%346/363926%-972%ThirtyparticipatingcorrectlyidentifiedallelestatusThreemadeerrors2faileddetecthomozygotes*1/*1*3/*3Twenty-eightCYP3A5*3testssubmittedmanyshowedshortageessentialinformationfulfilledconsensusrecommendationspharmacogeneticCONCLUSION:highlightednecessityimprovementgreatereducationEvaluationtacrolimus-relatedChina:ResultsFirstExternalQualityAssessmentExercise

Similar Articles

Cited By (1)