Pessary use in stress urinary incontinence: a review of advantages, complications, patient satisfaction, and quality of life.

Ghadeer Al-Shaikh, Sadiqa Syed, Somaia Osman, Abdulrahman Bogis, Ahmed Al-Badr
Author Information
  1. Ghadeer Al-Shaikh: Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, College of Medicine, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
  2. Sadiqa Syed: Department of Basic Sciences, College of Medicine, Princess Nourah bint Abdulrahman University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
  3. Somaia Osman: Department of Urogynecology & Pelvic Reconstructive Surgery, Women's Specialized Hospital, King Fahad Medical City, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
  4. Abdulrahman Bogis: Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, College of Medicine, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
  5. Ahmed Al-Badr: Department of Urogynecology & Pelvic Reconstructive Surgery, Women's Specialized Hospital, King Fahad Medical City, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.

Abstract

Stress urinary incontinnce (SUI) is a common condition among women. The usual approach to treatment of SUI is a stepwise plan from conservative to surgical procedures. A vaginal pessary is one of the commonly used conservative treatments that offer symptomatic improvement for women with incontinence. This review provides a critical analysis of the benefits and shortcomings offered by vaginal pessaries to patients affected by SUI, with a particular focus on indications, advantages, quality of life, patient satisfaction, and potential complications. To obtain the required information, an extensive search of PubMed and Cochrane databases was performed, covering the time frame from January 2000 to December 2016. We also surveyed the published guidelines of American Urological Association, Canadian Urological Association, American Urogynecological Society, National Institutes of Health (USA), and National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (UK). A total of 192 original research papers, review articles, and clinical trials were identified. The analysis of retrieved data provides evidence that vaginal pessaries constitute an effective nonsurgical option for SUI. The satisfaction rate with pessary use is high and only minor complications, if any, occur, vaginal discharge being the most common. The reviewed studies document that vaginal pessaries provide an adequate control of SUI if they are fit properly and managed by frequent replacements and regular checkups. They should be considered among the first line of treatment for SUI associated with exercise and increased intra-abdominal pressure.

Keywords

References

  1. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 2002;13(2):88-95; discussion 95 [PMID: 12054188]
  2. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2008 May;198(5):563.e1-6 [PMID: 18355780]
  3. BJU Int. 2008 Jun;101(11):1388-95 [PMID: 18454794]
  4. BMJ. 2014 Sep 15;349:g4531 [PMID: 25225003]
  5. Clin Geriatr Med. 2004 Aug;20(3):499-509, vii [PMID: 15341811]
  6. J Midwifery Womens Health. 2006 Mar-Apr;51(2):78-84 [PMID: 16504903]
  7. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 2004 Sep-Oct;15(5):302-7 [PMID: 15300365]
  8. N Engl J Med. 2009 Jan 29;360(5):481-90 [PMID: 19179316]
  9. Neurourol Urodyn. 2002;21(2):167-78 [PMID: 11857671]
  10. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2004 Apr;190(4):1025-9 [PMID: 15118635]
  11. Int Urogynecol J. 2010 Jan;21(1):5-26 [PMID: 19937315]
  12. Clin Obstet Gynecol. 2007 Sep;50(3):709-19 [PMID: 17762419]
  13. Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg. 2015 May-Jun;21(3):150-3 [PMID: 25679355]
  14. J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2013 Jul;35(7):664-674 [PMID: 23876646]
  15. Can Fam Physician. 2010 Nov;56(11):1115-20 [PMID: 21075990]
  16. BJOG. 2009 Dec;116(13):1715-21 [PMID: 19906018]
  17. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2007 May;196(5):474.e1-8 [PMID: 17466709]
  18. Obstet Gynecol. 2003 Apr;101(4):671-6 [PMID: 12681869]
  19. Obstet Gynecol. 2006 Jul;108(1):93-9 [PMID: 16816061]
  20. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 2008 Jun;19(6):773-82 [PMID: 18204797]
  21. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2006 Sep;54(9):1325-33 [PMID: 16970638]
  22. Int Urogynecol J. 2017 May;28(5):735-744 [PMID: 27752749]
  23. Baillieres Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2000 Apr;14(2):183-205 [PMID: 10897319]
  24. Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am. 2009 Sep;36(3):541-63 [PMID: 19932415]
  25. J Am Geriatr Soc. 1998 Jul;46(7):870-4 [PMID: 9670874]
  26. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 2006 Feb;17(2):170-5 [PMID: 15830115]
  27. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2005 Mar;192(3):795-806 [PMID: 15746674]
  28. Rev Obstet Gynecol. 2010 Winter;3(1):3-9 [PMID: 20508777]
  29. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2003 Sep;82(3):327-38 [PMID: 14499979]
  30. CMAJ. 2017 Feb 6;189(5):E194-E203 [PMID: 28246265]
  31. J Reprod Med. 1995 Feb;40(2):89-94 [PMID: 7738934]
  32. Int Urogynecol J. 2016 May;27(5):811-6 [PMID: 26642799]
  33. J Urol. 2007 Feb;177(2):680-4 [PMID: 17222656]
  34. Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg. 2012 Mar-Apr;18(2):118-21 [PMID: 22453323]
  35. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 2009 Sep;20(9):1023-8 [PMID: 19533009]
  36. Urol Nurs. 2015 Jul-Aug;35(4):179-86, 203 [PMID: 26402992]
  37. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010 Jan 20;(1):CD005654 [PMID: 20091581]
  38. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2008 May;198(5):592.e1-5 [PMID: 18455542]
  39. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2004 Jul;191(1):198-200 [PMID: 15295365]
  40. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 2006 Feb;17(2):155-9 [PMID: 16044204]
  41. Obstet Gynecol Surv. 2000 Jul;55(7):455-60 [PMID: 10885651]
  42. Int Urogynecol J. 2015 Sep;26(9):1305-12 [PMID: 25862241]
  43. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 2002;13(5):326-9 [PMID: 12355294]
  44. Lancet. 2006 Jan 7;367(9504):57-67 [PMID: 16399154]
  45. Br J Community Nurs. 2010 Nov;15(11):526, 528, 530-2 [PMID: 21079556]
  46. Obstet Gynecol. 2004 Sep;104(3):607-20 [PMID: 15339776]
  47. Urology. 2003 Oct;62(4 Suppl 1):16-23 [PMID: 14550833]
  48. Am J Med. 2007 Mar;120(3):211-20 [PMID: 17349439]
  49. Urology. 2016 Jan;87:70-5 [PMID: 26375847]
  50. Can Urol Assoc J. 2012 Oct;6(5):354-63 [PMID: 23093627]
  51. Ann Intern Med. 2008 Mar 18;148(6):459-73 [PMID: 18268288]
  52. J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2004 Feb;26(2):113-7 [PMID: 14965476]
  53. Am Fam Physician. 2013 May 1;87(9):634-40 [PMID: 23668526]
  54. Am Fam Physician. 2000 May 1;61(9):2719-26, 2729 [PMID: 10821152]
  55. Minerva Urol Nefrol. 2006 Dec;58(4):311-9 [PMID: 17268396]
  56. Obstet Gynecol. 2010 Mar;115(3):609-17 [PMID: 20177294]
  57. Obstet Gynecol. 2012 Jul;120(1):91-7 [PMID: 22914396]
  58. Care Manag J. 2006 Winter;7(4):213-7 [PMID: 17194058]
  59. P T. 2012 Jun;37(6):345-361H [PMID: 22876096]
  60. Phys Ther. 2013 Jun;93(6):757-73 [PMID: 23431210]
  61. Ther Adv Urol. 2013 Aug;5(4):189-200 [PMID: 23904858]
  62. J Sex Med. 2009 Jan;6(1):40-8 [PMID: 19170835]
  63. Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg. 2011;17(1):30-35 [PMID: 21572534]
  64. Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 2016;160:D674 [PMID: 27484432]
  65. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2017 May 30;14 (6): [PMID: 28556806]

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0SUIvaginalurinarypessaryreviewpessariessatisfactioncomplicationscommonamongwomentreatmentconservativeincontinenceprovidesanalysisadvantagesqualitylifepatientAmericanUrologicalAssociationNationalHealthnonsurgicaluseStressincontinnceconditionusualapproachstepwiseplansurgicalproceduresonecommonlyusedtreatmentsoffersymptomaticimprovementcriticalbenefitsshortcomingsofferedpatientsaffectedparticularfocusindicationspotentialobtainrequiredinformationextensivesearchPubMedCochranedatabasesperformedcoveringtimeframeJanuary2000December2016alsosurveyedpublishedguidelinesCanadianUrogynecologicalSocietyInstitutesUSAInstituteCareExcellenceUKtotal192originalresearchpapersarticlesclinicaltrialsidentifiedretrieveddataevidenceconstituteeffectiveoptionratehighminoroccurdischargereviewedstudiesdocumentprovideadequatecontrolfitproperlymanagedfrequentreplacementsregularcheckupsconsideredfirstlineassociatedexerciseincreasedintra-abdominalpressurePessarystressincontinence:interventionprolapse

Similar Articles

Cited By (18)