Integrity in Biomedical Research: A Systematic Review of Studies in China.

Nannan Yi, Benoit Nemery, Kris Dierickx
Author Information
  1. Nannan Yi: Centre for Biomedical Ethics and Law, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, KU Leuven - University of Leuven, Kapucijnenvoer 35, Blok D, Box 7001, 3000, Leuven, Belgium. ORCID
  2. Benoit Nemery: Centre for Environment and Health, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, KU Leuven - University of Leuven, O&N 1, Herestraat 49, Box 706, 3000, Leuven, Belgium. ORCID
  3. Kris Dierickx: Centre for Biomedical Ethics and Law, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, KU Leuven - University of Leuven, Kapucijnenvoer 35, Blok D, Box 7001, 3000, Leuven, Belgium. kris.dierickx@kuleuven.be. ORCID

Abstract

Recent empirical evidence has demonstrated that research misconduct occurs to a substantial degree in biomedical research. It has been suggested that scientific integrity is also of concern in China, but this seems to be based largely on anecdotal evidence. We, therefore, sought to explore the Chinese situation, by making a systematic review of published empirical studies on biomedical research integrity in China. One of our purposes was also to summarize the existing body of research published in Chinese. We searched the China National Knowledge Infrastructure, Wanfang Data, PubMed and Web of Science for potentially relevant studies, and included studies meeting our inclusion criteria, i.e. mainly those presenting empirically obtained data about the practice of research in China. All the data was extracted and synthesized using an inductive approach. Twenty-one studies were included for review. Two studies used qualitative methods (interviews) and nineteen studies used quantitative methods (questionnaires). Studies involved mainly medical postgraduates and nurses and they investigated awareness, attitudes, perceptions and experiences of research integrity and misconduct. Most of the participants in these 21 studies reported that research integrity is of great importance and that they obey academic norms during their research. Nevertheless, the occurrence of research misbehaviors, such as fabrication, falsification, plagiarism, improper authorship and duplicate submission was also reported. Strengthening research integrity training, developing the governance system and improving the scientific evaluation system were areas of particular attention in several studies. Our review demonstrates that a substantial number of articles have been devoted to research integrity in China, but only a few studies provide empirical evidence. With more safeguard measures of research integrity being taken in China, it would be crucial to conduct more research to explore researchers' in-depth perceptions and evaluate the changes.

Keywords

References

  1. Nature. 2010 Feb 18;463(7283):877 [PMID: 20164904]
  2. BMC Med Ethics. 2014 Mar 25;15:25 [PMID: 24666413]
  3. Nature. 2014 Nov 27;515(7528):492 [PMID: 25428487]
  4. Account Res. 2016;23(4):254-5 [PMID: 26649475]
  5. Sci Eng Ethics. 2012 Jun;18(2):223-39 [PMID: 22207497]
  6. Nature. 2015 Apr 30;520(7549):S10-2 [PMID: 25924192]
  7. Nature. 2015 Apr 30;520(7549):S18-20 [PMID: 25924194]
  8. CMAJ. 2010 Mar 23;182(5):424-5 [PMID: 20176754]
  9. Am J Bioeth. 2002 Fall;2(4):51-3 [PMID: 12762926]
  10. Sci Eng Ethics. 2007 Dec;13(4):387-94 [PMID: 18044009]
  11. J Microbiol Biol Educ. 2014 Dec 15;15(2):162-4 [PMID: 25574270]
  12. Account Res. 2009;16(5):268-83 [PMID: 19757232]
  13. Lancet. 2010 Feb 27;375(9716):711 [PMID: 20201132]
  14. Science. 2013 Nov 29;342(6162):1019 [PMID: 24288301]
  15. Perspect Psychol Sci. 2015 May;10(3):361-79 [PMID: 25987515]
  16. Sci Eng Ethics. 2016 Aug;22(4):1245-1249 [PMID: 26197864]
  17. Sci Eng Ethics. 2006 Jan;12(1):53-74 [PMID: 16501647]
  18. J Med Ethics. 2011 Feb;37(2):113-7 [PMID: 21081306]
  19. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2014 Jul 1;111(26):9437-42 [PMID: 24979796]
  20. Nat Med. 2006 Aug;12(8):867 [PMID: 16892019]
  21. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2012 Aug;73(2 Suppl 1):S3-6 [PMID: 22847090]
  22. Dev World Bioeth. 2013 Dec;13(3):149-57 [PMID: 22994914]
  23. PLoS Med. 2013;10(3):e1001315 [PMID: 23555197]
  24. Med Health Care Philos. 2015 May;18(2):177-84 [PMID: 25316327]
  25. Dev World Bioeth. 2010 Dec;10(3):164-71 [PMID: 19832885]
  26. Sci Eng Ethics. 2016 Feb;22(1):297-9 [PMID: 25794900]
  27. Sci Eng Ethics. 2013 Sep;19(3):1241-54 [PMID: 22535578]
  28. BMJ. 2014 Apr 03;348:g2563 [PMID: 24699129]
  29. Science. 2006 May 19;312(5776):987 [PMID: 16709758]
  30. Nature. 2012 Jan 11;481(7380):134-6 [PMID: 22237090]
  31. Lancet. 2015 Apr 11;385(9976):1365 [PMID: 25890401]
  32. Science. 2013 Nov 29;342(6162):1035-9 [PMID: 24288313]
  33. Dev World Bioeth. 2013 Dec;13(3):125-37 [PMID: 22994886]
  34. Nature. 2015 Apr 30;520(7549):S36 [PMID: 25924199]
  35. J Bioeth Inq. 2014 Sep;11(3):283-7 [PMID: 24952507]
  36. PLoS One. 2011;6(7):e22149 [PMID: 21765946]
  37. Sci Eng Ethics. 2018 Apr;24(2):629-645 [PMID: 28397174]
  38. Contemp Clin Trials. 2005 Apr;26(2):244-51 [PMID: 15837444]
  39. J Dent Res. 2010 Dec;89(12):1364-7 [PMID: 20940367]
  40. PLoS One. 2009 May 29;4(5):e5738 [PMID: 19478950]
  41. PLoS One. 2015 Jun 17;10(6):e0127556 [PMID: 26083381]

MeSH Term

Attitude
Awareness
Biomedical Research
China
Empirical Research
Humans
Interviews as Topic
Prevalence
Research Personnel
Scientific Misconduct
Surveys and Questionnaires

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0researchintegritystudiesChinamisconductempiricalevidencealsoreviewAcademicsubstantialbiomedicalscientificexploreChinesepublishedincludedmainlydatausedmethodsStudiesperceptionsreportedsystemBiomedicalResearchRecentdemonstratedoccursdegreesuggestedconcernseemsbasedlargelyanecdotalthereforesoughtsituationmakingsystematicOnepurposessummarizeexistingbodysearchedNationalKnowledgeInfrastructureWanfangDataPubMedWebSciencepotentiallyrelevantmeetinginclusioncriteriaiepresentingempiricallyobtainedpracticeextractedsynthesizedusinginductiveapproachTwenty-oneTwoqualitativeinterviewsnineteenquantitativequestionnairesinvolvedmedicalpostgraduatesnursesinvestigatedawarenessattitudesexperiencesparticipants21greatimportanceobeyacademicnormsNeverthelessoccurrencemisbehaviorsfabricationfalsificationplagiarismimproperauthorshipduplicatesubmissionStrengtheningtrainingdevelopinggovernanceimprovingevaluationareasparticularattentionseveraldemonstratesnumberarticlesdevotedprovidesafeguardmeasurestakencrucialconductresearchers'in-depthevaluatechangesIntegrityResearch:SystematicReviewmorality

Similar Articles

Cited By