Targeting body dissatisfaction among women with overweight or obesity: A proof-of-concept pilot study.

KayLoni L Olson, Tyler T Thaxton, Charles F Emery
Author Information
  1. KayLoni L Olson: Department of Psychology, Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio. ORCID
  2. Tyler T Thaxton: Department of Psychology, Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio.
  3. Charles F Emery: Department of Psychology, Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: This proof-of-concept study was designed to replicate the effects of the empirically-supported Body Project intervention on body dissatisfaction when combined with behavioral recommendations for weight loss among women with overweight or obesity.
METHOD: women with overweight or obesity who reported body dissatisfaction and a desire to lose weight were randomized to one of two 4-week treatment conditions. Individuals assigned to the standard group (n = 15) were directed to track diet and activity level daily. Body project (n = 17) participants tracked daily diet and activity, in addition to attending four weekly, group-based body project intervention sessions. Body mass index, body dissatisfaction, body appreciation, and internalization of thin ideal and weight stigma were evaluated before and after the treatment period.
RESULTS: Feasibility data suggest the Body Project can be implemented with this novel sample. Preliminary estimates suggest greater effects on body appreciation in the Body Project group than in the standard group (ES = 0.43), but no group effects for other body image variables.
CONCLUSIONS: With minor modifications, the Body Project was successfully implemented among women with overweight or obesity. The effect on body appreciation is encouraging and worthy of further investigation. Modification to the intervention may be necessary to enhance treatment effects on other body image variables.

Keywords

References

  1. Health Psychol. 2004 Sep;23(5):443-51 [PMID: 15367063]
  2. J Consult Clin Psychol. 2009 Oct;77(5):825-34 [PMID: 19803563]
  3. JAMA. 2013 Jan 2;309(1):71-82 [PMID: 23280227]
  4. Ann Behav Med. 1998 Winter;20(1):1-6 [PMID: 9755345]
  5. Diabetes Care. 2002 Dec;25(12):2165-71 [PMID: 12453955]
  6. Health Psychol. 2015 Oct;34(10):971-82 [PMID: 25642841]
  7. PLoS One. 2014 Jan 29;9(1):e86303 [PMID: 24489713]
  8. J Health Psychol. 2016 Jan;21(1):28-39 [PMID: 24532796]
  9. J Consult Clin Psychol. 2001 Jun;69(3):440-6 [PMID: 11495173]
  10. Obes Res. 1998 Sep;6 Suppl 2:51S-209S [PMID: 9813653]
  11. Psychol Bull. 2002 Sep;128(5):825-48 [PMID: 12206196]
  12. J Clin Psychol Med Settings. 2008 Sep;15(3):214-24 [PMID: 19104966]
  13. Int J Eat Disord. 2004 Apr;35(3):293-304 [PMID: 15048945]
  14. Obesity (Silver Spring). 2015 Jan;23(1):2-3 [PMID: 25504330]
  15. Behav Res Ther. 2013 May;51(4-5):197-206 [PMID: 23419888]
  16. Int J Eat Disord. 2000 Mar;27(2):206-17 [PMID: 10657894]
  17. Body Image. 2004 Jan;1(1):43-56 [PMID: 18089140]
  18. Body Image. 2004 May;1(2):155-67 [PMID: 18089148]
  19. Obes Facts. 2016;9(6):424-441 [PMID: 28013298]
  20. Health Psychol. 1997 May;16(3):226-9 [PMID: 9152700]
  21. Obesity (Silver Spring). 2015 Jan;23(1):7-15 [PMID: 25469998]
  22. Body Image. 2004 Jan;1(1):1-5 [PMID: 18089136]
  23. J Health Psychol. 2017 Jan 1;:1359105316689605 [PMID: 28810391]
  24. NCHS Data Brief. 2012 Jan;(82):1-8 [PMID: 22617494]

Grants

  1. UL1 TR001070/NCATS NIH HHS
  2. T32 HL076134/NHLBI NIH HHS

MeSH Term

Adult
Body Image
Female
Humans
Obesity
Overweight
Pilot Projects
Proof of Concept Study

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0bodyBodydissatisfactionweighteffectsProjectoverweightobesitygroupinterventionamongwomentreatmentappreciationimageproof-of-conceptstudylossstandarddietactivitydailyprojectsuggestimplementedvariablesOBJECTIVE:designedreplicateempirically-supportedcombinedbehavioralrecommendationsMETHOD:Womenreporteddesireloserandomizedonetwo4-weekconditionsIndividualsassignedn = 15directedtrackleveln = 17participantstrackedadditionattendingfourweeklygroup-basedsessionsmassindexinternalizationthinidealstigmaevaluatedperiodRESULTS:FeasibilitydatacannovelsamplePreliminaryestimatesgreaterES = 043CONCLUSIONS:minormodificationssuccessfullyeffectencouragingworthyinvestigationModificationmaynecessaryenhanceTargetingobesity:pilotmanagement

Similar Articles

Cited By (10)