Preoperative PROMIS Scores Predict Postoperative Outcomes After Primary ACL Reconstruction.

Raymond E Chen, M Owen Papuga, Ilya Voloshin, Gregg T Nicandri, John P Goldblatt, Robert D Bronstein, Lucien M Rouse, Michael D Maloney
Author Information
  1. Raymond E Chen: Department of Orthopaedics and Rehabilitation, University of Rochester, Rochester, New York, USA.
  2. M Owen Papuga: Department of Orthopaedics and Rehabilitation, University of Rochester, Rochester, New York, USA.
  3. Ilya Voloshin: Department of Orthopaedics and Rehabilitation, University of Rochester, Rochester, New York, USA.
  4. Gregg T Nicandri: Department of Orthopaedics and Rehabilitation, University of Rochester, Rochester, New York, USA.
  5. John P Goldblatt: Department of Orthopaedics and Rehabilitation, University of Rochester, Rochester, New York, USA.
  6. Robert D Bronstein: Department of Orthopaedics and Rehabilitation, University of Rochester, Rochester, New York, USA.
  7. Lucien M Rouse: Department of Orthopaedics and Rehabilitation, University of Rochester, Rochester, New York, USA.
  8. Michael D Maloney: Department of Orthopaedics and Rehabilitation, University of Rochester, Rochester, New York, USA.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: PROMIS (Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System) scores in patients undergoing anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction have not been fully described in the literature to date. The ability of preoperative patient-reported outcome scores to directly predict postoperative outcomes in patients who undergo primary ACL reconstruction is unknown.
HYPOTHESIS: Postoperative PROMIS physical function (PF), pain interference (PI), and depression (D) scores in patients who undergo ACL reconstruction will show improvement when compared with preoperative scores. Additionally, preoperative PROMIS PF, PI, and D scores will predict which patients will not achieve a minimal clinically important difference (MCID) postoperatively.
STUDY DESIGN: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3.
METHODS: A total of 233 patients who underwent primary ACL reconstruction between 2015 and 2016 and had completed PROMIS measures both preoperatively (within 60 days of surgery) and postoperatively (100-240 days after surgery) were included in this study. PROMIS PF, PI, and D scores were compared. Accuracy analyses were performed to determine whether preoperative PROMIS scores from each domain could predict postoperative achievement of MCID in the same domain. Cutoff scores were then calculated.
RESULTS: PROMIS PF, PI, and D scores all showed a significant improvement after ACL reconstruction (all < .001). Preoperative scores from all 3 PROMIS domains showed a strong ability to predict clinically meaningful improvement, as defined by MCID, with areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve from 0.72 to 0.84. Optimal cutoffs for preoperative PROMIS scores showed that patients with a PF score of <42.5, PI score of >56.2, or D score of >44.8 were more likely to achieve MCID.
CONCLUSION: PROMIS PF, PI, and D scores improved significantly in patients who underwent primary ACL reconstruction. Preoperative PROMIS PF, PI, and D scores were highly predictive of outcome in the early postoperative period. The reported cutoff scores showed high probability in predicting which patients would and would not achieve a clinically meaningful improvement.

Keywords

References

  1. Am J Sports Med. 2016 Mar;44(3):572-9 [PMID: 26628516]
  2. J Orthop Res. 2011 Jun;29(6):947-53 [PMID: 21437962]
  3. Foot Ankle Int. 2016 Sep;37(9):911-8 [PMID: 27530986]
  4. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2005 Aug;87(8):1673-9 [PMID: 16085604]
  5. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2016 Jun;25(6):913-9 [PMID: 27039669]
  6. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2016 Jul 15;41(14 ):1153-9 [PMID: 26909832]
  7. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2015 Sep 14;16:253 [PMID: 26369412]
  8. J Orthop Res. 2014 Jun;32(6):793-801 [PMID: 24532421]
  9. Am J Sports Med. 1999 Jul-Aug;27(4):444-54 [PMID: 10424213]
  10. Am J Sports Med. 2010 Oct;38(10 ):2040-50 [PMID: 20709944]
  11. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2016 Nov;24(11):744-749 [PMID: 27661391]
  12. Am J Sports Med. 2011 Feb;39(2):348-59 [PMID: 21084660]
  13. Arthroscopy. 2009 May;25(5):457-63 [PMID: 19409302]
  14. J Clin Epidemiol. 2011 May;64(5):507-16 [PMID: 21447427]
  15. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2017 Jan;475(1):149-157 [PMID: 26956248]
  16. Foot Ankle Int. 2014 Jan;35(1):1-7 [PMID: 24101733]
  17. Caspian J Intern Med. 2013 Spring;4(2):627-35 [PMID: 24009950]
  18. J Orthop Res. 2013 Jan;31(1):2-9 [PMID: 22912340]
  19. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2016 Feb;474(2):321-9 [PMID: 26201420]
  20. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2007 May;458:180-7 [PMID: 17308473]
  21. Am J Sports Med. 2003 Jan-Feb;31(1):2-11 [PMID: 12531750]
  22. Med Care. 2003 May;41(5):582-92 [PMID: 12719681]
  23. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2012 Jul;42(7):601-14 [PMID: 22402434]
  24. Clin Sports Med. 2017 Jan;36(1):1-8 [PMID: 27871652]

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0scoresPROMISpatientsACLreconstructionPFPIDpreoperativepredictimprovementMCIDshowedOutcomespostoperativeprimarywillachieveclinicallyPreoperativescorePatient-ReportedMeasurementInformationSystemanteriorcruciateligamentabilityoutcomeundergoPostoperativephysicalfunctionpaindepressioncomparedpostoperativelystudy3underwentdayssurgerydomainmeaningful0BACKGROUND:undergoingfullydescribedliteraturedatepatient-reporteddirectlyoutcomesunknownHYPOTHESIS:interferenceshowAdditionallyminimalimportantdifferenceSTUDYDESIGN:CohortLevelevidenceMETHODS:total23320152016completedmeasurespreoperativelywithin60100-240includedAccuracyanalysesperformeddeterminewhetherachievementCutoffcalculatedRESULTS:significant<001domainsstrongdefinedareasreceiveroperatingcharacteristiccurve7284Optimalcutoffs<425>562>448likelyCONCLUSION:improvedsignificantlyhighlypredictiveearlyperiodreportedcutoffhighprobabilitypredictingScoresPredictPrimaryReconstruction

Similar Articles

Cited By