Informative graphing of continuous safety variables relative to normal reference limits.

Christopher D Breder
Author Information
  1. Christopher D Breder: Division of Neurology Products, Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, MD, USA. cbreder1@jhu.edu.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Interpreting graphs of continuous safety variables can be complicated because differences in age, gender, and testing site methodologies data may give rise to multiple reference limits. Furthermore, data below the lower limit of normal are compressed relative to those points above the upper limit of normal. The objective of this study is to develop a graphing technique that addresses these issues and is visually intuitive.
METHODS: A mock dataset with multiple reference ranges is initially used to develop the graphing technique. Formulas are developed for conditions where data are above the upper limit of normal, normal, below the lower limit of normal, and below the lower limit of normal when the data value equals zero. After the formulae are developed, an anonymized dataset from an actual set of trials for an approved drug is evaluated comparing the technique developed in this study to standard graphical methods.
RESULTS: Formulas are derived for the novel graphing method based on multiples of the normal limits. The formula for values scaled between the upper and lower limits of normal is a novel application of a readily available scaling formula. The formula for the lower limit of normal is novel and addresses the issue of this value potentially being indeterminate when the result to be scaled as a multiple is zero.
CONCLUSIONS: The formulae and graphing method described in this study provides a visually intuitive method to graph continuous safety data including laboratory values, vital sign data.

Keywords

References

  1. Hum Factors. 2014 May;56(3):569-80 [PMID: 24930176]
  2. IEEE Trans Vis Comput Graph. 2006 Sep-Oct;12(5):845-52 [PMID: 17080808]
  3. Lancet. 1994 Aug 6;344(8919):386-9 [PMID: 7914312]
  4. J Electrocardiol. 2011 Sep-Oct;44(5):502-8 [PMID: 21871996]
  5. JAMA. 1974 Jan 21;227(3):325 [PMID: 4859667]
  6. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 1987 Jan;111(1):9-15 [PMID: 3800611]
  7. Drug Saf. 2012 Oct 1;35(10 ):865-75 [PMID: 22928730]
  8. Clin Chem Lab Med. 2001 Jan;39(1):50-2 [PMID: 11256801]
  9. Clin Chem. 1974 Mar;20(3):402-3 [PMID: 4813396]
  10. J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich). 2009 Aug;11(8):422-5 [PMID: 19695029]
  11. J Air Pollut Control Assoc. 1976 Jan;26(1):36-8 [PMID: 1244365]
  12. Anesthesiology. 2002 Mar;96(3):565-75 [PMID: 11873029]
  13. J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2009 Nov 01;3(6):1395-401 [PMID: 20144394]
  14. Pharm Stat. 2008 Jan-Mar;7(1):20-35 [PMID: 17323410]
  15. Anesth Analg. 2013 Oct;117(4):876-82 [PMID: 23449852]
  16. Tokai J Exp Clin Med. 1986 May;11(2):133-43 [PMID: 3564079]
  17. Am J Clin Pathol. 1983 Oct;80(4 Suppl):577-84 [PMID: 6624728]

MeSH Term

Algorithms
Biomedical Research
Computer Graphics
Data Interpretation, Statistical
Humans
Information Dissemination
Medical Informatics Applications
Medical Informatics Computing
Models, Theoretical
Reference Values

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0normaldatalimitlowergraphinglimitscontinuoussafetymultiplereferenceupperstudytechniquedevelopednovelmethodformulavariablesrelativedevelopaddressesvisuallyintuitivedatasetFormulasvaluezeroformulaevaluesscaledBACKGROUND:InterpretinggraphscancomplicateddifferencesagegendertestingsitemethodologiesmaygiveriseFurthermorecompressedpointsobjectiveissuesMETHODS:mockrangesinitiallyusedconditionsequalsanonymizedactualsettrialsapproveddrugevaluatedcomparingstandardgraphicalmethodsRESULTS:derivedbasedmultiplesapplicationreadilyavailablescalingissuepotentiallyindeterminateresultCONCLUSIONS:describedprovidesgraphincludinglaboratoryvitalsignInformativeMultiplesMultiplicativeinverseReferencerangeScaling

Similar Articles

Cited By