Mouse- and Human-derived Primary Gastric Epithelial Monolayer Culture for the Study of Regeneration.

Emma Teal, Nina G Steele, Jayati Chakrabarti, Loryn Holokai, Yana Zavros
Author Information
  1. Emma Teal: Department of Pharmacology and Systems Physiology, University of Cincinnati.
  2. Nina G Steele: Department of Cell & Developmental Biology, University of Michigan.
  3. Jayati Chakrabarti: Department of Pharmacology and Systems Physiology, University of Cincinnati.
  4. Loryn Holokai: Department of Molecular Genetics, Biochemistry & Microbiology, University of Cincinnati.
  5. Yana Zavros: Department of Pharmacology and Systems Physiology, University of Cincinnati; yana.zavros@uc.edu.

Abstract

In vitro studies of gastric wound repair typically involves the use of gastric cancer cell lines in a scratch-wound assay of cellular proliferation and migration. One critical limitation of such assays, however, is their homogenous assortment of cellular types. Repair is a complex process which demands the interaction of several cell types. Therefore, to study a culture devoid of cellular subtypes, is a concern that must be overcome if we are to understand the repair process. The gastric organoid model may alleviate this issue whereby the heterogeneous collection of cell types closely reflects that of the gastric epithelium or other native tissues in vivo. Demonstrated here is a novel, in vitro scratch-wound assay derived from human or mouse 3-dimensional organoids which can then be transferred to a gastric epithelial monolayer as either intact organoids or as a single cell suspension of dissociated organoids. The goal of the protocol is to establish organoid-derived gastric epithelial monolayers that can be used in a novel scratch-wound assay system to study gastric regeneration.

References

  1. J Lab Autom. 2012 Feb;17(1):59-65 [PMID: 22357609]
  2. Cell Mol Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2016 May 17;2(5):605-624 [PMID: 27990460]
  3. PLoS Pathog. 2015 Feb 06;11(2):e1004663 [PMID: 25658601]
  4. Dig Dis Sci. 1998 Sep;43(9 Suppl):46S-55S [PMID: 9753226]
  5. Dig Dis Sci. 2005 Oct;50 Suppl 1:S24-33 [PMID: 16184417]
  6. J Infect Dis. 2009 Mar 1;199(5):641-51 [PMID: 19199544]
  7. Wound Repair Regen. 2013 Nov-Dec;21(6):897-903 [PMID: 24134182]
  8. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2010 Jul 30;398(3):559-64 [PMID: 20599756]
  9. J Pathol. 2017 Aug;242(4):463-475 [PMID: 28497484]
  10. Gut. 2016 Feb;65(2):202-13 [PMID: 25539675]
  11. Gastroenterology. 2010 Dec;139(6):2028-2037.e9 [PMID: 20854822]
  12. Nature. 1990 Jan 4;343(6253):82-5 [PMID: 2296294]
  13. Am J Surg Pathol. 1998 Apr;22(4):383-90 [PMID: 9537465]
  14. World J Gastroenterol. 2016 Sep 7;22(33):7536-58 [PMID: 27672275]

Grants

  1. P30 DK078392/NIDDK NIH HHS
  2. R01 DK083402/NIDDK NIH HHS

MeSH Term

Animals
Cell Culture Techniques
Gastric Mucosa
Humans
Mice
Regeneration

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0gastriccellscratch-woundassaycellulartypesorganoidsvitrorepairprocessstudynovelcanepithelialstudieswoundtypicallyinvolvesusecancerlinesproliferationmigrationOnecriticallimitationassayshoweverhomogenousassortmentRepaircomplexdemandsinteractionseveralThereforeculturedevoidsubtypesconcernmustovercomeunderstandorganoidmodelmayalleviateissuewherebyheterogeneouscollectioncloselyreflectsepitheliumnativetissuesvivoDemonstratedderivedhumanmouse3-dimensionaltransferredmonolayereitherintactsinglesuspensiondissociatedgoalprotocolestablishorganoid-derivedmonolayersusedsystemregenerationMouse-Human-derivedPrimaryGastricEpithelialMonolayerCultureStudyRegeneration

Similar Articles

Cited By