Exercise motivational regulations and exercise addiction: The mediating role of passion.

Álvaro Sicilia, Manuel Alcaraz-Ibáñez, María-Jesús Lirola, Rafael Burgueño, Anthony Maher
Author Information
  1. Álvaro Sicilia: 1 Facultad de Ciencias de la Eduación, Universidad de Almería , Almería, Spain.
  2. Manuel Alcaraz-Ibáñez: 1 Facultad de Ciencias de la Eduación, Universidad de Almería , Almería, Spain.
  3. María-Jesús Lirola: 1 Facultad de Ciencias de la Eduación, Universidad de Almería , Almería, Spain.
  4. Rafael Burgueño: 1 Facultad de Ciencias de la Eduación, Universidad de Almería , Almería, Spain.
  5. Anthony Maher: 2 Department of Sport and Physical Activity, Edge Hill University , Ormskirk, UK.

Abstract

Background and aims The study explored the mediating role of forms of passion in the relationship between motivational regulations in exercise and exercise addiction (EA). Methods A total of 485 university students (368 males and 117 females; M = 20.43, SD = 3.21) completed a questionnaire measuring the frequency and intensity of exercise, motivational regulations in exercise, passion for exercise, and EA. Controlling the effects of age, frequency, and intensity of practice, the relationships between the study variables were examined though a path analysis. Results Both self-determined and non-self-determined forms of motivation showed positive association with EA. The forms of motivation with greatest predictive power for EA were introjected and integrated regulations. Both forms of motivation had positive direct and indirect effects through obsessive passion (OP) on EA; however, integrated regulation also showed negative indirect effects through harmonious passion on EA. Conclusions Both forms of passion and, especially, OP, seem to affect how motivational regulations are associated with EA. These findings clarify the association found in previous studies between self-determined forms of motivation and EA.

Keywords

References

  1. Psicothema. 2013;25(3):377-83 [PMID: 23910754]
  2. Res Q Exerc Sport. 2012 Jun;83(2):318-29 [PMID: 22808718]
  3. Psychol Methods. 2002 Dec;7(4):422-45 [PMID: 12530702]
  4. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2011 Oct;8(10):4025-38 [PMID: 22073026]
  5. J Behav Addict. 2013 Dec;2(4):249-52 [PMID: 25215208]
  6. Span J Psychol. 2011 May;14(1):421-31 [PMID: 21568198]
  7. Can J Appl Sport Sci. 1985 Sep;10(3):141-6 [PMID: 4053261]
  8. Eval Health Prof. 2011 Mar;34(1):3-56 [PMID: 20876085]
  9. J Sports Med Phys Fitness. 2002 Jun;42(2):233-8 [PMID: 12032421]
  10. Psychol Bull. 2017 Dec;143(12):1346-1377 [PMID: 29048175]
  11. J Health Psychol. 2006 Nov;11(6):887-903 [PMID: 17035261]
  12. J Pers Soc Psychol. 2003 Oct;85(4):756-67 [PMID: 14561128]
  13. J Sports Sci. 2014;32(3):259-67 [PMID: 24016203]
  14. J Phys Act Health. 2013 Feb;10(2):176-84 [PMID: 23407442]
  15. Subst Use Misuse. 2012 Mar;47(4):403-17 [PMID: 22216780]
  16. Psicothema. 2010 Nov;22(4):841-7 [PMID: 21044522]

MeSH Term

Behavior, Addictive
Cross-Sectional Studies
Exercise
Female
Humans
Male
Motivation
Obsessive Behavior
Students
Surveys and Questionnaires
Universities
Young Adult

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0EApassionexerciseformsregulationsmotivationmotivationaleffectsstudymediatingrolefrequencyintensityself-determinedshowedpositiveassociationintegratedindirectOPBackgroundaimsexploredrelationshipaddictionMethodstotal485universitystudents368males117femalesM = 2043SD = 321completedquestionnairemeasuringControllingagepracticerelationshipsvariablesexaminedthoughpathanalysisResultsnon-self-determinedgreatestpredictivepowerintrojecteddirectobsessivehoweverregulationalsonegativeharmoniousConclusionsespeciallyseemaffectassociatedfindingsclarifyfoundpreviousstudiesExerciseaddiction:dualisticmodeldependenceinternalizationself-determinationtheory

Similar Articles

Cited By