Agricultural matrices affect ground ant assemblage composition inside forest fragments.

Diego Santana Assis, Iracenir Andrade Dos Santos, Flavio Nunes Ramos, Katty Elena Barrios-Rojas, Jonathan David Majer, Evaldo Ferreira Vilela
Author Information
  1. Diego Santana Assis: Departamento de Entomologia, Universidade Federal de Viçosa, Viçosa, Minas Gerais, Brazil. ORCID
  2. Iracenir Andrade Dos Santos: Centro de Formação Interdisciplinar Universidade Federal do Oeste do Pará, Santarém, Pará, Brazil.
  3. Flavio Nunes Ramos: Instituto de Ciências da Natureza, Universidade Federal de Alfenas, Alfenas, Minas Gerais, Brazil.
  4. Katty Elena Barrios-Rojas: Departamento de Entomologia, Universidade Federal de Viçosa, Viçosa, Minas Gerais, Brazil. ORCID
  5. Jonathan David Majer: School of Biological Sciences, University of Western Australia, Perth, Australia.
  6. Evaldo Ferreira Vilela: Departamento de Entomologia, Universidade Federal de Viçosa, Viçosa, Minas Gerais, Brazil.

Abstract

The establishment of agricultural matrices generally involves deforestation, which leads to fragmentation of the remaining forest. This fragmentation can affect forest dynamics both positively and negatively. Since most animal species are affected, certain groups can be used to measure the impact of such fragmentation. This study aimed to measure the impacts of agricultural crops (matrices) on ant communities of adjacent lower montane Atlantic rainforest fragments. We sampled nine forest fragments at locations surrounded by different agricultural matrices, namely: coffee (3 replicates); sugarcane (3); and pasture (3). At each site we installed pitfall traps along a 500 m transect from the interior of the matrix to the interior of the fragment (20 pitfall traps ~25 m apart). Each transect was partitioned into four categories: interior of the matrix; edge of the matrix; edge of the fragment; and interior of the fragment. For each sample site, we measured ant species richness and ant community composition within each transect category. Ant richness and composition differed between fragments and matrices. Each sample location had a specific composition of ants, probably because of the influence of the nature and management of the agricultural matrices. Species composition in the coffee matrix had the highest similarity to its corresponding fragment. The variability in species composition within forest fragments surrounded by pasture was greatest when compared with forest fragments surrounded by sugarcane or, to a lesser extent, coffee. Functional guild composition differed between locations, but the most representative guild was 'generalist' both in the agricultural matrices and forest fragments. Our results are important for understanding how agricultural matrices act on ant communities, and also, how these isolated forest fragments could act as an island of biodiversity in an 'ocean of crops'.

References

  1. Am Nat. 2001 Jul;158(1):87-99 [PMID: 18707317]
  2. Trends Ecol Evol. 1995 Feb;10(2):58-62 [PMID: 21236953]
  3. PLoS One. 2013 Dec 04;8(12):e82369 [PMID: 24324776]
  4. Nature. 2000 May 11;405(6783):234-42 [PMID: 10821284]
  5. Trends Ecol Evol. 1999 Nov;14(11):450-453 [PMID: 10511724]
  6. PLoS One. 2017 Feb 24;12 (2):e0172464 [PMID: 28234948]
  7. Biometrics. 2006 Mar;62(1):245-53 [PMID: 16542252]
  8. Conserv Biol. 2017 Aug;31(4):924-933 [PMID: 27982481]
  9. Trends Ecol Evol. 2004 Jan;19(1):18-24 [PMID: 16701221]
  10. J Insect Sci. 2010;10:98 [PMID: 20673122]
  11. Conserv Biol. 2007 Jun;21(3):741-51 [PMID: 17531052]
  12. PLoS One. 2013 Sep 13;8(9):e74852 [PMID: 24058634]
  13. Conserv Biol. 2009 Aug;23(4):948-56 [PMID: 19627322]
  14. Science. 1993 Jun 25;260(5116):1905-10 [PMID: 17836720]
  15. Trends Ecol Evol. 1999 Apr;14(4):135-139 [PMID: 10322518]
  16. PLoS One. 2015 Apr 20;10(4):e0124807 [PMID: 25894540]
  17. Science. 2000 May 26;288(5470):1356-8 [PMID: 10847849]
  18. J Anim Ecol. 2008 May;77(3):505-11 [PMID: 18248385]
  19. PLoS One. 2016 Oct 19;11(10 ):e0164814 [PMID: 27760218]
  20. J Insect Sci. 2013;13:29 [PMID: 23902334]
  21. Ecol Evol. 2017 Jan 18;7(3):1009-1017 [PMID: 28168036]
  22. Oecologia. 2012 Aug;169(4):1063-74 [PMID: 22294027]

MeSH Term

Agriculture
Animals
Ants
Ecosystem
Forests

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0matricesforestfragmentscompositionagriculturalantinteriormatrixfragmentfragmentationspeciessurroundedcoffee3transectcanaffectmeasurecommunitieslocationssugarcanepasturesitepitfalltrapsmedgesamplerichnesswithindifferedguildactestablishmentgenerallyinvolvesdeforestationleadsremainingdynamicspositivelynegativelySinceanimalaffectedcertaingroupsusedimpactstudyaimedimpactscropsadjacentlowermontaneAtlanticrainforestsampledninedifferentnamely:replicatesinstalledalong50020~25apartpartitionedfourcategories:measuredcommunitycategoryAntlocationspecificantsprobablyinfluencenaturemanagementSpecieshighestsimilaritycorrespondingvariabilitygreatestcomparedlesserextentFunctionalrepresentative'generalist'resultsimportantunderstandingalsoisolatedislandbiodiversity'oceancrops'Agriculturalgroundassemblageinside

Similar Articles

Cited By

No available data.