"Like finding a unicorn": Healthcare preferences among lesbian, gay, and bisexual people in the United States.

Alexander J Martos, Patrick A Wilson, Allegra R Gordon, Marguerita Lightfoot, Ilan H Meyer
Author Information
  1. Alexander J Martos: Department of Sociomedical Sciences, Columbia University Mailman School of Public Health, New York, NY, USA; The Williams Institute, UCLA School of Law, Los Angeles, CA, USA. Electronic address: ajm2230@cumc.columbia.edu.
  2. Patrick A Wilson: Department of Sociomedical Sciences, Columbia University Mailman School of Public Health, New York, NY, USA.
  3. Allegra R Gordon: Division of Adolescent and Young Adult Medicine, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA; Department of Pediatrics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
  4. Marguerita Lightfoot: Department of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.
  5. Ilan H Meyer: The Williams Institute, UCLA School of Law, Los Angeles, CA, USA.

Abstract

Lesbian, gay, and bisexual (LGB) peoples' healthcare preferences are often developed in response to social and institutional factors that can ultimately deter them from care. Prior qualitative explorations of LGB healthcare preferences have been limited in their ability to identify and compare patterns across age cohort, gender, and race/ethnicity. The current study examines qualitative data from 186 modified Life Story Interviews with three age cohorts of LGB people from New York City, NY, San Francisco, CA, Tucson, AZ, and Austin, TX to understand the factors influencing LGB people's healthcare preferences. Data are analyzed using a directed content analysis approach. Five key themes emerged regarding influences on healthcare preferences: Stigma, provider expertise, identity, service type, and access. Findings suggest that healthcare preferences among LGB people are both complex and closely linked to social changes over time. Healthcare preferences among LGB people are both complex and closely linked to social changes over time.

Keywords

References

  1. Am J Nurs. 2014 Jun;114(6):24-34; quiz 35, 45 [PMID: 24826970]
  2. Qual Health Res. 2005 Nov;15(9):1277-88 [PMID: 16204405]
  3. Annu Rev Public Health. 2010;31:457-77 [PMID: 20070195]
  4. Health Aff (Millwood). 2002 Sep-Oct;21(5):165-73 [PMID: 12224879]
  5. J Health Soc Behav. 1995 Mar;36(1):1-10 [PMID: 7738325]
  6. Med Care. 2008 Jul;46(7):647-53 [PMID: 18580382]
  7. PLoS One. 2013 Aug 19;8(8):e71546 [PMID: 23977073]
  8. Psychosoc Med. 2012;9:Doc11 [PMID: 23133505]
  9. J Natl Med Assoc. 2004 Jan;96(1):97-107 [PMID: 14746359]
  10. LGBT Health. 2014 Mar;1(1):34-41 [PMID: 26789508]
  11. PLoS One. 2017 Jul 10;12(7):e0180544 [PMID: 28692659]
  12. J Gen Intern Med. 2010 Dec;25(12):1300-8 [PMID: 20714819]
  13. LGBT Health. 2017 Jun;4(3):227-231 [PMID: 28358625]
  14. Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am. 2017 Mar;44(1):71-80 [PMID: 28160894]
  15. Sex Transm Dis. 2007 Feb;34(2):113-9 [PMID: 16810121]
  16. Milbank Mem Fund Q Health Soc. 1973 Winter;51(1):95-124 [PMID: 4198894]

Grants

  1. P2C HD041022/NICHD NIH HHS
  2. R01 HD078526/NICHD NIH HHS

MeSH Term

Adolescent
Adult
Female
Health Services Accessibility
Homosexuality, Female
Homosexuality, Male
Humans
Male
Middle Aged
Patient Preference
Sexual and Gender Minorities
Social Stigma
United States
Young Adult

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0LGBpreferenceshealthcarepeoplebisexualsocialamongHealthcareLesbiangayfactorsqualitativeageaccesscomplexcloselylinkedchangestimeUnitedStatespeoples'oftendevelopedresponseinstitutionalcanultimatelydetercarePriorexplorationslimitedabilityidentifycomparepatternsacrosscohortgenderrace/ethnicitycurrentstudyexaminesdata186modifiedLifeStoryInterviewsthreecohortsNewYorkCityNYSanFranciscoCATucsonAZAustinTXunderstandinfluencingpeople'sDataanalyzedusingdirectedcontentanalysisapproachFivekeythemesemergedregardinginfluencespreferences:StigmaproviderexpertiseidentityservicetypeFindingssuggest"Likefindingunicorn":lesbianAndhealthGay

Similar Articles

Cited By (25)