On the Mechanisms of Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (TMS): How Brain State and Baseline Performance Level Determine Behavioral Effects of TMS.

Juha Silvanto, Silvia Bona, Marco Marelli, Zaira Cattaneo
Author Information
  1. Juha Silvanto: Department of Psychology, Faculty of Science and Technology, University of Westminster, London, United Kingdom.
  2. Silvia Bona: Department of Psychology, University of Milano-Bicocca, Milan, Italy.
  3. Marco Marelli: Department of Psychology, University of Milano-Bicocca, Milan, Italy.
  4. Zaira Cattaneo: Department of Psychology, University of Milano-Bicocca, Milan, Italy.

Abstract

The behavioral effects of Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (TMS) can change qualitatively when stimulation is preceded by initial state manipulations such as priming or adaptation. In addition, baseline performance level of the participant has been shown to play a role in modulating the impact of TMS. Here we examined the link between these two factors. This was done using data from a previous study using a TMS-priming paradigm, in which, at group level, TMS selectively facilitated targets incongruent with the prime while having no statistically significant effects on other prime-target congruencies. Correlation and linear mixed-effects analyses indicated that, for all prime-target congruencies, a significant linear relationship between baseline performance and the magnitude of the induced TMS effect was present: low levels of baseline performance were associated with TMS-induced facilitations and high baseline performance with impairments. Thus as performance level increased, TMS effects turned from facilitation to impairment. The key finding was that priming shifted the transition from facilitatory to disruptive effects for targets incongruent with the prime, such that TMS-induced facilitations were obtained until a higher level of performance than for other prime-target congruencies. Given that brain state manipulations such as priming operate via modulations of neural excitability, this result is consistent with the view that neural excitability, coupled with non-linear neural effects, underlie behavioral effects of TMS.

Keywords

References

  1. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2013 Sep;37(8):1702-12 [PMID: 23827785]
  2. J Neurophysiol. 2007 May;97(5):3155-64 [PMID: 17344377]
  3. Exp Brain Res. 2005 Jan;160(1):118-28 [PMID: 15368086]
  4. J Physiol. 2003 Dec 1;553(Pt 2):665-79 [PMID: 12963791]
  5. Neuron. 2003 Aug 14;39(4):681-91 [PMID: 12925281]
  6. J Neurosci. 2015 Jan 14;35(2):731-8 [PMID: 25589766]
  7. Brain Cogn. 2017 Dec;119:32-38 [PMID: 28963993]
  8. Cogn Neurosci. 2012;3(3-4):227-237 [PMID: 23144664]
  9. Cereb Cortex. 2002 Jun;12(6):663-9 [PMID: 12003865]
  10. Trends Cogn Sci. 2008 Dec;12(12):447-54 [PMID: 18951833]
  11. Brain Stimul. 2015 Nov-Dec;8(6):1175-82 [PMID: 26169802]
  12. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2014 Sep;45:295-304 [PMID: 25010557]
  13. Cereb Cortex. 2006 Dec;16(12):1766-70 [PMID: 16407478]
  14. Front Psychol. 2011 Feb 25;2:29 [PMID: 21713175]
  15. Eur J Neurosci. 2007 Mar;25(6):1874-81 [PMID: 17408427]
  16. Neuroimage. 2014 Sep;98:306-13 [PMID: 24807400]
  17. J Neurosci. 2012 Aug 1;32(31):10554-61 [PMID: 22855805]
  18. Hum Brain Mapp. 2017 Jan;38(1):339-351 [PMID: 27611342]
  19. Neuroscience. 2017 Nov 5;363:134-141 [PMID: 28893648]
  20. Neuroimage. 2012 Feb 1;59(3):3015-20 [PMID: 22023740]
  21. J Neurosci. 2011 Mar 2;31(9):3143-7 [PMID: 21368025]
  22. J Neurosci. 2011 Mar 2;31(9):3290-4 [PMID: 21368040]
  23. Nat Neurosci. 2004 Jan;7(1):13-4 [PMID: 14699413]

Grants

  1. 336152/European Research Council

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0TMSeffectsperformanceprimingbaselinelevelprime-targetcongruenciesneuralexcitabilitybehavioralTranscranialMagneticStimulationstimulationstatemanipulationsusingtargetsincongruentprimesignificantlinearTMS-inducedfacilitationsfacilitationbraincanchangequalitativelyprecededinitialadaptationadditionparticipantshownplayrolemodulatingimpactexaminedlinktwofactorsdonedatapreviousstudyTMS-primingparadigmgroupselectivelyfacilitatedstatisticallyCorrelationmixed-effectsanalysesindicatedrelationshipmagnitudeinducedeffectpresent:lowlevelsassociatedhighimpairmentsThusincreasedturnedimpairmentkeyfindingshiftedtransitionfacilitatorydisruptiveobtainedhigherGivenoperateviamodulationsresultconsistentviewcouplednon-linearunderlieMechanisms:BrainStateBaselinePerformanceLevelDetermineBehavioralEffectsvisualcortex

Similar Articles

Cited By