Efficacy of Carbohydrate Ingestion on CrossFit Exercise Performance.

Jaden A Rountree, Ben M Krings, Timothy J Peterson, Adam G Thigpen, Matthew J McAllister, Megan E Holmes, JohnEric W Smith
Author Information
  1. Jaden A Rountree: Department of Kinesiology, University of Alabama, Tuscaloosa, AL 34587, USA. jarountree@crimson.ua.edu.
  2. Ben M Krings: Department of Kinesiology, Mississippi State University, Starkville, MS 39762, USA. bmk216@msstate.edu.
  3. Timothy J Peterson: Department of Kinesiology, Mississippi State University, Starkville, MS 39762, USA. tjp91@msstate.edu.
  4. Adam G Thigpen: Department of Kinesiology, Mississippi State University, Starkville, MS 39762, USA. agt42@msstate.edu.
  5. Matthew J McAllister: Department of Kinesiology, Mississippi State University, Starkville, MS 39762, USA. mjm639@msstate.edu.
  6. Megan E Holmes: Department of Kinesiology, Mississippi State University, Starkville, MS 39762, USA. mholmes@colled.msstate.edu.
  7. JohnEric W Smith: Department of Kinesiology, Mississippi State University, Starkville, MS 39762, USA. jws597@msstate.edu. ORCID

Abstract

The efficacy of carbohydrate (CHO) ingestion during high-intensity strength and conditioning type exercise has yield mixed results. However, little is known about shorter duration high-intensity exercise such as CrossFit. The purpose of this study was to investigate the performance impact of CHO ingestion during high-intensity exercise sessions lasting approximately 30 min. Eight healthy males participated in a total of four trials; two familiarizations, a CHO trial, and a similarly flavored, non-caloric placebo (PLA) trial. CrossFit's "Fight Gone Bad Five" (FGBF) workout of the day was the exercise model which incorporated five rounds of maximal repetition exercises, wall throw, box jump, sumo deadlift high pull, push press, and rowing, followed by one minute of rest. Total repetitions and calories expended were summated from each round to quantify total work (FGBF score). No difference was found for the total work between CHO (321 ± 51) or PLA (314 ± 52) trials ( = 0.38). There were also no main effects ( > 0.05) for treatment comparing exercise performance across rounds. Based on the findings of this study, it does not appear that ingestion of CHO during short duration, high-intensity CrossFit exercise will provide a beneficial performance effect.

Keywords

References

  1. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1993 Mar;25(3):349-54 [PMID: 8455450]
  2. J Strength Cond Res. 2008 Jul;22(4):1101-7 [PMID: 18545201]
  3. Int J Sports Med. 1997 Feb;18(2):125-9 [PMID: 9081269]
  4. J Strength Cond Res. 2012 Jun;26(6):1717-23 [PMID: 22614150]
  5. J Int Soc Sports Nutr. 2016 Nov 10;13:40 [PMID: 27843418]
  6. Int J Sport Nutr Exerc Metab. 2000 Sep;10(3):326-39 [PMID: 10997956]
  7. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2002 Apr;34(4):723-31 [PMID: 11932585]
  8. Int J Exerc Sci. 2016 Oct 1;9(3):460-470 [PMID: 27766133]
  9. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2001 Aug;33(8):1270-8 [PMID: 11474326]
  10. J Strength Cond Res. 2004 May;18(2):201-5 [PMID: 15142025]
  11. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2016 Mar;48(3):543-68 [PMID: 26891166]
  12. Appetite. 2014 Sep;80:212-9 [PMID: 24858834]
  13. J Physiol. 1995 Nov 15;489 ( Pt 1):243-50 [PMID: 8583408]
  14. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2004 Sep;36(9):1543-50 [PMID: 15354036]
  15. Eur J Sport Sci. 2017 Sep;17 (8):955-963 [PMID: 28581367]
  16. J Int Soc Sports Nutr. 2016 Nov 3;13:39 [PMID: 27822169]
  17. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2008 Jan;40(1):96-103 [PMID: 18091017]
  18. Springerplus. 2014 Jul 21;3:369 [PMID: 25110627]
  19. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2004 Dec;36(12):2107-11 [PMID: 15570147]
  20. Int J Sport Nutr Exerc Metab. 2017 Jun;27(3):204-212 [PMID: 28182508]
  21. Sports Med. 2010 Sep 1;40(9):747-63 [PMID: 20726621]
  22. Can J Appl Physiol. 1999 Jun;24(3):209-15 [PMID: 10364416]
  23. J Strength Cond Res. 2013 Nov;27(11):3084-90 [PMID: 23442284]
  24. J Physiol. 1974 Aug;241(1):45-57 [PMID: 4278539]
  25. J Sports Sci. 2011;29 Suppl 1:S17-27 [PMID: 21660838]
  26. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2005 Feb;37(2):306-15 [PMID: 15692328]
  27. J Appl Physiol (1985). 1986 Jul;61(1):165-72 [PMID: 3525502]
  28. J Sports Med Phys Fitness. 2001 Jun;41(2):216-22 [PMID: 11447365]
  29. Pflugers Arch. 2003 May;446(2):211-9 [PMID: 12739159]
  30. J Physiol. 2009 Apr 15;587(Pt 8):1779-94 [PMID: 19237430]
  31. Sports Med. 2000 Jun;29(6):407-24 [PMID: 10870867]

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0exerciseCHOhigh-intensityingestionCrossFitperformancetotalstrengthdurationstudytrialstrialPLAFGBFroundswork±0efficacycarbohydrateconditioningtypeyieldmixedresultsHoweverlittleknownshorterpurposeinvestigateimpactsessionslastingapproximately30minEighthealthymalesparticipatedfourtwofamiliarizationssimilarlyflavorednon-caloricplaceboCrossFit's"FightGoneBadFive"workoutdaymodelincorporatedfivemaximalrepetitionexerciseswallthrowboxjumpsumodeadlifthighpullpushpressrowingfollowedoneminuterestTotalrepetitionscaloriesexpendedsummatedroundquantifyscoredifferencefound3215131452=38alsomaineffects>05treatmentcomparingacrossBasedfindingsappearshortwillprovidebeneficialeffectEfficacyCarbohydrateIngestionExercisePerformanceergogenicaidsresistancetraining

Similar Articles

Cited By