Binning enables efficient host genome reconstruction in cnidarian holobionts.

Juan Sebastián Celis, Daniel Wibberg, Catalina Ramírez-Portilla, Oliver Rupp, Alexander Sczyrba, Anika Winkler, Jörn Kalinowski, Thomas Wilke
Author Information
  1. Juan Sebastián Celis: Animal Ecology and Systematics, Justus Liebig University Giessen. Heinrich-Buff-Ring 26-32 (IFZ), 35392 Giessen, Germany.
  2. Daniel Wibberg: Center for Biotechnology, Bielefeld University, Universitätsstraße 27, 33615 Bielefeld, Germany.
  3. Catalina Ramírez-Portilla: Animal Ecology and Systematics, Justus Liebig University Giessen. Heinrich-Buff-Ring 26-32 (IFZ), 35392 Giessen, Germany.
  4. Oliver Rupp: Bioinformatics and Systems Biology, Justus Liebig University Giessen, Heinrich-Buff-Ring 58, 35392 Giessen, Germany.
  5. Alexander Sczyrba: Center for Biotechnology, Bielefeld University, Universitätsstraße 27, 33615 Bielefeld, Germany.
  6. Anika Winkler: Center for Biotechnology, Bielefeld University, Universitätsstraße 27, 33615 Bielefeld, Germany.
  7. Jörn Kalinowski: Center for Biotechnology, Bielefeld University, Universitätsstraße 27, 33615 Bielefeld, Germany.
  8. Thomas Wilke: Animal Ecology and Systematics, Justus Liebig University Giessen. Heinrich-Buff-Ring 26-32 (IFZ), 35392 Giessen, Germany.

Abstract

Background: Many cnidarians, including stony corals, engage in complex symbiotic associations, comprising the eukaryotic host, photosynthetic algae, and highly diverse microbial communities-together referred to as holobiont. This taxonomic complexity makes sequencing and assembling coral host genomes extremely challenging. Therefore, previous cnidarian genomic projects were based on symbiont-free tissue samples. However, this approach may not be applicable to the majority of cnidarian species for ecological reasons. We therefore evaluated the performance of an alternative method based on sequence binning for reconstructing the genome of the stony coral Porites rus from a hologenomic sample and compared it to traditional approaches.
Results: Our results demonstrate that binning performs well for hologenomic data, producing sufficient reads for assembling the draft genome of P. rus. An assembly evaluation based on operational criteria showed results that were comparable to symbiont-free approaches in terms of completeness and usefulness, despite a high degree of fragmentation in our assembly. In addition, we found that binning provides sufficient data for exploratory k-mer estimation of genomic features, such as genome size and heterozygosity.
Conclusions: Binning constitutes a powerful approach for disentangling taxonomically complex coral hologenomes. Considering the recent decline of coral reefs on the one hand and previous limitations to coral genome sequencing on the other hand, binning may facilitate rapid and reliable genome assembly. This study also provides an important milestone in advancing binning from the metagenomic to the hologenomic and from the prokaryotic to the eukaryotic level.

References

  1. PLoS One. 2014 Jan 10;9(1):e85568 [PMID: 24427317]
  2. FEMS Microbiol Ecol. 2016 Feb;92(2): [PMID: 26738557]
  3. Sci Rep. 2015 Dec 10;5:18211 [PMID: 26656261]
  4. Gigascience. 2013 Jul 22;2(1):10 [PMID: 23870653]
  5. Brief Funct Genomics. 2012 Jan;11(1):25-37 [PMID: 22184334]
  6. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2015 Sep;99(18):7791-803 [PMID: 25998656]
  7. J Mol Biol. 1990 Oct 5;215(3):403-10 [PMID: 2231712]
  8. Nucleic Acids Res. 2007 Jan;35(Database issue):D332-8 [PMID: 17090588]
  9. Nucleic Acids Res. 2016 Jan 4;44(D1):D710-6 [PMID: 26687719]
  10. Nat Rev Genet. 2013 Mar;14(3):157-67 [PMID: 23358380]
  11. Science. 2007 Jul 6;317(5834):86-94 [PMID: 17615350]
  12. Nat Commun. 2017 Jan 23;8:14306 [PMID: 28112173]
  13. Gigascience. 2018 Jul 1;7(7): [PMID: 29917104]
  14. Biosci Biotechnol Biochem. 2010;74(6):1145-51 [PMID: 20530908]
  15. Bioinformatics. 2017 Jul 15;33(14):2202-2204 [PMID: 28369201]
  16. Science. 2012 Sep 28;337(6102):1661-5 [PMID: 23019650]
  17. Mol Ecol. 2015 Nov;24(21):5330-47 [PMID: 26414414]
  18. Nature. 2011 Jul 24;476(7360):320-3 [PMID: 21785439]
  19. Elife. 2016 May 24;5: [PMID: 27218454]
  20. ISME J. 2017 Jan;11(1):296-299 [PMID: 27420029]
  21. Nucleic Acids Res. 2012 Mar;40(5):e34 [PMID: 22180538]
  22. Bioinformatics. 2014 May 1;30(9):1236-40 [PMID: 24451626]
  23. Bioinformatics. 2014 Aug 1;30(15):2114-20 [PMID: 24695404]
  24. Curr Biol. 2013 Aug 5;23(15):1399-408 [PMID: 23850284]
  25. Front Plant Sci. 2014 Jun 16;5:209 [PMID: 24982662]
  26. BMC Genomics. 2016 Mar 17;17:245 [PMID: 26988094]
  27. Symbiosis. 1991;11:93-101 [PMID: 11538111]
  28. Nat Methods. 2013 Oct;10(10):996-8 [PMID: 23955772]
  29. PLoS One. 2014 Jan 15;9(1):e85182 [PMID: 24454815]
  30. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2007 Aug;73(16):5261-7 [PMID: 17586664]
  31. Bioinformatics. 2016 Dec 15;32(24):3702-3708 [PMID: 27540267]
  32. Bioinformatics. 2010 Oct 1;26(19):2460-1 [PMID: 20709691]
  33. Bioinformatics. 2015 Oct 1;31(19):3210-2 [PMID: 26059717]
  34. PLoS One. 2014 Aug 21;9(8):e105592 [PMID: 25144201]
  35. Bioinformatics. 2011 Nov 1;27(21):2957-63 [PMID: 21903629]
  36. Bioinformatics. 2014 Aug 15;30(16):2247-54 [PMID: 24790157]
  37. Science. 2010 May 21;328(5981):994-9 [PMID: 20489017]
  38. Mol Ecol Resour. 2017 Nov;17(6):e187-e195 [PMID: 28407448]
  39. Environ Microbiol. 2007 Nov;9(11):2707-19 [PMID: 17922755]
  40. Photochem Photobiol. 2007 Jul-Aug;83(4):833-8 [PMID: 17645654]
  41. Nat Methods. 2012 Mar 04;9(4):357-9 [PMID: 22388286]
  42. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2015 Sep 22;112(38):11893-8 [PMID: 26324906]
  43. Genome Biol. 2012 Dec 22;13(12):R122 [PMID: 23259615]
  44. Front Microbiol. 2014 May 07;5:206 [PMID: 24847321]
  45. Bioinformatics. 2011 Jun 15;27(12):1691-2 [PMID: 21493652]
  46. J Microbiol Biotechnol. 2017 Feb 28;27(2):321-334 [PMID: 27780961]
  47. Yale J Biol Med. 2016 Sep 30;89(3):353-362 [PMID: 27698619]
  48. Nucleic Acids Res. 2008 Apr;36(7):2230-9 [PMID: 18285365]
  49. Bioinformatics. 2013 Apr 15;29(8):1072-5 [PMID: 23422339]
  50. Nucleic Acids Res. 2014 Sep;42(15):e119 [PMID: 24990371]
  51. Sci Adv. 2017 Feb 15;3(2):e1602373 [PMID: 28246645]
  52. Environ Microbiol. 2015 Oct;17(10):3440-9 [PMID: 25708646]
  53. Genome Biol. 2013 Apr 25;14(4):R36 [PMID: 23618408]
  54. Bioinformatics. 2011 Mar 15;27(6):764-70 [PMID: 21217122]
  55. Nat Rev Genet. 2014 Feb;15(2):121-32 [PMID: 24434847]
  56. PLoS Biol. 2015 Aug 18;13(8):e1002226 [PMID: 26284777]
  57. Mol Biol Evol. 2009 May;26(5):1163-9 [PMID: 19233962]
  58. Front Microbiol. 2014 Nov 04;5:582 [PMID: 25408690]
  59. Genome Res. 2014 Aug;24(8):1384-95 [PMID: 24755901]
  60. PLoS One. 2017 May 9;12(5):e0177278 [PMID: 28486484]
  61. Nat Biotechnol. 2013 Jun;31(6):533-8 [PMID: 23707974]
  62. Bioinformatics. 2010 Mar 15;26(6):841-2 [PMID: 20110278]
  63. Sci Rep. 2017 Jan 17;7:40579 [PMID: 28094347]
  64. PeerJ. 2015 Aug 27;3:e1165 [PMID: 26336640]
  65. Genome Res. 2003 Aug;13(8):1916-22 [PMID: 12902383]

MeSH Term

Algorithms
Animals
Anthozoa
Cnidaria
Computational Biology
Coral Reefs
DNA
Ecology
Genome
Genomics
High-Throughput Nucleotide Sequencing
Metagenomics
Phylogeny
RNA, Ribosomal, 16S
Sequence Analysis, DNA
Symbiosis
Transcriptome

Chemicals

RNA, Ribosomal, 16S
DNA

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0genomecoralbinninghostcnidarianbasedhologenomicassemblystonycomplexeukaryoticsequencingassemblingpreviousgenomicsymbiont-freeapproachmayrusapproachesresultsdatasufficientprovidesBinninghandBackground:Manycnidariansincludingcoralsengagesymbioticassociationscomprisingphotosyntheticalgaehighlydiversemicrobialcommunities-togetherreferredholobionttaxonomiccomplexitymakesgenomesextremelychallengingThereforeprojectstissuesamplesHoweverapplicablemajorityspeciesecologicalreasonsthereforeevaluatedperformancealternativemethodsequencereconstructingPoritessamplecomparedtraditionalResults:demonstrateperformswellproducingreadsdraftPevaluationoperationalcriteriashowedcomparabletermscompletenessusefulnessdespitehighdegreefragmentationadditionfoundexploratoryk-merestimationfeaturessizeheterozygosityConclusions:constitutespowerfuldisentanglingtaxonomicallyhologenomesConsideringrecentdeclinereefsonelimitationsfacilitaterapidreliablestudyalsoimportantmilestoneadvancingmetagenomicprokaryoticlevelenablesefficientreconstructionholobionts

Similar Articles

Cited By