Top-down matching singleton cues have no edge over top-down matching nonsingletons in spatial cueing.

Tobias Schoeberl, Florian Goller, Ulrich Ansorge
Author Information
  1. Tobias Schoeberl: Faculty of Psychology, University of Vienna, Liebiggasse 5, 1010, Wien, Austria. tobias.schoeberl@univie.ac.at.
  2. Florian Goller: Faculty of Psychology, University of Vienna, Liebiggasse 5, 1010, Wien, Austria.
  3. Ulrich Ansorge: Faculty of Psychology, University of Vienna, Liebiggasse 5, 1010, Wien, Austria.

Abstract

In the present study, we investigated in a novel version of the peripheral-cueing paradigm whether object salience influences attentional selection at early stages of visual processing. In each trial, participants searched for targets of one of two possible colors. In the most important condition, the cueing displays consisted of a singleton cue having one target color and three additional nonsingletons of another target color. Hence, all objects in these all-relevant cueing displays had a target color. If singletons initially capture attention in a stimulus-driven way, regular cueing effects (faster responses to targets at the cued location than to targets away from the cue) should be found in these conditions. However, the results suggested otherwise: As compared to a control condition with a singleton cue of a target color among nonsingletons of a nontarget color, the cueing effects in all-relevant cueing displays were strongly reduced. This was also replicated with a very brief cue-target interval. The results suggest top-down contingent capture of attention even during the initial phase of processing salient stimuli, and argue against stimulus-driven capture of attention plus subsequent rapid disengagement.

Keywords

References

  1. Atten Percept Psychophys. 2011 Jan;73(1):113-22 [PMID: 21258913]
  2. Psychol Sci. 2011 Mar;22(3):361-8 [PMID: 21310945]
  3. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2016 Aug;42(8):1104-20 [PMID: 26854530]
  4. Atten Percept Psychophys. 2017 May;79(4):1087-1096 [PMID: 28160238]
  5. Atten Percept Psychophys. 2010 Feb;72(2):326-41 [PMID: 20139449]
  6. Percept Psychophys. 1999 Aug;61(6):1009-23 [PMID: 10497423]
  7. Atten Percept Psychophys. 2010 Aug;72(6):1455-70 [PMID: 20675793]
  8. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2014 Aug;40(4):1465-78 [PMID: 24730745]
  9. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2012 Jun;38(3):758-75 [PMID: 22201470]
  10. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2013 Sep 09;368(1628):20130055 [PMID: 24018717]
  11. Percept Psychophys. 1994 May;55(5):485-96 [PMID: 8008550]
  12. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 1992 Nov;18(4):1030-44 [PMID: 1431742]
  13. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2018 Apr;44(4):626-644 [PMID: 29035072]
  14. Percept Psychophys. 1992 Jun;51(6):599-606 [PMID: 1620571]
  15. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2018 Mar;44(3):433-451 [PMID: 28816482]
  16. Atten Percept Psychophys. 2016 Apr;78(3):789-807 [PMID: 26742497]
  17. Acta Psychol (Amst). 2010 Oct;135(2):77-99 [PMID: 20507828]
  18. Psychol Sci. 2015 Nov;26(11):1740-50 [PMID: 26420441]

MeSH Term

Adult
Attention
Color Perception
Cues
Female
Humans
Male
Photic Stimulation
Reaction Time
Spatial Processing
Young Adult

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0cueingcolorcapturetargettargetsdisplayssingletoncuenonsingletonsattentionprocessingoneconditionall-relevantstimulus-driveneffectsresultstop-downmatchingpresentstudyinvestigatednovelversionperipheral-cueingparadigmwhetherobjectsalienceinfluencesattentionalselectionearlystagesvisualtrialparticipantssearchedtwopossiblecolorsimportantconsistedthreeadditionalanotherHenceobjectssingletonsinitiallywayregularfasterresponsescuedlocationawayfoundconditionsHoweversuggestedotherwise:comparedcontrolamongnontargetstronglyreducedalsoreplicatedbriefcue-targetintervalsuggestcontingenteveninitialphasesalientstimuliargueplussubsequentrapiddisengagementTop-downcuesedgespatialAttentionContingentStimulus-driven

Similar Articles

Cited By