Anaesthetic management of robotic-assisted gynaecology surgery in the morbidly obese - A case series of 46 patients in a UK university teaching hospital.

Jagadish Sadashivaiah, Dabeer Ahmed, Nahid Gul
Author Information
  1. Jagadish Sadashivaiah: Department of Anaesthesia, Sidra Medical and Research Center, Doha, Qatar.
  2. Dabeer Ahmed: Department of Anaesthesia, Wirral University Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Wirral, UK.
  3. Nahid Gul: Department of Gynaecology, Wirral University Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Wirral, UK.

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: The evolution of robotic technology has enhanced the scope of laparoscopic surgery. Morbid obesity [body mass index (BMI) >40 kg/m] due to significant physiological attributes presents a significant surgical and anaesthetic challenge. Robotic surgery in this subset of patients can present with its own problems due to surgical requirements of prolonged pneumoperitoneum and steep Trendelenburg position.
METHODS: We reviewed the anaesthetic management of 46 morbidly obese patients undergoing robotic-assisted laparoscopic gynaecology surgery. Patient characteristics, anaesthetic management, length of hospital stay (LOS), complications, and readmissions within 30 days were noted. Mean with standard deviation was used for statistical analysis.
RESULTS: The mean [standard deviation (SD)] weight and BMI were 121.2 (18.49) kg and 47.83 (7.89) kg/m, respectively. The mean (SD) anaesthetic and surgical times were 229 (75.9) and 167.7 (62.7) min, respectively. The mean (SD) LOS was 1.57 (1.03) days. About 70% of patients were discharged on the first day after surgery. Six patients needed critical care support. There were two readmissions within 30 days.
CONCLUSION: Good preparation, teamwork, and multidisciplinary input helped us to conduct complex robotic-assisted and long-duration surgery in morbidly obese patients with minimal complications.

Keywords

References

  1. Am J Med. 2005 Sep;118(9):978-80 [PMID: 16164883]
  2. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2013 May;208(5):368.e1-7 [PMID: 23395927]
  3. Anesthesiology. 2009 Feb;110(2):266-74 [PMID: 19194154]
  4. Rev Urol. 2013;15(4):178-84 [PMID: 24659914]
  5. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 Feb 15;(2):CD008978 [PMID: 22336855]
  6. Anaesthesia. 2015 Jul;70(7):859-76 [PMID: 25950621]
  7. Gynecol Oncol. 2008 Dec;111(3):407-11 [PMID: 18829091]
  8. Anesthesiology. 2000 May;92(5):1229-36 [PMID: 10781266]
  9. Fertil Steril. 2009 Jun;91(6):2620-2 [PMID: 18656185]
  10. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2012 Jan;22(1):76-81 [PMID: 22134121]
  11. BMC Anesthesiol. 2015 May 06;15:56 [PMID: 25907273]
  12. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2014 May-Jun;21(3):353-61 [PMID: 24295923]
  13. J Clin Anesth. 2015 Sep;27(6):470-5 [PMID: 26144913]
  14. Br J Anaesth. 2015 Dec;115(6):827-48 [PMID: 26556848]
  15. Surg Clin North Am. 2003 Dec;83(6):1321-37 [PMID: 14712869]
  16. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2012 Jun;22(5):819-25 [PMID: 22561178]
  17. Obstet Gynecol. 2012 Sep;120(3):604-11 [PMID: 22914470]
  18. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1997 Jul;177(1):109-14 [PMID: 9240592]
  19. Ochsner J. 2013 Winter;13(4):517-24 [PMID: 24358000]
  20. Br J Anaesth. 2017 Apr 1;118(4):492-503 [PMID: 28403397]
  21. Anesthesiology. 2009 Apr;110(4):891-7 [PMID: 19293691]

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0surgerypatientsanaestheticmanagementsurgicalmorbidlyobeserobotic-assistedcomplicationsdaysmeanSD7laparoscopicobesityBMIduesignificantpneumoperitoneum46gynaecologyhospitalLOSreadmissionswithin30deviationrespectively1AnaestheticBACKGROUNDANDAIMS:evolutionrobotictechnologyenhancedscopeMorbid[bodymassindex>40kg/m]physiologicalattributespresentschallengeRoboticsubsetcanpresentproblemsrequirementsprolongedsteepTrendelenburgpositionMETHODS:reviewedundergoingPatientcharacteristicslengthstaynotedMeanstandardusedstatisticalanalysisRESULTS:[standard]weight12121849kg478389kg/mtimes22975916762min570370%dischargedfirstdaySixneededcriticalcaresupporttwoCONCLUSION:Goodpreparationteamworkmultidisciplinaryinputhelpedusconductcomplexlong-durationminimal-caseseriesUKuniversityteachinglaparoscopymorbid

Similar Articles

Cited By